Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017895
Original file (20110017895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017895 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, a change in the narrative reason for separation shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  He states he wishes to afford himself the opportunity to enlist if his medical disabilities clear up.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 April 2010.  After completing basic combat training on 13 September 2010, he was assigned to Fort Huachuca, AZ, for advanced individual training (AIT).

2.  During the period 14 September through 14 November 2010 while attending AIT, he received performance counseling on multiple occasions for the following:

* failing to maintain proper hygiene and disregard for fellow Soldiers' health
* being on duty out of uniform
* sleeping in class
* malingering
* failing a graded performance evaluation
* failing to do assigned homework
* missing a medical appointment and failure to follow an order or regulation
* being late for duty
* wearing civilian clothes while on reduced privileges
* harassing a female Soldier
* failing to report

3.  On 14 October 2010, he received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for failing to obey a lawful order and being derelict in the performance of his duties.

4.  On 29 November 2010, he underwent a behavioral health evaluation.  The U.S. Army Medical Command Form 4038 (Report of Behavioral Health Evaluation) completed at that time shows he had been discharged from inpatient psychiatric hospitalization approximately 5 days earlier.  The examining psychologist diagnosed him as having an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood and predominantly inattentive-type attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.  The examining psychologist found he met psychiatric criteria for expeditious administrative separation in accordance with Army Regulation 
635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17 (Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions).

5.  In an undated memorandum, his commander notified him he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, based on his diagnosis of adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.  His commander noted he had received NJP and informed him he was recommending characterization of his service as general under honorable conditions.

6.  On 7 January 2011, he acknowledged receipt of notice of the contemplated action to separate him.

7.  On 12 January 2011, he waived the opportunity to consult with an attorney concerning the election of his rights for the proposed administrative discharge.  He acknowledged he had been afforded the opportunity to consult with counsel and elected to proceed without consultation.  He further indicated he understood the separation action would be processed as if he had consulted with counsel and stated he had made the decision to waive counsel of his own free will.

8.  He elected not to submit statements in his own behalf and acknowledged he would be ineligible to apply for enlistment for a period of 2 years after discharge.

9.  On 12 January 2011, the separation authority approved his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, and directed issuance of a General Discharge Certificate.  On 19 January 2011, he was discharged accordingly.

10.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) – Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 
5-17
* item 27 (Reentry Code) – 3
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – condition, not a disability

11.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the narrative reasons for separation to be entered in item 28 of the DD Form 214.  It states the narrative reason for separation for Soldiers discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-20, paragraph 5-17, is "condition, not a disability."

12.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) governs eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing of persons into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Table 3-1 includes a list of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible to reenlist unless a waiver is granted.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, which required "condition, not a disability" as the narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.

2.  During his discharge processing, he acknowledged he would be ineligible to apply for enlistment for a period of 2 years after discharge and he was assigned the associated RE code of 3.  When the 2-year period of ineligibility has expired, he may contact a recruiter to pursue a waiver to enlist.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the relief he requests.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017895



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017895



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085781C070212

    Original file (2003085781C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with an honorable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, for a personality disorder. However, the applicant's discharge proceedings and his DD Form 214 erroneously show that he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, for a personality disorder. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct items 25, 26 and 28 on the applicant's DD Form 214 to show that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018596

    Original file (20140018596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically discharged with a reason for separation of "medical issue". On 10 June 2011, the applicant was discharged under Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 13 for unsatisfactory performance with a general discharge. The applicant has not provided any evidence that at the time of separation he was unfit for duty due to a medical condition.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009937

    Original file (20110009937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides the following documents: a. a clinical assessment in which he indicated his mental health issues as PTSD, depression, anxiety, and medical issues of neck and back pain; b. a clinical summary which indicated he was diagnosed with poly-substance dependence, substance-induced PTSD at axis I; back pain and neck pain at axis II; and problems with primary supports, social environment, legal housing, and other at axis IV; c. an EAEDC Medical Report that shows he underwent a medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017371

    Original file (20140017371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that the separation authority, narrative reason for separation, separation code, and RE code shown on his DD Form 214 should be corrected because he was diagnosed with seizures and ADHD; however, he was not properly tested to determine if the diagnoses were accurate and his medical records prove that he does not have those medical conditions. Moreover, there is no evidence of record that shows he was separated from military service based on any such condition(s). e....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014895

    Original file (20110014895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states: * he has new evidence that the medical reason for his discharge was a misdiagnosis * the head of psychology at a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital has determined there is no evidence he suffers from a personality disorder * he was screened for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and found to be free of that condition * the head of psychology believes he suffered from "acute stress reaction" at the time of his discharge * he graduated Magna Cum Laude from a university...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010188

    Original file (20120010188.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did not require any psych medications during the hospitalization and did not report any PTSD symptoms. The discharge note stated he was not reporting any PTSD symptoms at that time. Although he carried a diagnosis, at various times, of PTSD, Anxiety Disorder, and/or Adjustment Disorder, he almost routinely denied symptoms of the above and was not interested in treatment for same.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00420

    Original file (ND00-00420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00420 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000215, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980929 with an Uncharacterized service (entry level separation) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment (A). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016298

    Original file (20110016298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 March 2007, the applicant's commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-13, for the reason of his diagnosis with an adjustment disorder with disturbance of emotions and conduct and a personality disorder not otherwise specified (paranoid and schizoid features). His DD Form 214 shows that on 30 March 2007 he was given an honorable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005321

    Original file (20120005321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The basis for the action was on or between 4 April 2011, the applicant wrongfully possessed marijuana, and on or between 7 March 2011 and 7 April 2011, he wrongfully used marijuana. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019663

    Original file (20130019663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records, including the authority, narrative reason, separation program designator (SPD) code, and reentry eligibility (RE) code of his administrative discharge, to show that he was discharged based on a medical finding of being physically unfit for active duty and an upgrade of the characterization of his service to honorable. It requires a Soldier being considered for administrative separation under Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty...