Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017682
Original file (20110017682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:   

		BOARD DATE:  23 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017682 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  He states it has been 27 years and he believes it would be appropriate to upgrade his discharge.  He served his country faithfully and supports our Armed Forces.  Additionally, he needs the discharge upgraded to support a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) claim.  He injured his back while in the service.

3.  The applicant did not provide any additional documentation.
 
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 August 1983.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  On 17 October 1984, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for being AWOL from 4 September to 20 September 1984, and for wrongful possession of a small amount of marijuana.  

4.  The applicant's discharge processing documentation is not available.  However, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was administratively discharged on 21 December 1984 under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), in lieu of court-martial.  He was issued an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge.  He had completed 1 year, 3 months, and 26 days of total active service.

5.  On 27 October 1988, the Army Discharge Review Board upgraded his UOTHC discharge to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	c.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

7.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army acting through the ABCMR.  Paragraph 2-9 states that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not available.  His DD Form 214 shows he was administratively discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of court-martial.

2.  The regulations governing the Board's operation require that the discharge process must be presumed to have been in accordance with applicable laws and regulations unless the applicant can provide evidence to overcome that presumption.

3.  The ABCMR does not upgrade discharges based solely on the passage of time nor does it correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for benefits from another agency.  The granting of veteran's benefits is not within the purview of the ABCMR and any questions regarding eligibility for health care and other benefits should be addressed to the VA.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X_ ___  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015867



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017682



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018565

    Original file (20080018565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him, or of a lesser included offense, that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a UOTHC discharge. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of a court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000475

    Original file (20140000475.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 December 1986, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request to upgrade his UOTHC to a general discharge. Chapter 10 of the regulation in effect at the time provided that a member who had committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005690

    Original file (20120005690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). On 3 May 1984, the applicant was discharged accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020941

    Original file (20130020941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Subsequent to receiving this legal counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. a. On 20 April 1988, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade of his UOTHC discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022653

    Original file (20100022653.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he completed 11 years of military service with no misconduct and had just one big mistake in his military career. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004353

    Original file (20110004353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to receiving this legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015925

    Original file (20110015925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 August 1984, the separation authority approved his request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial, with the issuance of a UOTHC discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, to avoid a trial by court-martial. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014454

    Original file (20090014454.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. On 22 June 1984, the discharge authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 and directed that the applicant receive a UOTHC discharge. Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013873

    Original file (20120013873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 August 1985, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of court-martial. On 20 August 1985, the Commanding General approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service, reduced the applicant to the lowest enlisted grade, and directed that he be issued a UOTHC Discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007898

    Original file (20120007898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 October 1987, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.