Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015944
Original file (20110015944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  22 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015944 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment of a $15,000 Prior Service Enlistment Bonus to which he is entitled for enlisting in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of 6 years.

2.  The applicant states he was told he qualified for the bonus and contends that nowhere in his enlistment contract does it state that his previous general discharge under honorable conditions renders him ineligible for receiving the bonus.  He further states he attended two military occupational specialty (MOS) producing schools and lived up to his contract while the Army has not.  He attests that if this bonus is not paid to him he will spend his life wasting the Government's money in court.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 5261-5 (Selected Reserve Incentive Program - USAR Prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum), dated 29 September 2008
* Reserves Annex, dated 29 September 2008
* MOS orders, dated 13 January 2011
* Two letters from the Deputy Director, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Headquarters, USAR Command (USARC), dated 7 July 2010 and 7 April 2011




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record contains a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which shows he initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 January 1997.  On 19 February 1999, he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Separations) as a result of misconduct.  His service was characterized as general, under honorable conditions.  He completed of 2 years, 1 month, and 10 days of creditable active duty service.

2.  On 29 September 2008, the applicant enlisted in the USAR for a period of 6 years and he was scheduled to complete training for MOS 92F (Petroleum Supply Specialist).  The DA Form 5261-5 he completed at the time shows in:

	a.  Section III (Acknowledgement) that in connection with his enlistment in the USAR for the prior service enlistment bonus he acknowledged he met five eligibility criteria.  Item 5 states "I am in receipt of an honorable discharge issued on separation from prior military service."

	b.  Section V (Entitlement) of this form shows he attested he was eligible for a prior service enlistment bonus in the amount of $15,000 in return for enlisting for a period of 6 years.  Initial payment of 50 percent (%) of the bonus would be paid upon award of the appropriate MOS, and 25% of the total bonus would be paid at the end of his 2nd and 4th years of satisfactory service in a USAR Selected Reserve Unit.

	c.  Section IX (Statement of Understanding) he indicated he had read and understood each of the statements above and had his questions satisfactorily answered.  He understood the statements above were intended to constitute all promises and agreements, whatsoever, concerning his enlistment for prior service enlistment bonus.  Any other promise, representation, or commitment made to him in connection with his enlistment for this bonus had been entered below in his own handwriting, or they had been waived.  He authenticated this document with his signature on 29 September 2008.  There are no additional handwritten entries on this document.  

3.  On 29 September 2008, the applicant also completed a Reserves Annex to his enlistment contract.  Section IX (Addendums) of his Certificate and Acknowledgement USAR Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment document shows the aforementioned DA Form 5261-5 was an integral portion of his enlistment contract.  The Authentification portion of this document, in part, shows the applicant:

	a.  acknowledged he was required to reveal all prior military service.

	b.  stated he had provided his recruiter and guidance counselor all information concerning his qualifications and that no official in the U.S. Army or any other agency had advised him to conceal, nor had he concealed, information in connection with his enlistment.

	c.  stated he had provided his recruiter and/or guidance counselor all information required on his application for enlistment.  He certified he had read and fully understood the contents of this form and that no one had told him to conceal information.  He authenticated this document with his signature on 29 September 2008.

4.  The applicant provides a letter addressed to a Representative in Congress from the Deputy Director, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Headquarters, USARC, dated 7 July 2010, which was rendered in response to an inquiry on the applicant's behalf.  The Deputy Director informed the Representative the applicant was not currently eligible to receive his initial bonus payment because he had not completed training in critical MOS 92F, for which he had contracted, within 24 months of his enlistment date.  The Deputy Director acknowledged the applicant's unit leadership had elected to send him to training for the less critical MOS 92L (Petroleum Laboratory Specialist) and in an effort not to penalize him for this decision, the applicant was given an additional 12 months to complete MOS training for 92F.  If he completed this training within the required timeframe, he would then be eligible for payment of the bonus.

5.  Headquarters, 99th Regional Support Command, Fort Dix, NJ Orders 
11-013-00066, dated 13 January 2011, awarded the applicant MOS 92F as his primary MOS.

6.  The applicant provides a letter addressed to a Representative in Congress from the Deputy Director, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Headquarters, USARC, dated 7 April 2011, which was rendered in response to an inquiry on the applicant's behalf.  The Deputy Director informed the Representative that research had revealed the applicant was not entitled to receive the Prior Service Enlistment Bonus.  The Deputy Director acknowledged the applicant was initially informed that he did not qualify for the bonus due to failure to complete mandatory training within the required timeframe.  However, additional research revealed he was also ineligible due to his prior discharge status.  He noted the applicant received an "Under Honorable Conditions (General)" discharge on 19 February 1999.  The Deputy Director cited the facts that Army policy prohibits Soldiers who did not receive an honorable discharge at the conclusion of all periods of prior service from receiving the Prior Service Enlistment Bonus and the USAR does not have the authority to grant an exception to policy in this case.
He noted the U.S. Army Recruiting Command had been made aware of this situation and they would investigate as they deemed appropriate.  The Deputy Director concluded by stating if the applicant believed there was a breach of contract he could elect one of the following options:

	a.  Remain in his unit as a drilling reservist without receipt of a bonus.

	b.  Request a discharge in accordance with Army regulatory guidance.

	c.  Apply to this Board to pursue any perceived injustices.

