Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015618
Original file (20110015618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015618 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests retirement pay as a captain.

2.  The applicant states he served in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) as an officer while serving in the Regular Army (RA) as a noncommissioned officer (NCO).  He should be retired as an officer because of his dual status.  After 30 years of total service he should be advanced to captain, and receive retired pay at that rank.  Specifically, he contends that the governing regulation, Army Regulation 600-38 (Dual Component Personnel Management Program), does not require active duty service. 

3.  The applicant provides a 27 November 1990 memorandum promoting him to captain in the USAR, officer evaluation reports (OERs) for periods ending 31 January 1990, 11 July 1983 and 11 July 1980.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 


has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the RA in October 1967 and was discharged in August 1970.  Following about a year in the USAR and a few months in the Army National Guard, he re-joined the Regular Army in March 1972 and became a career NCO.  

3.  The applicant applied for a USAR commission under the dual component program.  In March 1979, he accepted an appointment as a USAR
2nd lieutenant.  Thereafter; he performed duties as both an active duty NCO and as a USAR officer.

4.  On 31 March 1992 the applicant retired from active duty as a master sergeant, pay grade E-8.  He had 20 years and 12 days of service during this period on continuous active duty.

5.  Army Regulation 600-38 sates in:

	a.  paragraph 5.  Concept.  Mobilization requirements of DA for officers must be met swiftly through procurement of trained commissioned and warrant officers.  Members presently on active duty afford ready assets during times of rapid expansion of the Active component.  They can be mobilized to assume greater responsibilities quickly.  Career planning and management of dual component members are vital to the use of these assets in time of war or national emergency.

	b.  paragraph 26. Retirement.  Various Laws govern retirement of dual component members.  Warrant officers or enlisted members may retire voluntarily in a commissioned officer status (Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3911) if they meet both of the following conditions:

		(1) They have completed 10 years of active commissioned service in their overall total of 20 years, active Federal service, and

		(2) They hold a USAR Commission at the time of retirement.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The governing regulation states that dual component Soldiers may retire as officers if they have 10 years of active commissioned service in their overall total of 20 years, active Federal service.

2.  Clearly the wording, "active Federal service" makes it clear that this means active duty service.  Furthermore the wording, "Active component" used in the Concept paragraph reinforces this meaning.

3.  In view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015618



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015618



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009125

    Original file (20120009125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his dual component status so he can be reissued a military identification (ID) card showing his rank as major (MAJ). The applicant provides: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records), dated 27 July 2012 * DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel), dated 17 November 1980 * letter of appointment to CPT in the USAR * letter of promotion to MAJ in the USAR CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006990

    Original file (20120006990.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show advancement on the Retired List to the rank/grade of captain (CPT)/O-3. She adds: * she was told by an official of the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) that her dual status does not qualify her for advancement * this contradicts what she was told in 2005/2006 as she retired from the Army * she was in a dual status, serving in the Regular Army as an enlisted Soldier while holding a Reserve commission * she communicated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016602

    Original file (20100016602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no provisions allowing for the continuation of members in a dual component status subsequent to their length of service retirement from active duty. It states that warrant officer and enlisted members of the Army are entitled, when their active service plus their service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily. Given the applicant never served on active duty in a commissioned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006209C071113

    Original file (20070006209C071113.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows that she served on active duty as a Major. Further, advancement of enlisted members to a commissioned officer rank and pay grade on the Retired List requires that the member actually held and satisfactorily served in that higher commissioned officer grade while on active duty. The evidence of record further shows that while serving on active duty in an enlisted status, the applicant was promoted to MAJ/0-4 in the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009433C070208

    Original file (20040009433C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    By memorandum dated 24 September 2002, and apparently received by him on or about 10 October 2002, the applicant was notified that, even though he had not been recommended for promotion, a Selective Continuation board recommended him for continuation in his present grade. Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) states that a commissioned officer vacates his Army Reserve appointment when he accepts a Regular Army appointment in a commissioned grade; accepts a promotion to a higher...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016533

    Original file (20130016533.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. there is no evidence she ever performed any duties as a Reserve officer on active duty from 1988 to 2006; however, she provides evidence that she performed duties and training as a Reserve officer in the Active Army. The applicant served in a dual status as an enlisted Soldier in the Regular Army and as a Reserve commissioned officer in the USAR. Although the evidence shows she held a Reserve commission from 1988 to 2006, this duty was in a Reserve status, not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008877

    Original file (20140008877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During his initial enlistment he was commissioned as a reserve officer in May 1986 and later entered on active duty in June 1987 without a break in service. For advancement to a commissioned officer grade, the Soldier must have served satisfactorily on active duty in this grade for not less than 6 months. Warrant officers and enlisted members of the Army are entitled, when their active service plus their service on the retired list totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015621

    Original file (20140015621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 March 1976 to show he was retired in the rank/grade of Chief Warrant Officer Three (CW3)/W-3. It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The DD Form 214 provides a record of a Soldier's active Army service at the time of release from active duty and does not reflect other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056997C070420

    Original file (2001056997C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004322

    Original file (20140004322 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * there is no record of her service as a dual component (Regular Army (RA)) enlisted and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) commission) * she was informed at the time of commission and upon her active duty retirement that she would be eligible at age 62 for retired pay at the highest grade held * there appears to be an error in her records as there is no record of discharge (DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from the USAR * she retired from active...