Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016239
Original file (20110016239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016239 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's military records to show she had properly and timely applied for Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits.

2.  The applicant states when the FSM passed away in 1996, she called the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Cleveland, OH.  She contends that she was informed she had to wait until she was either 65 years of age, or disabled.  When she became disabled, she applied for the FSM's military retirement benefit; however, she was then told it was too late because of the statute of limitations.  She feels cheated out of money that is rightfully hers because she was wrongfully informed.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the FSM's Certificate of Death.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 


substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM's National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23B (Army National Guard Retirement (ARNG) Points History Statement), prepared on 15 February 1995, indicates that the FSM had completed 20 qualifying years for retired pay.

3.  A Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter), dated 
15 February 1995, informed the FSM that he had attained this eligibility.

4.  On 17 February 1995, a first endorsement to the FSM's 20-Year Letter informed the FSM about the SBP and the requirements for participation.

5.  A DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) dated 4 March 1995 indicates that the FSM elected full SBP coverage for his spouse and children, under Option C for immediate coverage.  The FSM's stepchild was identified as born in 1978.  The form was signed and witnessed on 4 March 1995.

6.  His NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 1 September 1995 reports that the FSM was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  He had completed 20 years, 6 months, and 7 days of total service for pay.

7.  The FSM's Certificate of Death reports that he died on 7 July 1996.  The applicant is identified thereon as his spouse.

8.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  If the member dies before reaching age 60, premiums are deducted from the annuity.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the FSM's military records should be corrected to show she properly and timely applied for SBP benefits because she was misinformed by DFAS about how and when to apply for these benefits.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows the FSM completed over 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay and he properly and timely submitted his SBP election.  The FSM elected spouse and children coverage with Option C for immediate coverage.

3.  The Certificate of Death provided by the applicant reports the FSM died on
7 July 1996.  Accordingly, she was eligible to apply for SBP coverage for herself and her child.

4.  There is no reason to doubt the applicant's contention that she timely attempted to apply for SBP benefits and unfortunately was misinformed about when to apply.  She should not have to suffer the consequences of such misinformation.

5.  In view of the foregoing, the FSM's military records should be corrected to show the applicant had properly and timely applied for the SBP benefits due her and her child.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the applicant had properly and timely filed for SBP benefits immediately after the FSM's death;


	b.  the appropriate office timely received and processed the applicant's application; and

	c.  paying the applicant all SBP annuities due commencing the day after the FSM's date of death.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016239



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016239



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011212

    Original file (20130011212.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for Reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 (and eligible to participate in SBP), to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the FSM be corrected by showing he submitted his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005830C070205

    Original file (20060005830C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060005830 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Donald Steenfott | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Evidence of record shows the FSM’s 20-Year Letter was dated 3 December 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018429

    Original file (20070018429.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "None" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM completed the DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) in 1995 when he was unmarried, electing no coverage since he was single at the time. When the FSM received his 20-Year Letter on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018505

    Original file (20090018505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that upon receiving his 20-year letter, the FSM submitted an SBP Election Certificate on 30 October 1990, in which he elected full immediate spouse and children RCSBP coverage. The evidence of record further shows subsequent to his death, his spouse, the applicant, requested an annuity be started based on his death and she received a letter on 2 October 1995 from USAHRC-STL confirming her entitlement to the annuity. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007559

    Original file (20120007559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 April 2011, by letter to DFAS, the applicant stated: * She had enclosed the necessary documentation DFAS requested regarding the FSM's death * She had been informed the last retirement payment would be made via direct deposit, and further payments would be terminated due to the FSM's death * She understood she was not entitled to compensation regarding his retirement pay because she was not his dependent * She was designated as his natural insurable interest SBP beneficiary on his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012264

    Original file (20080012264.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP on 12 September 1994, after receiving his 20-Year Letter. The FSM retired on 12 March 1995, subsequently died on 21 July 1995, and DFAS officials confirm that the applicant was never paid an SBP annuity as a result of the FSM’s death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by providing the applicant the Survivor Benefit Plan annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017536

    Original file (20130017536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The applicant contends that the FSM's records should be corrected to show his SBP election was changed from spouse to former spouse coverage because the divorce judgment required the FSM to maintain SBP with former spouse coverage for the applicant. There is no evidence that the applicant notified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017536

    Original file (20130017536 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The applicant contends that the FSM's records should be corrected to show his SBP election was changed from spouse to former spouse coverage because the divorce judgment required the FSM to maintain SBP with former spouse coverage for the applicant. There is no evidence that the applicant notified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002751

    Original file (20080002751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the FSM's record to show that he completed the necessary application for retired pay at age 60, which included a SBP election for full spouse only coverage, and that this application was approved; and by voiding his 14 April 1995 discharge from the USAR and to instead show he was placed on the Retired List and became entitled to retired pay on that same date. Further, it would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028722

    Original file (20100028722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides one of the FSM's Retiree Account Statements with an effective date of 5 December 2005. The statement shows the FSM elected spouse-only SBP coverage and shows his spouse's DOB as 27 September 1948. It would be appropriate to correct his DFAS records to show he elected former spouse coverage and option B under the RCSBP.