Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017726
Original file (20110017726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  1 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017726 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct separation date.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows he was separated on
12 January 2005; however, orders show he was discharged on 13 January 2006.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in question, physical disability separation memorandum, and discharge orders in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant had prior honorable active duty enlisted service in the Regular Army from 8 August 1978 through 2 May 1983.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) of the United States and Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) on 16 September 1984.  He was:

* awarded military occupational specialty 88M (Motor Transport Operator)
* promoted to the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 on 15 September 1992

4.  A memorandum issued by the Military Division, State of Georgia, Atlanta, GA, dated 15 December 1999, notified the applicant of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60.

5.  A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 30 January 2003, shows that pursuant to Title 10, U.S. Code (10 USC), section 12302, the applicant was involuntarily extended and ordered to active duty as a member of his unit in support of Mobilization Alert Order Number 002-18, Change 1 "Operation Noble Eagle/ Enduring Freedom" for partial mobilization.

6.  Orders 005-546, issued by the State of Georgia, Military Division, Office of the Adjutant General, Atlanta, dated 5 January 2004, amended Orders 029-540, issued by the same headquarters, dated 29 January 2003, to change the applicant's period of active duty as follows:

* as reads "30 January 2003 - 29 January 2004"
* amended to read "30 January 2003 - 28 January 2005"

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 30 January 2003, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12 January 2005, and he transferred to the 1177th Transportation Company (GAARNG), La Grange, GA.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 13 days of net active service this period; 5 years and 23 days of total prior active service; and 19 years,
4 months, and 29 days of total prior inactive service.  It also shows in:

	a.  item 12b (Separation Date This Period) the entry "2005  01  12";

	b.  item 18 (Remarks) the entry:

* Ordered to active duty in support of Operation Noble Eagle/Enduring Freedom in accordance with 10 USC 12302A

* Block 25 (Separation Authority):  Orders Number 029-540, 20030129, amended by Orders Number 005-546, 20040105

	c.  Item 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated) the applicant placed his signature on the document.

8.  Orders 067-037, issued by The Adjutant General, State of Georgia, Ellenwood, GA, dated 8 March 2006, honorably discharged the applicant from the ARNG effective 13 January 2006.  He was authorized a disability rating of
20 percent (%) and disability severance pay in grade E-6 based on 10 years and
8 months service.

9.  In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents:

	a.  U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), Washington, DC, memorandum, dated 16 December 2005, that forwarded the applicant's discharge orders to the Office of The Adjutant General, GAARNG.

	b.  Orders D351-01, issued by the USAPDA, Washington, DC, dated 
16 December 2005, that discharged the applicant from the ARNG and U.S. Army Reserve effective 13 January 2006.  The orders authorized the applicant a disability rating of 20% and disability severance pay in grade E-6 based on
10 years and 8 months service.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.

	a.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the source documents for entering information on the DD Form 214 will be the Enlisted/Officer Record Brief, separation approval authority documentation, separation orders, or any other document authorized for filing in the Official Military Personnel File.

	b.  Paragraph 2-4 (Completing the DD Form 214) contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214.  The instructions for completing item 12b states to enter the Soldier's transition date.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Records show the applicant was ordered to active duty on 30 January 2003 for a period 1 year and that his period of active duty was extended for 1 year.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 30 January 2003, he was honorably REFRAD on 12 January 2005, and he transferred to his GAARNG unit.

3.  There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was retained on active duty beyond 12 January 2005.  In addition, the applicant acknowledged with his signature that he was being REFRAD on 12 January 2005.

4.  Orders D351-01 discharged the applicant from the ARNG effective
13 January 2006.  However, this order has no bearing on his period of active service for which he was issued the DD Form 214 ending 12 January 2005.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017726



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017726



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018199

    Original file (20080018199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 7 March 2007 upon his completion of WOCS and execution of an oath of office. Subsequently, the applicant's Federal recognition packet was considered by a second GAARNG Federal Recognition Board on 13 December 2007 and the applicant executed a second oath of office on that date. Based on the recommendations of the second GAARNG Federal Recognition Board, the NGB issued orders awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016672

    Original file (20140016672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was honorably REFRAD on 31 May 2006 to the control of his State ARNG by reason of completion of his required active service in accordance with AR 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations). Most if not all of the applicant's medical records during his active duty service from 6 December 2004 to 31 May 2006 are not available for review with this case. Most of the applicant's medical records during this period of service are not available for review with this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019781

    Original file (20090019781.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available record does not indicate his appointment packet was considered by a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) to determine if he was qualified to be awarded Federal recognition. The evidence of record shows the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 20 July 2006 upon his initial appointment in the ALARNG and execution of the oath of office. As a result, the Board recommends that State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016467

    Original file (20100016467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no records to show he went before a medical evaluation board (MEB). This same VA Rating Decision determined his pancreatitis was not related to his military service. The applicant did not have any diagnosed medically unfitting condition that required physical disability processing.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022997

    Original file (20120022997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant applied for disability compensation from the VA for injuries received while deployed and was awarded 50% compensation in July 2008. c. The Medical Fitness Standards for Retention memorandum was sent via certified mail to the applicant. He had filed for and received compensation from the VA in spite of not having a PEB prior to his discharge. He applied for and was awarded a 50% service-connected disability rating from the VA in July 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017332

    Original file (20060017332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, her date of rank and appointment date be corrected. The applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition in the GAARNG, as a second lieutenant (2LT/O-1), in the Adjutant General (AG) Corps branch effective 22 February 2005. The evidence shows the Federal Recognition Examining Board recommended the applicant for appointment in the GAARNG in the rank of second lieutenant with an effective date and date of rank of 22 February 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001001

    Original file (20130001001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 11 June 2004, to show her home of record (HOR) as an Alabama (AL) address instead of P.O. When her mobilization period ended, she was issued orders that released her from active duty on 11 June 2004 and listed the place she entered active duty as Columbus, GA, and her HOR as Fort Gordon, GA. Therefore, without evidence to the contrary, it is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017333

    Original file (20060017333.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition, effective 12 May 2004, upon his initial appointment in the GAARNG as 2LT. Based on the recommendations of the second GAARNG Federal Recognition Board, the National Guard Bureau issued orders awarding the applicant permanent Federal recognition, effective 19 January 2006. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014720

    Original file (20070014720.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognitions Examining Board), dated 8 December 2004; c. Officer Candidate School Graduation Diploma, dated 12 March 2005; d. Applicant's Oath of Office and temporary Federal Recognition to second lieutenant in the Army National Guard, dated 12 March 2005; e. Orders 084-003, dated 25 March 2005, appointing him in the Army National Guard; f. NGB Form 89, dated 19 January 2006; g. Applicant's Oath of Office and temporary Federal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017880

    Original file (20070017880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Board for Correction of Military Records, Record of Proceedings, dated 2 November 2006. b. On 26 December 2006, the State of Georgia, Department of Defense, Military Division, Ellenwood, Georgia Army National Guard, published Orders 360-089, amending the applicant’s promotion service date from 20 January 2005 to 20 January 2004 and his promotion eligibility date as 19 January 2006 instead of 19 January 2007. The promotion effective date is not the date of appointment into the position...