Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018020
Original file (20110018020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110018020 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was promoted to sergeant, pay grade E-5.  He further requests to receive back pay for this promotion.

2.  The applicant states he enlisted into the U.S. Army beginning in the pay grade E-2 based on his Reserve Officer Corps Training (ROTC).  He contends that because of this advanced grade at enlistment, every grade should have been to the next level, making him an E-5 when he was promoted to E-4.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant:

	a.  enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 January 1969, beginning in the rank of private, pay grade E-2 (temporary);

	b.  completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman);

	c.  was appointed to private, pay grade E-2 (Permanent) on 11 April 1969;

	d.  was advanced to private first class, pay grade E-3 (Permanent) on 20 July 1969; and 

	e.  was advanced to specialist four, pay grade E-4 (Temporary) on 
22 January 1970.

3.  On 29 January 1971, the applicant was released from active duty (REFRAD) service and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He had completed 1 year, 
11 months, and 29 days of creditable active duty service.

4.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), as then in effect, prescribed the policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 7 of this regulation pertained to the promotion and reduction of enlisted personnel and provided the following criteria for promotion to pay grade E-5:

	a.  time in grade (TIG) and time in service (TIS) requirements:

* 8 months TIG (1/2 may be waivered)
* 21 months TIS (6 months may be waivered)

	b.  be in a promotable status;

	c.  be recommended for promotion by the commander;

	d.  appear before a promotion board, be selected and placed on the recommended list; and

	e.  meet or exceed the monthly MOS quota as indicated by the established promotion cut-off score;
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he was promoted to sergeant, pay grade E-5, and given back pay.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army beginning in pay grade E-2.  He was subsequently advanced to specialist four, pay grade E-4 on 22 January 1970.  Accordingly, the earliest date, with maximum TIG and TIS waivers, that he would have become eligible for promotion recommendation/consideration to E-5 and placed on the recommended list would have been 22 May 1970 (4 months TIG and 15 months TIS as an E-4).  This is assuming he met all other promotion criteria.  However, due to the passage of time, there is no available record of the monthly cut-off scores for his MOS during the period from June 1970 until his REFRAD on 29 January 1971.  Furthermore, there is no documentation in his military records showing that his commander had granted him any waivers or had recommended him for promotion to E-5.

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018020





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018020



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015028

    Original file (20140015028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As of the date of his wounds, the applicant had 5 months time in grade (TIG) and 10 months time in service (TIS). It states in: a. Paragraph 7-12 (Promotion of Personnel missing or hospitalized as a result of hostile action), for personnel transferred to a medical facility, the losing promotion authority may include with that Soldier's records a recommendation for promotion. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020569

    Original file (20110020569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his retired rank as specialist (SPC), pay grade E-4. He was placed on the retired list effective 30 March 2009, in the rank of SPC, pay grade E-4. Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the Soldiers separation date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000510

    Original file (20110000510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110000510 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Following his tour in Vietnam, the applicant was reassigned to Fort Benning, GA for duty with Company A, 5th Battalion, 31st Infantry. Item 33 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following appointments and reductions: * PVT/E-1 on 5 February 1968 * PV2/E-2 on 12 April 1968 [accelerated promotion] * PFC/E-3 on 20 July 1968 * SP4/E-4 on 12 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020911

    Original file (20110020911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was promoted as follows: * PV1- 23 December 1988 * PV2- 22 August 1989 * PFC - no entry * SPC - 16 February 1990 7. With regard to the rank/grade of E-1 recorded on the applicants DD Form 214; she enlisted in the USAR as a PV1 on 23 December 1988 and was promoted to PV2 on 22 August 1989. Additionally, the characterization of service for USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT and are in entry level status is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005240C071029

    Original file (20070005240C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), be promoted to the rank of specialist four (SP4). During its original review of the case, the Board recommended the applicant's record be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart; however, it found insufficient evidence to support a conclusion that he had been promoted prior to separation, as contended by the applicant at the time. The original decision of the Board regarding the FSM's promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001792

    Original file (20080001792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. correction of his records to show that he was awarded a trophy by the post Commanding General for his performance with the M-14 rifle; b. correction of his records to show that he was released from active duty in the rank/pay grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6; and c. reconsideration of his earlier request that his summer camp be listed on his records. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his release from active duty for training shows he completed 4 months...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019632

    Original file (20140019632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. There is no evidence to show the applicant was promoted further during his period of service. His Army Military Human Resource Record (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File) contains insufficient evidence to support the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005182

    Original file (20080005182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 (Wounds) is blank, and Item 41 (Decorations and Awards) does not include the SS or PH. However, there is no evidence indicating that he was ever recommended for or awarded the SS by proper authority while serving on active duty, and he has failed to provide sufficient compelling evidence of an act of gallantry that would support award the SS at this late date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013730

    Original file (20110013730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 and to show he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Hand Grenade Bars. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, stated a Soldier could be advanced to SPC/E-4 with 26 months' time in service (TIS) and 6 months' time in grade (TIG). Therefore, it would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013294

    Original file (20120013294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence to show the applicant was recommended for promotion to SPC/E-4 during his period of service. e. If a unit commander elects not to recommend a Soldier for promotion on the automatic promotion date, then a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) denying the promotion will be submitted not later than the 20th day of the month preceding the month of automatic promotion. The applicable regulation states that promotion to SPC is automatic with 24 months TIS provided the Soldier is...