Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018143
Original file (20110018143.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110018143 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he has two awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).

2.  The applicant states that his two awards of the BSM and his award of the PUC are not reflected on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of citations for his two BSMs and the PUC.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted in Louisville, Kentucky on 30 August 1968.  He completed his basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and his advanced individual training as a cannoneer at Fort Sill, Oklahoma before being transferred to Vietnam on 1 January 1969 for assignment to C Battery, 2d Battalion, 
11th Artillery Regiment, 101st Airborne Division.

3.  On 23 July 1969, General Orders Number 9404 issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for the period 1 January to 31 May 1969.

4.  On 30 August 1969, General Orders Number 11471 issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, awarded the applicant the BSM for the period of 1 January to 31 August 1969.

5.  On 27 October 1969, General Orders Number 13276 issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, awarded the applicant the ARCOM with "V" Device for heroism on 14 June 1969.

6.  On 30 November 1969, General Orders Number 14142 issued by Headquarters, 101stAirborne Division, awarded the applicant the BSM for the period of 1 February to 30 November 1969.

7.  The applicant served in four campaigns And departed Vietnam on 1 January 1970 for assignment to Fort Stewart, Georgia where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had served 2 years of active service and his DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the BSM and the ARCOM with "V" Device.

8.  A review of his official records shows that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 
3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of Soldiers for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  It shows that the applicant's unit was cited for awards of the PUC, the Valorous Unit Award (VUA), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his period of assignment to the unit.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in appendix B will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was awarded two awards of the BSM during his tour in Vietnam and is entitled to have the award of the BSM with one oak leaf cluster (BSM with 1OLC) added to his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant was also awarded the ARCOM and the ARCOM with 
"V" Device.  Accordingly, he is entitled to have the award of the ARCOM with 
"V" Device and 1OLC added to his DD Form 214. 

3.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 30 July 1968 through 29 July 1970.  This conclusion is based on the fact that his record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving this award.  The evidence further suggests that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of his unit commanders.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected by awarding the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) and correcting his DD Form 214 to show this award.

4.  The applicant served in four campaigns in Vietnam and thus is entitled have four bronze service stars added to his VSM. 

5.  The applicant’s unit was awarded the PUC, the VUA, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his period of assignment.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.
BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* Deleting the award of the VSM from block 24 of his DD Form 214
* Adding the award of the VSM with four bronze service stars to block 24 of his DD Form 214
* Deleting the award of the ARCOM with "V" Device from block 24 of his 
DD Form 214
* Adding the award of the ARCOM with "V" Device and 1OLC to block 24 of his DD Form 214
* Deleting the award of the BSM from block 24 of his DD Form 214
* Adding the award of the BSM with 1OLC to block 24 of his DD Form 214
* Adding the awards of the PUC, VUA, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation to block 24 of his DD Form 214
* Awarding him the AGCM (first award) for the period of 30 July 1968 through 29 July 1970 and adding it to block 24 of his DD Form 214.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018143





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018143



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020292

    Original file (20130020292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant was awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The entry in item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 that shows he was wounded in action on 15 May 1969 and the DA Form 8-275-3 that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart on 17 May 1969 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base adding award of the Purple Heart to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018370

    Original file (20080018370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all awards he earned during his active duty service, to include service medals authorized for Republic of Vietnam (RVN) service, be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Combat Infantryman Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103860C070208

    Original file (2004103860C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in the 101st Airborne Division in the RVN from 2 May 1968 through 17 May 1969. The evidence of record also confirms that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the applicant is entitled to the PUC, VUA, MUC, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation and 4 bronze service stars with his VSM. As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002630

    Original file (20090002630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 2 (Service Number [SN]), item 3 (Social Security Number [SSN]), and item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his complete SN, correct SSN, and to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) 1st Oak Leaf Cluster with "V” (Valor) Device, Air Medal (AM),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003391

    Original file (20150003391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he served a tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) beginning on 2 December 1967 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to – * Company C, 3rd Battalion (Airborne), 187th Infantry from 4 December 1967 to 19 December 1967 * Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry, from 20 December 1967 to 26 December 1968 * item 41 (Awards and Decorations) – * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014411

    Original file (20110014411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows the applicant earned three marksmanship badges that were not listed in item 24 of his DD Form 214. However, his unit was never cited for award of the MUC at any time during its service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012114

    Original file (20110012114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded a second award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and that all of his authorized awards be added to his DD Form 214 ( Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). He had served 4 years, 1 month, and 14 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015901

    Original file (20110015901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with “V” Device for heroism in the RVN on 9 May 1968 and this award was announced and authorized in GOs issued by the 199th Infantry Brigade, as evidenced by an entry in item 41 of his DA Form 20. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020200

    Original file (20100020200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his record be corrected by adding a third award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and all unit awards due based on his service and campaign participation in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * self-authored statement * ARCOM Certificate, dated 12 February 1971 * ARCOM Citation * ARCOM Orders, dated 24 February 1971 * enlisted disability retirement letter orders, dated 3 August 1971 * DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018250

    Original file (20100018250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was awarded all of those awards and they were omitted from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. Adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * BSM with 1OLC and “V” Device * ARCOM with 1OLC...