Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015950
Original file (20110015950.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  8 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015950 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code for his period of active duty from 9 February to 24 June 1994.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not have his RE code.

3.  The applicant provides a statement of service from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 5 January 1994.  He was ordered to initial active duty for training effective 9 February 1994.

3.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 54B (Chemical Operations Specialist).

4.  On 24 June 1994, he was released from active duty by reason of his completion of his period of active duty for training.  Block 24 (Reentry code) of his DD Form 214 contains the entry NA (not applicable).

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214.  Table 2-1 provided the requirements for completing the entries in the blocks on the DD Form 214.  According to the table Reserve Component personnel being separated for other than cause will not be assigned RE codes.  The entry in Block 27 in these cases would be NA.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

He was not released from active duty for cause.  The reason for him being released from active duty was completion of a period of active duty for training.  The correct entry in Block 27 of his DD Form 214 for this period is NA.  Therefore, the entry in Block 27 of his DD Form 214 for the period of service from 9 February to 24 June 1994 is correct.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015950





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015950



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005056

    Original file (AR20130005056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve on 8 August 1993, for a period of 8 years. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Personality Disorder,” and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003903

    Original file (20090003903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. The evidence of record shows that the two periods of active service (as outlined in paragraphs 2b and 3b, above) are accurately documented (in item 12, blocks d and c, respectively) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 19 August 1994. e. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s period of net active service this period is accurately documented on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 16 August 2002. e. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003227

    Original file (20090003227.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty in the RA this period on 14 April 1978 and was honorably retired from active duty on 31 March 1994 based on sufficient service for retirement. The evidence of record further shows that these two periods of inactive and active service are accurately documented on the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 18 March 1971. As a result, the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011516

    Original file (20080011516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “uncharacterized” to “honorable” and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from "NA" to "RE-1." Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012159

    Original file (20100012159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also states, "Reserve Component personnel being separated for other than cause will not be assigned RE codes. The evidence of record further shows the governing Army regulation states that RC [USAR] personnel being separated for other than cause will not be assigned RE codes and that "NA" will be entered in item 27 of the DD Form 214. Thus, the evidence of record confirms that the entry in item 27 of the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 April 1991 is correct as shown.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018136C070206

    Original file (20050018136C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his 1980 and 1995 reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes, correction of the status of his period of service in 1994 and 1995, correction of his pay grade to E-5, and separation pay for the years of 1980, 1986, and 1995. A 27 June 1975 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation) indicates the applicant was honorably discharged under the Trainee Discharge Program (Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5 as then in effect). These codes are contained on military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014374

    Original file (20090014374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that item 14 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he completed BNCOC in 2004. However, the evidence of record shows the DA Form 1059 the applicant submits is not filed in his OMPF. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show he completed all phases on BNCOC prior to his discharge to support correction of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007527

    Original file (20090007527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned reentry eligibility (RE) codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record shows that, because she was separated for cause, the applicant's RE code should be "3." ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009728

    Original file (AR20130009728.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Soldiers being...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003592

    Original file (AR20090003592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Except for the forgoing modifications to the applicant's separation (SPD) code and the reentry eligibility (RE) code, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and...