Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016573
Original file (20110016573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	9 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016573 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show a second award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). 

2.  The applicant states he believes he is authorized an additional BSM that should have been issued to him sometime in 1968.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 
23 November 1965 and upon completion of initial entry training he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 21 July 1966 to 7 June 1967.  

4.  Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division General Orders Number 995, dated 
19 May 1967, awarded him the BSM with "V" (Valor) Device for actions on 
15 February 1967.  

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 22 November 1967.  Item 
24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the following:

* National Defense Service Medal
* BSM with "V" Device
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
* One Overseas Service Bar
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

6.  There is no evidence in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) indicating he was awarded a second BSM.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 and maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the BSM pertaining to the applicant.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged n military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show a second award of the BSM has been carefully considered.

2.  There is no evidence in his OMPF, and he provided none, substantiating his claim that he was awarded a second BSM.  No orders for the BSM pertaining to him were located in the ADCARS data base.

3.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_x____  __x______  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016573



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016573



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002530

    Original file (20140002530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS. The available evidence does not show the applicant was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS for actions in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his awards and decorations, as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017868

    Original file (20080017868.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 November 1965 through 28 September 1968. As a result, absent any evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant that shows he was awarded the BSM with oak leaf cluster while serving on active duty, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting this portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011335

    Original file (20090011335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 December 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011335 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's OMPF is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action or recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 27 May 1966 through 25 December 1968, and to add this award to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017292

    Original file (20110017292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 7 months, and 4 days of creditable active duty service and item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he received the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * ARCOM with "V" Device * Aircraft Crewman Badge (ACB) * Parachutist Badge * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * 2 Overseas Bars * Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004664

    Original file (20120004664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show two awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and all other awards to which he is entitled; and b. correction of his service number on his BSM Certificate and Citation. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records and he has not provided evidence that shows he was awarded a second BSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005684

    Original file (20110005684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which shows: * in item 27 (Military Education) – no entry * in item 28 (Specialized Training) – * Army Training Program (ATP) 21-114 [Basic Combat Training] * Code of Conduct * Basic Airborne Course * Chemical/Biological/Radiological (CBR) training * in item 38 (Record of Assignments) – conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" * in item 40 (Wounds) – gunshot wound right arm 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013515

    Original file (20140013515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of a certificate and citation stating that he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service for the period 3 November 1967 to 9 December 1968 while serving as an assistant operations sergeant at Fort Gordon, Georgia. There are no available general orders awarding the applicant the BSM with "V" Device or the ARCOM. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020836

    Original file (20130020836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he received two awards of the BSM during his Vietnam service * the first award was pinned on his chest in June 1968 * the second award was for heroism on 4 February 1969 * the first award of the BSM was put on his DD Form 214, but the second award was not * he received two awards of the Air Medal, one for actions on 4 August 1968 and one for actions on 20 February 1969 * there is only one award of the BSM and one award of the Air Medal on his DD Form 214 3. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027441

    Original file (20100027441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards) stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for this qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006985

    Original file (20090006985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 of the record copy of the FSM's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41. The applicant provided a copy of page 4 of the FSM's DA Form 20 showing the FSM was awarded the PH and the BSM.