7.  Army Regulation 135-7 (Army National Guard (ARNG) and Army Reserve - Incentive Programs) prescribes policies and procedures for the administration of the ARNG and the USAR incentive programs.  Incentives and entitlements prescribed by this regulation may specify that an applicant be in a non-prior service, prior service, or in service status.  They may also mandate the completion of specified initial entry training.  Soldiers will have their incentive eligibility and entitlement stopped when any of the termination reasons apply as listed within the applicable chapters of this regulation.  This regulation provides that a Prior Service Enlistment Bonus is offered to any person who meets several requirements, to include having received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of his or her last period of military service.  Once being declared ineligible, termination of bonus will not affect a Soldier's responsibility to serve his or her current statutory or contractual service commitment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is entitled to receive payment of a $15,000 Prior Service Enlistment Bonus was carefully considered and determined to lack merit.

2.  The evidence shows the applicant served in the Regular Army from 10 January 1997 to 19 February 1999, at which time he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 for misconduct.  As a result, his service was characterized as general, under honorable conditions.

3.  The evidence also shows that when the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 29 September 2008, he indicated he was eligible for the Prior Service Enlistment Bonus by falsely stating he had received an honorable discharge for his prior military service.  He certified he had read and fully understood the contents of his contract and that no one had told him to conceal information and authenticated the contract with his signature.

4.  Army policy precludes individuals who did not receive an honorable discharge at the conclusion of all periods of prior service from receiving the Prior Service Enlistment Bonus.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  __X______  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015944



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015944



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013223

    Original file (20110013223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 December 2006 in the grade of specialist/E-4 for a period of 8 years. The USARC, Deputy Chief of Staff, also stated that the applicant was authorized to retain the $10,000 OAB and was also authorized payment of any earned portions of the $4,000 High Grad Bonus and the $5,000 NPSEB Ship Bonus. A request for exception to policy from the USARC, G-1, approved the applicant to retain the $10,000 OAB and payment of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005744

    Original file (20080005744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, payment of a Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB) guaranteed in his 28 April 2007 Enlistment Contract (DD Form 4). However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim. Notwithstanding the G-1 recommendation to honor the applicant’s enlistment contract by paying him the $15,000 PSEB; the law prohibits payment of this incentive if a member has in excess of 16 years of prior service at the time of enlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016516

    Original file (20110016516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of a $10,000 officer accession bonus (OAB). The applicant states: * He previously served in an enlisted status and received a reenlistment bonus but he was commissioned as an Adjutant General (AG) officer in April 2008 * He executed a contract wherein he agreed to serve for 6 years in return for a $10,000 OAB * He completed the Basic Officer Leader Course (BOLC), Phases II and III and as stipulated in his agreement and he met his obligation in September 2009 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011361

    Original file (20100011361.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he is eligible for a Reenlistment Bonus and the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) as stated in his reenlistment contract. The applicant's military records show he reenlisted on 8 June 2005 for a period of six years in the United States Army Reserve. The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered into a reenlistment contract that included authorization for a $15,000 Reenlistment Bonus and SLRP benefits not to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003172

    Original file (20130003172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His USAR Prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum, dated 19 June 2007, shows: * he acknowledged he had less than 16 years of military service and that he was enlisting for 6 years for a bonus of $15,000 * he was required to qualify for military occupational specialty (MOS) 21R (Interior Electrician) * his counselor certified he met the eligibility requirements 5. Army Regulation 135-7 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Incentive Programs), in effect at the time of the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013329

    Original file (20090013329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Senator, the U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) and the DA G-1 have denied his request for payment, citing that he was not eligible for the bonus at the time of his commissioning. The Deputy Director informed the Senator that the applicant was not eligible for the Officer Accession Bonus due to the fact that his AOC of 35D was not on the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) eligibility roster at the time he signed his enlistment contract. The Deputy Director informed the Senator that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001990

    Original file (20120001990.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, full payment of a $10,000 prior-service enlistment bonus (PSEB). He provides: * a letter to a Member of Congress from the Deputy Director, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) * his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 19 February 2004 * a Certificate and Acknowledgement – U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) – Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment * three DA Forms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012703

    Original file (20100012703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she is eligible for Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) benefits. She further states, in effect, that a corrected Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) list for the same year showed her military occupational specialty (MOS) was not listed for the SLRP at the time she reenlisted. The evidence of record shows that the applicant reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve for an indefinite period of service of not less than 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006098

    Original file (20130006098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for 6 years on 9 April 2006 * he contracted for a reenlistment bonus and the SLRP * 2 years after he signed his contract, he applied for his first payment of the SLRP * his request was denied because the military occupational specialty (MOS) in which he reenlisted was not approved for the SLRP * he has now completed the 6-year term he reenlisted for in 2006 and has reenlisted again * he would like to know how a contract...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010592

    Original file (20090010592.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a DA Form 1559, dated 4 June 2008, which shows he submitted a request to the Office of the IG at Fort Leavenworth in order to obtain its assistance with receiving payment of his $6,000.00 Officer Accession Bonus entitlement. The DA G-1 recommended disapproval of the applicant's request since 35D was not an authorized critical skill for the Officer Accession Bonus at the time of the applicant's enlistment or at the time he was commissioned. The evidence shows that AOC...