Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016874
Original file (20110016874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  22 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016874 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he believes that he qualifies for award of the Purple Heart under current standards.  He goes on to state that the new rules are much broader now than they were when he was in combat in Korea in regards to loss of consciousness, memory and dizziness.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of an article from the Veterans of Foreign Wars magazine, a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), a copy of a certificate defining his combat time, a copy of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, a letter addressed to the VA describing his injury, and two third party statements regarding his injury.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the NPRC in 1973.  It is believed the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Dallas, Texas on 8 June 1949 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training as a field wireman and he served 11 months and 19 days of foreign service and participated in five campaigns while in Korea.

4.  On 21 August 1952 he was honorably discharged at Fort Sill, Oklahoma in the rank of sergeant.  He had served 3 years, 2 months and 14 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge contains the entry “None” in block 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces).

5.  A review of the Korean War Casualty File failed to show that the applicant was reported as a battle casualty.  Additionally, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was injured as a result of enemy action and that treatment for such injuries were made a matter of record.

6.  A review of the statement submitted by the applicant with his application that he submitted to the VA in support of his disability claim shows that the applicant was injured when his left climbing spur gave way while he was up a telephone pole stringing commo wire and he fell 25 feet to the ground.  He visited the battalion aid station and layed around the battalion area for a couple of days recuperating.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.



8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states that when contemplating an award of the Purple Heart the key issue commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury.  The Purple Heart is authorized when individuals are wounded/injured as a direct result of enemy action.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries sustained when he fell off a telephone pole while stringing commo wire has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  The available records do not contain and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show that he was injured as a result of enemy action and that treatment for his injuries were made a matter of record.

3.  Unfortunately, the lack of records and the passage of 50+ years makes it difficult at best to verify what happened in the applicant’s case.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show otherwise, it must be presumed that he was not authorized the award of the Purple Heart either under the standards in effect at the time or the current standards.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X __  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the 


United States during the Korean War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
      
      
      
      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
 I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016874





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016874



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014461

    Original file (20080014461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. the FSM’s WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, Honorable Discharge), dated 12 November 1945; b. the FSM's certificate of death, dated 17 July 2007; c. certificate of marriage, dated 9 June 1951; d. witness letter, dated 13 January 2002, from a former unit member; and e. operational history sheet of the 438th Signal Heavy Construction Battalion from April 1943 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052769C070420

    Original file (2001052769C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of his application, he submits a WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation); five letters from current medical providers; a letter of explanation, dated 30 June 2000; a statement from the Assistant S-2 of the 280th Engineer Combat Battalion at the time in question, dated 30 August 2000; an eyewitness statement, dated 30 August 2000, from a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009279

    Original file (20140009279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * his application to register for the draft or enlist * his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 11 November 1945 * his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) * his Separation Qualification Record * his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) showing U.S. Navy service ending 23 October 1952 * a letter from a former Soldier, dated 29 December 1994 * a letter from former Soldier,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016942

    Original file (20090016942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart. In order to justify a correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015590

    Original file (20100015590.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he did not know he could receive the Purple Heart. He indicated he injured his Achilles tendon in Vietnam and has a physical profile. His service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds, and his medical records do not conclusively reflect he suffered an injury as a result of enemy action and was treated for a combat injury or wound.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012419

    Original file (20080012419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the applicant be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries sustained as a result of enemy action when a North Korean grenade exploded and shrapnel was lodged in the applicant's head. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. c. There are no medical records to show the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060016141C071029

    Original file (AR20060016141C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available records indicate that the applicant was in Korea on 26 November 1950, when he was treated by physicians for fractures of his right 3rd and 4th fingers after a tank hatch fell on his hands. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022949

    Original file (20110022949.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the records do not note that there was a big explosion while burning the trash and his fingertips were blown off, they were not amputated * the company commander stated the explosion was a result of a booby trap * he was told at the time that although he was in the hospital, the Army would award him the medal * he has seen many Soldiers honored with the Purple Heart over the years while he is still waiting for his 3. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015944C070206

    Original file (20050015944C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), shows the Republic of Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and National the Defense Service Medal. Evidence of record show that the applicant is entitled to two Overseas Service Bars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004689C070206

    Original file (20050004689C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since there is no authority for award of the Bronze Star Medal in the applicant's service personnel records, the applicant may request this award under the provisions of Section 1130 of Title 10, United States Code. There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Further, the Purple Heart is not included in the list of authorized awards on the applicant's DD Form 214, which he authenticated with his signature.