Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017234
Original file (20110017234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 1 March 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017234 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states the Army sent her husband's unit from Oakland, CA, through stops in Hawaii, Wake Island, and Guam.  His unit landed in Vietnam on 5 June 1966.  The company's orders were not at the base when they arrived.  The entire unit was based in Vietnam for approximately 2 1/2 weeks while they waited for their orders.  Her husband died of ischemic heart disease which is a disease presumed to be caused by exposure to Agent Orange.  Because the Army did not acknowledge the layover in Vietnam, she is being denied a monthly benefit available to her from the Department of Veterans Affairs.  She would like proof to show her deceased husband was in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides:

* letter to her Member of Congress
* letter from her Member of Congress
* marriage certificate
* FSM's death certificate
* FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* statement from a Soldier who served with the FSM



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 December 1965.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 64B (Heavy Vehicle Driver).  He was assigned in Thailand and at Fort Campbell, KY.  The highest grade/rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four/E-4.

3.  The FSM's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to Company C, 809th Engineer Battalion (Construction), in Thailand from 3 June 1966 to 18 May 1967.

4.  The FSM's records contain four sets of orders.  The first two sets of orders show an address with the Army Post Office (APO) of 96232, indicating he was assigned to Camp Charn, Thailand.  The second two sets of orders show an address with the APO of 96389, indicating he was assigned to Panom, Thailand.

5.  The FSM's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 14 December 1967.  There is no reference to service in Vietnam listed on his DD Form 214.

6.  The applicant provides a letter to her Congress member which outlines the details of her husband's trip.  She indicates the Army sent her husband from Oakland, CA, through stops in Hawaii, Wake Island, and Guam.  His unit landed in Vietnam on 5 June 1966.  She states her husband and his unit stayed in Vietnam for 2 1/2 weeks waiting for orders to Thailand.

7.  The applicant provides a statement from a man who served with her husband.  He indicated he served in the "809th Battalion unit, Company C," with her husband.  He further stated they were stationed at Oakland Army Base in California.  They flew out from Travis Air Force Base, stopped in Hawaii, Wake Island, and Guam.  They landed in Saigon, South Vietnam, on 5 June 1966.  They were living in "Tent City B."  Their orders weren't there when they arrived, so they ended up staying in Vietnam for about 2 1/2 weeks.  When their orders came through they were flown out to Bangkok, Thailand.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request that the FSM's records be updated to show Vietnam service or proof of Vietnam service has been carefully considered and researched.

2.  Unfortunately, other than the statement she provides from a Soldier who served with the FSM, there is no official record or documentation in the FSM's record that places him in Vietnam.

3.  Based on the forgoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017234



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017234



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00372

    Original file (BC-2011-00372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP was able to verify the following overseas service and his DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect 25 days of Foreign Service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial for award of the VSM. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00373 in Executive Session on 9 Jun 11, under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004119

    Original file (20140004119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 30 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show foreign service in Vietnam for 13 months instead of service in Thailand from 15 October 1966 to 28 September 1967. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 5 February 2014 * DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004119

    Original file (20140004119 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 30 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show foreign service in Vietnam for 13 months instead of service in Thailand from 15 October 1966 to 28 September 1967. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 5 February 2014 * DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006071

    Original file (20110006071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant states the FSM served in Thailand from 27 August to 3 December 1962 and when he requested his medals and awards in 2006 he was informed that he was entitled to the VSM; however, it was never added to his record. Army Regulation 600-8-22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008735

    Original file (20090008735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 3 January 1966 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Thailand and France/Germany. The applicant's DA Form 20 shows that he served in France from 14 March 1960 to 17 February 1963 and Thailand from 30 October 1964 to 24 August 1965. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 3 January 1966 DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010082

    Original file (20130010082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Thailand from January through August 1962. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his foreign service in Thailand and any and all awards he is authorized was carefully considered. Absent clarifying documentation that shows the exact dates his unit moved from Okinawa or, more specifically, the date he arrived in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080009449

    Original file (AR20080009449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Contrary to his belief, his September 1967 Military Payment Voucher does not confirm he "served in-country" in Vietnam, but rather his entitlement to foreign duty pay was based on his assignment in Thailand. Soldiers who served in Thailand in direct support of operations in Vietnam were eligible for Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024851

    Original file (20100024851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submits: * a copy of his DD Form 1056 (Authorization for a "No-Fee" Passport) * two Special Orders * a Standard Form 1012a (Travel Voucher) * his DD Form 214 * two photographs CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Evidence of record shows the applicant served in Vietnam from 6 April 1963 to 9 April 1963. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 26 of his DD Form 214 the National Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019491

    Original file (20110019491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Force of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Overseas Service Ribbon. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who were credited with a normal overseas tour completion before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981. The evidence of record shows he served in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012797

    Original file (20130012797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA, which has neither the authority nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions that it determines were incurred during military service and subsequently affects the individual's employability. The Army's determination of a Soldier's physical fitness or unfitness is a factual finding based on the individual's ability to perform the duties of his or her grade, rank, or rating. The applicant’s...