Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015946
Original file (20110015946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  21 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015946 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests extension of his household goods (HHG) transportation termination date.

2.  The applicant states that during transition processing prior to his retirement from the U.S. Army, "the lady at the desk" informed him he had 5 years to use his HHG transportation benefit.  However, he was not informed of the requirement to request extension of the entitlement on an annual basis.

	a.  He retired from active duty in 2009 and he planned to stay in the Fort Knox, KY area.  He later found employment at Fort Campbell, KY and he attempted to utilize his HHG transportation benefit.

	b.  He was instructed to request an exception to policy because he had not requested extension of the benefit at the end of each 1-year period.  However, his request for exception to policy was denied by the installation transportation officer.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the denial of his request for extension of the travel and transportation entitlement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 19 August 1986.  He reenlisted in the RA and continued to serve on active duty.  He was promoted to sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 on 1 October 2002.
2.  Orders 200-0159, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor Center, Fort Knox, dated 18 July 2008, released the applicant from active duty on 31 March 2009 and placed him on the Retired List effective 1 April 2009.

	a.  His home of record (HOR) is shown as "Jewett, OH."

	b.  The additional instructions show:
   
* "You are authorized shipment of household goods."
* "You are authorized up to one year to complete selection of a home and complete travel in connection with this action."

3.  A DD Form 2648 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist for Active Component Service Members), dated 25 August 2008, shows the applicant indicated his desire for counseling regarding services and benefits related to his travel and transportation allowances.

4.  A DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows the applicant entered active duty this period on 19 August 1986, he was honorably retired from active duty on 31 March 2009 in the rank of SFC, and he transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired).

	a.  He completed 22 years, 7 months, and 12 days of creditable active service.

	b.  Item 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) shows an address in Rineyville, Kentucky.

5.  In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of an Installation Management Command, Southeast Region, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Campbell, memorandum, dated 25 May 2011, subject:  Extension of Travel and Transportation Entitlements Denied, that shows the installation transportation officer denied the applicant's request under the provisions of Joint Federal Travel Regulation, Volume I, paragraph U5360-G.

6.  The Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), Volume 1, Uniformed Service Members, Chapter 5 (Permanent Duty Travel), Part D (HHG Transportation and Storage), section 7 (Retirement, Temporary Duty Retired List, Discharge with Severance/Separation Pay, or Involuntary Release from Active Duty with Readjustment or Separation Pay), governs home of selection (HOS) authorization and storage of HHG.


	a.  A member on active duty is authorized HHG transportation from the last or any previous permanent duty station, from a continental United States designated place, from anywhere the member elects, from storage, or any combination thereof, to the member's HOS.

	b.  A member or dependent authorized HHG transportation is authorized non-temporary storage (NTS).  The authority begins on the date the order is issued and terminates 1 year from the active duty termination date.

	c.  An extension of the 1-year time limit may be authorized/approved through the Secretarial process when an unexpected event beyond the member's control occurs which prevents the member from moving to the HOS within the specified time limit.

	d.  These extensions may be authorized/approved only for the specific period of time the member anticipates is needed to complete the move.  If, at the expiration of this extension period, additional time is required, the member may request a further extension through the Secretarial process citing the reasons for the extension.   An additional authorized period for a specific period of time may then be authorized/approved through the Secretarial process.

	e.  An extension under "other deserving cases" (for any reason) may not be authorized/approved if it extends travel and transportation allowances for more than 6 years from the date of separation or release from active duty or retirement.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his 1-year HHG transportation termination date of
31 March 2010 should be extended for a period of 3 years (to 31 March 2013) because he was not informed of the requirement to request extension of the entitlement on an annual basis.

2.  Records show the applicant was issued orders on 18 July 2008 that released him from active duty on 31 March 2009.  The orders specifically advised him he was authorized up to 1 year (i.e., until 31 March 2010) to complete travel/ movement in connection with his retirement from active service.  In addition, records show relocation assistance pertaining to travel and transportation allowances was available to the applicant and that he requested counseling for the benefit.


3.  There is no evidence the applicant submitted a request for extension of his HHG transportation termination date of 31 March 2010 prior to that date.  In fact, the applicant acknowledges he did not do so because he contends he was not informed of the requirement.

