Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015570
Original file (20110015570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  9 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015570 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show:

   a.   his service in Honduras and Germany;
   
   b.  he completed SRT [Special Reaction Team] training; and
   
   c.  he was a member of the M-60 machinegun team.	

2.  The applicant states:

* His DD Form 214 is not complete
* His tours of duty in Honduras or Germany are not shown
* There is no record of SRT training or that he was a member of the M-60 machinegun team
* He was rushed out of the Army before his 3-year enlistment
* He was forced to resign after failing a drug test upon his return from Honduras
* He spent 3 days in a psychiatric ward 
* He suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder because of his tour in Honduras
* He cannot get treatment  



3.  The applicant provides:

* Letter, dated 19 July 2011, from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA)
* Medical record, dated 31 October 1986
* Photograph of himself in Honduras
* DVA card
* Service medical records, dated 1986
* Award certificate for the Army Achievement Medal
* Certificate of achievement
* DD Form 214
* Page 4 of his separation packet

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 December 1983.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 95B (military police).  On 30 December 1986, he was discharged under honorable conditions for misconduct.

3.  Item 12f (Foreign Service) of his DD Form 214 shows no foreign service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show a marksmanship qualification badge with machinegun bar as an authorized award.  Item 14 (Military Education) shows he completed the 16-week law enforcement course in 1984.

4.  Item 5 (Oversea Service) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) is blank.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 does not show entitlement to a marksmanship qualification badge with machinegun bar.

5.  He provided an award certificate for the Army Achievement Medal and a certificate of achievement which state he was deployed to the Federal Republic of Germany during Reforger in 1984.

6.  He provided a medical record, dated 31 October 1986, which indicates he served in Honduras.

7.  There is no evidence which shows he completed SRT training.

8.  There are no orders which show he was awarded a marksmanship qualification badge with machinegun bar.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the policies and procedures for completion and distribution of the DD Form 214.  There is no provision to enter any duty assignment other than the unit of assignment upon separation on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Since there is no provision to show duty assignments on the DD Form 214 other than the last duty assignment and major command, there is no basis for granting his request to show his service in Honduras and Germany on his DD Form 214.  

2.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence which shows he completed SRT training.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to add this training to his DD Form 214.

3.  Although he contends he was a member of the M-60 machine gun team, there is no evidence to support this contention.  There are no orders which show he received a marksmanship qualification badge with the machinegun bar.   

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x__  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015570





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015570



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030073

    Original file (20100030073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his separation document to show award of the Army Achievement Medal and campaign participation for El Salvador. There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 8 November 1983...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010998

    Original file (20060010998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show award of the Honduras Parachutist Badge and his overseas service. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant served in Honduras during the period from 25 February to 7 May 1986 (2 months and 13 days), and that he was awarded the Honduras Parachutist Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013536

    Original file (20110013536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his overseas service, specifically the overseas service bar and Overseas Service Ribbon. b. letter, dated 19 March 1985, issued by the Ambassador, Embassy of the United States, El Salvador, wherein he recognized the performance of selected personnel of the 1st Aviation Battalion, including the applicant, for their aviation support to the U.S. Embassy from 3 November 1984 to 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009304

    Original file (20080009304.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60) and correction of his records to show his meritorious service award. Early in 1967 a group of supply assistance personnel from the U.S. Army Materiel Command went to Vietnam on temporary duty, under the code name Project COUNTER. With respect to the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60), there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000206C070206

    Original file (20050000206C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's personnel records which show he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by amending his DD Form 214 to show award of the Master Parachutist Badge; and b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000199C070205

    Original file (20060000199C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his discharge document to show award of the Purple Heart, Bronze Star Medal, Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, Expert Infantryman Badge, and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar. The NPRC verified the applicant's entitlement to the Bronze Star Medal; however, the applicant's service records were not corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013957

    Original file (20080013957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Army Service Ribbon, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60), and several other State ribbons/awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show the applicant is entitled to the Army Service Ribbon. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001893

    Original file (20090001893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in his service personnel records that show he was awarded the BSM, ARCOM (2nd Award), AAM (2nd Award), AGCM, or the Honduran Military Airborne Badge. Neither the applicant's DD Form 214 nor his DA Form 2-1 show the second award of the ARCOM or the AAM and the applicant's records do not contain any orders for these awards. In the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient basis to correct his DD Form 214 to show his service in Honduras or to award him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004775

    Original file (20130004775.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, in two applications, request correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 March 1991 to show the: * Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (NPDR) * Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM) with "M" Device * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia) * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rocket Launcher...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010365

    Original file (20080010365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his discharge document to show his correct date of birth (DOB) and his awards and decorations. In addition, the evidence of record shows, with the exception of the applicant’s DD Form 214, the applicant's military personnel records consistently show his DOB as 26 August 19##. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 5 of his DD Form 214 the...