Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016285
Original file (20110016285.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    17 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016285 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) Written Agreement be reviewed and corrected.

2.  The applicant states the CSRB paperwork and contract were erroneously signed and dated 3 days too early.  This mistake was an inadvertent oversight and was not intentional, malicious, or fraudulent in nature.  The battalion S-1 (Personnel) prepared his CSRB paperwork and told him to sign on the date he was eligible.  However, the date was misread by the S-1 and the written agreement was signed on 22 August 2008, 3 days prior to his actual eligibility date.  He could have signed on any of the days on or after 25 August 2008 through the date he returned from deployment on 6 April 2009 and he would have still been eligible to receive the CSRB.  He has fulfilled his obligation in accordance with the CSRB Written Agreement.

3.  The applicant provides:

* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 337 (Oaths of Office)
* his Officer/Warrant Officer Written Agreement – Army Reserve Components (RC) Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB)
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* a letter from Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 244th Assault Helicopter Regiment, Hammond, LA, dated 17 March 2011
* a memorandum from Departments of the Army and Air Force, Joint Force Headquarters-Louisiana, Office of the Adjutant General (Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG)), dated 18 March 2011
* a memorandum from NGB, dated 20 March 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  He was commissioned as a second lieutenant/pay grade O-1 in the LAARNG on 25 August 2002.  He was promoted to captain/pay grade O-3 on 21 December 2006.

2.  On 24 March 2008, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom effective 16 April 2008.  He served in Iraq from 18 June 2008 to 6 April 2009.

3.  On 22 August 2008, he signed an Officer/Warrant Officer Written Agreement – Army Reserve Components (RC) Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB).

	a.  He acknowledged he had 6 or more years and not more than 12 years of commissioned service from his date of commission.

	b.  He agreed to continue to serve in the area of concentration designated as a critical skill for a period of 3 years from the date of the written agreement in order to receive a CSRB in the amount of $20,000.00.

4.  On 16 April 2009, he was released from active duty to his LAARNG unit.

5.  On 17 March 2011, his unit commander requested an exception to policy to allow him to keep his CSRB.  He stated the battalion S-1 misread the applicant's eligibility date and had him sign the CSRB addendum 3 days prior to having 6 years of commissioned service.  He stated the applicant is a great asset to the LAARNG.  He has served honorably and has abided by and fulfilled his service obligation as stated in the CSRB addendum.  He requested that because the discrepancy was solely an oversight by the S-1 personnel and no fault of the Soldier, an exception to policy be granted so he can receive the second half of his CSRB and that the first portion of his CSRB not be recouped.

6.  On 18 March 2011, the LAARNG Adjutant General requested an exception to policy to allow the applicant to receive final payment of the CSRB.  He had already received his first payment of $10,000.00 for this bonus.  To be eligible for the CSRB, he was required to have a minimum of 6 years of commissioned service.  Due to the S-1 for the 244th Aviation Command having misread his eligibility date, the applicant signed the CSRB addendum 3 days before he met the 6-year requirement.

7.  On 20 March 2011, NGB denied the LAARNG request for an exception to policy to allow the applicant to retain the CSRB incentive.  After a review of all substantiating documentation, NGB determined the CSRB Addendum the applicant signed is invalid and he is ineligible to retain the $20,000.00 CSRB.  NGB also stated the applicant could file an application with the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.

8.  He was promoted to major/pay grade O-4 effective 1 September 2011.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His claim for entitlement to a CSRB in the amount of $20,000.00 was carefully considered and was found to have merit.

2.  He signed the CSRB Written Agreement provided by the battalion S-1 in good faith that he was entitled to receive the bonus.  He completed the 3-year obligated service requirement and continues to serve in the LAARNG.  He should not be penalized for the S-1's error by having him sign the written agreement 3 days prior to having 6 years of commissioned service.