4.  The sincerity of the applicant's contention is not in question.  It is noted that the applicant's official orders provided for a 1-year period to use his travel entitlement.  However, he relied on information from a "lady at the desk" that he had 5 years to use his transportation benefits without understanding how to request extension of the 1-year period authorized in his orders.

5.  Based on the applicant's rank and years of military service, coupled with the instructions in his orders and the evidence of record, it is reasonable to conclude he clearly understood his HHG transportation entitlement expiration date.  It is also reasonable to conclude if he did not fully understand his HHG entitlements, he was aware that there were transportation support services available to him.  Therefore, the applicant's contention he was misinformed about the authorized period of his transportation entitlement and the process of requesting extension of the 1-year period is not credible.

6.  In view of the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015946



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015946



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003397

    Original file (20120003397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * retirement orders, dated 11 December 2007 * recall to active duty orders, dated 15 May 2008 * request for extension of final HHG and NTS entitlements * letter from U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison-Redstone, Redstone Arsenal, AL, dated 21 January 2009 * a letter from the Transportation Office, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison-Redstone, dated 3 January 2012 * request for further extension of final HHG and NTS entitlements *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000417

    Original file (20110000417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his 1-year HHG transportation termination date of 31 August 2009 should be extended for a period of 2 years (to 31 August 2011) because he deployed overseas for civilian employment shortly after he retired from active duty and was misinformed about his HHG NTS and movement entitlement. There is no evidence the applicant submitted a request for extension of the 1-year extension of his HHG transportation termination date of 31 August 2009, prior to that date. In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006506

    Original file (20080006506.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter to the Senator's office further reads that the applicant's orders erroneously authorized the transportation of HHG to an HOS instead of his HOR or place of entry on active duty and that the transportation office incorrectly advised the applicant that the time limit was 1 year. The Senator's office was informed by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, that if requested by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, they will support the applicant's request for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012149

    Original file (20140012149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably retired on 31 January 2011. The JFTR indicates that retirement travel and transportation entitlements will be used within 1 year of retirement; however, it also provides for extensions of this entitlement in 1-year increments up to 5 additional years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant timely requested and received approval for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009311

    Original file (20110009311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. she calculates the NTS fee based on the quote from a Fort McPherson, GA transportation agent which was $43.18 per month (from December 2009 to March 2011 is 15 months (15 x $43.18 = $647.70)). She was expecting to move her HHG this year (2011) using her NTS entitlements. However, the advisory opinion points out that on 17 October 2005, the Fort McPherson Transportation Office informed the applicant via email that she was responsible for all costs involved with storage beyond 1 year past...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015263

    Original file (20110015263.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The transportation office explained that she had two years to complete her final move, but she would need to request an extension after one year. Notwithstanding the Department of the Army G-4's email message that extension is not authorized, it seems appropriate to show the applicant's request for extension and reinstatement of her HHG shipment entitlements was approved through 30 September 2012 (4 years after her retirement). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019989

    Original file (20100019989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The original SIT entitlements for individuals retiring is normally 90 days and the applicant has already received what amounts to three additional extensions which has resulted in his SIT entitlements being extended for 1 year. The applicant contends that he should be granted an additional 15-month extension of his SIT in order to complete a 2-year college program; however, he has failed to show how his present situation amounts to reasons beyond his control or sufficient explanation why...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011305

    Original file (20130011305.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show approval for additional extensions of his retirement transportation entitlement. The evidence of record supports the applicant's request for reinstatement of his expired transportation entitlement. The applicant's retirement orders clearly state his transportation entitlement would expire within a year and the record shows a request for extension of his entitlement was approved within a year of his retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007095

    Original file (20120007095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she timely requested an extension of her entitlement to ship her household goods (HHG) to her home of selection (HOS). Travel and transportation entitlements expire 6 years from the date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing she timely requested extension of her travel and transportation entitlements on 30 April 2010 that was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016966

    Original file (20130016966.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record shows that she received her retroactive retirement on 16 April 2013 and, accordingly, her initial transportation entitlements expired one year, later on 16 April 2014. Further, in accordance with the DCS G4's advisory opinion it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to correct her record to reinstate her transportation entitlement to allow her the opportunity to request subsequent extensions through 16 April 2019 (6 years after the date she received her...