IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 14 February 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110016343
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his record be corrected to show he qualifies for the Purple Heart (PH).
2. The applicant states his company commander was remiss in not presenting him the PH. He claims he was injured while building a bunker as result of enemy fire in July 1971. He states he was using a skill saw and an enemy firefight distracted him causing him to sever his finger with the saw causing a severe injury to his left hand.
3. The applicant refers to the firefight but provides no documentary evidence in support of the application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 October 1967, and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63H (Engine and Power Train Repairer). He was advanced to specialist four/E-4 on 22 November 1969, and this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.
3. The applicants DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 29 July 1969 through 28 July 1970. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour, he was assigned to the 61st and 79th Maintenance Companies, performing duties in MOS 63H as an engine and power train specialist and automobile mechanic. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and the PH is not included in the list of earned awards contained in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).
4. The applicants Military Personnel Records Jacket is void of orders or documents indicating he was wounded in action in the RVN. The record contains a Standard Form 88 (Record of Medical Examination), dated 4 September 1970, which documents the applicants separation medical examination. This document contains the entry deformity of 3rd and 4th finger caused by saw in VN in item 74 (Summary of Defects and Diagnosis). This document makes no reference to enemy action being involved in the accident.
5. On 11 September 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty, in the rank of SP4/E-4, after completing 2 years, 10 months, and 11 days of active military service. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards:
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* RVN Campaign Medal
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
6. During the review of this case, a member of the Board's staff reviewed the Vietnam Casualty Roster. This roster does not contain an entry pertaining to the applicant.
7. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, also failed to reveal any orders for the PH pertaining to the applicant.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy. Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the PH. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action. It also states in order to award the PH there must be evidence of the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants request for award of the PH has been carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this request.
2. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The applicants record is void of any entries or documents corroborating his claim that he was wounded in action in the RVN, or that shows he was treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN. He acknowledged that he did not seek treatment.
3. The applicants record is void of entries or documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action. Further, there are no documents in the applicant's MPRJ that indicate he was ever treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel during his tour in the RVN.
4. Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicants assertion that his hand injury was the result of or caused by enemy action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case. Therefore, it would not be appropriate or serve the interest of all those who served in the RVN and who faced similar circumstances to award the applicant the PH at this late date.
5. The applicant and all others concerned should know this action related to award of the PH in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ___X ___ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110016343
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110016343
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014381C071029
The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any documents or orders showing that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action, that the wound was treated by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012751
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. In this case, the evidence of record includes no indication that the applicant was ever wounded/injured in action, or that he was ever treated for a combat related wound/injury.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015004
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank and the PH is not included in the list of awards entered in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the member was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006673
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action, and that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel. Notwithstanding the VA documents provided, absent any evidence of record showing that the applicant was wounded as a result...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011989
However, by regulation, in order to award the PH it is necessary to establish that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by military medical personnel, and that a record of treatment was made a matter of official record. The evidence of record provides no indication that the applicant was ever wounded in action, or that he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury by military medical personnel. In order...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011304C070208
The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of active duty service shows he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), RVN Campaign Medal and Sharpshooter Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. The record provides no evidence that he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH, as evidenced by the absence of an entry in Item 40, and by the PH not being included in the list of authorized awards in Item 41 of his DA Form 20. Therefore, the Board requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020184
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy. The evidence of record fails to show the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related wound while serving in the RVN. The record fails to show he served in an infantry unit while in the RVN or that his MACV advisor duties included performance as an infantryman.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012721C080407
His record also contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 of his DA Form 20 or in the list of awards contained on his DD Form 214, which he authenticated with his signature on the date of his separation. Thus, absent any evidence of record to corroborate the information contained in the witness statements provided,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024418
Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received fair to "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008388
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 March 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050008388 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 September 1969 through 4 June 1970. As a result, the Board...