Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016783
Original file (20110016783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016783 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, a former spouse of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states:

* They failed to follow-up within 1-year of their divorce on 9 May 2006
* The FSM intended for her to have SBP benefits following his death
* The FSM did not follow through regarding their divorce but he did make provisions in their divorce decree for her to have SBP benefits after his death

3.  The applicant provides:

* Settlement Agreement and divorce documents
* FSM's death certificate
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 March 1955 and remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments.  He married Dxxxxxx on 
27 October 1972.


2.  The FSM's record contains a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 8 January 1985, that shows he enrolled in the SBP and elected spouse only coverage, full amount.  This form shows Dxxxxxx, his spouse, was the designated beneficiary for unpaid retired pay or gratuity pay.

3.  He retired in the rank of command sergeant major on 31 March 1985.

4.  The FSM and Dorothy divorced on 9 May 2006.  

5.  The applicant provided a Settlement Agreement, dated 7 April 2006, which states "It is acknowledged and understood that Husband has contributed to the Survivor's Benefit Plan for Uniformed Service and that Wife is eligible to receive the benefits from said plan upon Husband's death.  Husband shall continue contributing to the plan with Wife as beneficiary.  The parties acknowledge that the current contribution to the Plan is at the maximum and the Husband agrees to maintain the contribution at the maximum allowed for the benefit of the Wife."

6.  On an unknown date, the FSM married Exxxxxxx.

7.  On 7 February 2011, the FSM died.  His death certificate shows he was married to Exxxxxxx.

8.  Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service show:

* the FSM had no eligible beneficiary for SBP
* that office was not notified of his marriage to Exxxxxxx

9.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name. 

10.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

11.  Public Law 98-94, enacted 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members.





12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

13.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not 
be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were noted.  However, SBP elections are made by category, not by name.  As long as she was the FSM's wife, she was the SBP beneficiary.  Once they divorced she was no longer a beneficiary.  

2.  There is no evidence to show the FSM requested that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage or that the applicant made a request for a deemed election within the statutory 1-year time limit.

3.  There is evidence to show the FSM remarried; however, the date is unknown.  At the 1-year anniversary of their marriage his spouse would have acquired a vested interest in the SBP as the FSM's legal beneficiary.  At this time we do not know if the FSM's spouse was vested.  

4.  The evidence presented is insufficient to grant the applicant the relief requested.  

5.  The applicant may seek reconsideration, if she is able to show the FSM's widow was not married to him for at least 1-year prior to his death or if the marriage length was of more than 1-year, she presents evidence showing the widow voluntarily relinquishes her entitlement to SBP or has been ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction.  




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016783



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016783



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011598

    Original file (20120011598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015527

    Original file (20080015527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election of her ex-spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his election to former spouse coverage. The FSM retired on 30 June 1998 and elected SBP spouse coverage. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage, and it appears the FSM did not change his election to former spouse coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015665C070206

    Original file (20050015665C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The DFAS letter provided by the applicant pertained to her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010711

    Original file (20110010711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, Mary, a former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states: * she and the FSM were married from January 1950 to June 1995 * when he retired in 1973, the FSM elected spouse only SBP coverage * the divorce decree directed the FSM to change his SBP election to former spouse coverage * neither she nor the FSM made a deemed election...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011391

    Original file (20060011391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. Although there is no evidence to show that either the FSM or the applicant requested that his SBP coverage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009877C070208

    Original file (20040009877C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004360

    Original file (20140004360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She is the former spouse of the FSM who retired from the Army in 1987. He and the applicant divorced on 14 January 2008. There is no evidence the FSM or the applicant made a deemed election to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012079

    Original file (20130012079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant, she and the FSM divorced on 1992. There is no evidence the FSM or the applicant made a deemed election to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012684

    Original file (20090012684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he participated in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage. This document shows the applicant requested that the Court equitably distribute the parties' retirement plans, including, in pertinent part, "Military Retirement, or any and all other forms of retirement and death or survivor's benefits." c. Thus, the evidence of record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019394

    Original file (20110019394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * She mailed a deemed election form and the divorce decree to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in a timely manner (January 2010) * Her request was initially denied by DFAS because they were unable to find the paperwork * The record reflects she did not file the paperwork within the proper time frame * It would be unjust to deny her SBP benefits because DFAS was unable to locate the records * It was the FSM's request per the Stipulation Agreement of...