3.  Therefore, as matter of equity, it would be appropriate to change the date he signed his CSRB Written Agreement to 25 August 2008, the date he met the 
6-year commissioned service requirement.  As a result of the correction he should be reimbursed any recoupment of his initial payment of the CSRB.  He should be paid any subsequent payments in accordance with the terms of his CSRB Written Agreement.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
* 
changing the date he signed his Officer/Warrant Officer Written Agreement – Army RC CSRB to 25 August 2008
* showing he is eligible for payment of the CSRB in accordance with the terms of the CSRB Addendum
* reimbursing any previous recoupment of his initial payment of the CSRB
* paying out of Army National Guard funds any monies due as a result of this correction



      ___________X__________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016285



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016285



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016351

    Original file (20130016351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, approval of an exception to policy (ETP) allowing him to retain his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB). He provides: * self-authored memorandum, dated 30 August 2013 * Orders 317-1010, dated 12 November 2008 * Orders 216-1024, dated 4 August 2011 * Officer/Warrant Officer Written Agreement – Army Reserve Components (RC) CSRB * NGB memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for Officer CSRB (Applicant), dated 1 July 2013 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006765

    Original file (20120006765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. Paragraph 6i states that officers who meet the qualification and who execute a 3-year CSRB contract and service agreement will be paid $20,000.00. c. The applicant signed a CSRB agreement with the Ohio ARNG on 2 November 2008 in critical AOC 19A. The issue is confusing because NGB says his agreement shows his bonus AOC as 19A and his command says his bonus AOC was 19B, but the CSRB contract does not list any AOC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016518

    Original file (20130016518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a critical skills retention bonus (CSRB). The disapproval was based on: * the applicant not serving in the AOC for which contracted, as he moved into an AOC 19C position within 4 months of signing the CSRB agreement * CSRB agreement containing different signature dates from the applicant and the service representative * contract/bonus addendum not showing the critical AOC in the space provided (memorandum from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017840

    Original file (20130017840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in area of concentration (AOC) 11A (Infantry) [or AOC 53A (Automation Officer)]. The applicant indicated that he was eligible for a CSRB and that he would complete 6 years of commissioned service on 8 March 2009; the applicant was advised that he did not have to wait until 8 March 2009 to complete the agreement; he was provided instructions to place his initials in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015768

    Original file (20120015768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum states: * On 20 November 2008 the applicant qualified for the CSRB in the amount of $20,000.00 * He met the criteria for the CSRB and was issued a bonus control number * His unit contacted that office to inquire about his second half of the incentive * Unfortunately that office could not assist him with his payment due to the working copy of his CSRB being placed into his records rather than the signed documents * The unit has recognized this error and has taken the necessary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007314

    Original file (20120007314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official states in order to be eligible for the CSRB, ARNG officers must: a. be serving in the ARNG in the grade of captain (except for chaplains and Judge Advocates); b. have completed any current contractual obligation or bonus contract as a result of participation in either the Officer Accession or Affiliation Bonus; c. be fully qualified in one of the designated critical skills and extend in an Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTO&E) or "deployable" Table of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009709

    Original file (20140009709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he received an officer CSRB in 2008 while on Title 10 orders overseas * in late 2013 the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) was audited for administration of its bonus incentive program * he was notified that his bonus was to be recouped due to wording on his orders, lack of a bonus control number, and lack of dates on his contract * he was told to submit an exception to policy (ETP) to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) * NGB denied his request and provided a number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020404

    Original file (20130020404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An NGB official stated although the applicant was eligible for the CSRB with the INARNG on 6 December 2008 in the critical AOC of 25A, he failed to sign a CSRB Written Agreement. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense memorandum, dated 12 December 2007, approved payment of bonus to ARNG and USAR officers who agree to serve in an active status for not less than 3 years in certain AOCs designated as critical for the CSRB in accordance with Title 37, U.S. Code, section 323. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000505

    Original file (20140000505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he made a valid contract with the U.S. Government to receive the CRSB and detrimentally relied on the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) incentive system for receiving the SLRP * he received the incentive payments around May and June 2008 * he fulfilled his obligations for those incentives and it would be unjust and contrary to good conscience to recoup them * he received notification from the CAARNG Incentive Task Force (ITF) that he owed $83,000.00 for an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021245

    Original file (20120021245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The exception to policy memorandum stated he: * had been issued a control number via Information Management and Reporting Center (iMARC) * executed a CSRB addendum for AOC 19A on 10 April 2008 * received the first installment of $10,000 on 15 May 2008 * the second installment was rejected because his AOC was not listed as a critical AOC on the NGB's approved list of AOCs that qualified for the bonus 21. The applicant's primary skill, 19A, was not a designated skill for the bonus and there...