IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 2 February 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015492
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests the records of her former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she timely deemed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election within 1 year of their divorce.
2. The applicant states:
* the court ordered her former husband to continue to pay for the SBP after their divorce in April 2009
* she received a letter in May 2009 informing her of the action she needed to take to ensure the deemed election
* she thought the one-year rule applied from the date on the letter she received
* after settling her affairs, she contacted the Army Review Boards Agency and she received a letter concerning the deemed election in January 2011
* after a mix up in her award of the retired pay, she sent another letter in March 2011 requesting the deemed election but she received no response
* she was ultimately advised of the 1-year rule and now after securing employment she is faced with the additional pressure of trying to build a retirement plan
3. The applicant provides:
* Letters from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), dated 10 May 2010 and 6 July 2011
* Letters written to DFAS, dated 10 January and 28 March 2011
* Divorce decree
* DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), dated 25 July 2011
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Having had prior active service, the FSM was appointed as a commissioned officer, executed an oath of office, and entered active duty on 19 November 1970.
2. The FSM and Doxxxn, the applicant, were married on 27 December 1983.
3. The FSM served in a variety of stateside and/or overseas assignments and he attained the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC).
4. In anticipation of his upcoming retirement, the FSM completed a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) wherein he indicated he was married and had dependent children. He elected spouse and dependent children SBP coverage based on the full amount.
5. On 31 January 1998, the FSM was honorably retired and placed on the retired list in his retired rank of LTC on 1 February 1998. He was credited with completing over 28 years of faithful honorable active service.
6. On 4 January 2010, the FSM and applicant entered into a property settlement agreement with respect to the maintenance and support, property division, and other matters concerning their marriage. Their divorce decree, dated 23 April 2009, which incorporated their settlement agreement, stipulated that:
* The FSM would pay the applicant a monthly sum of $2,200.00 commencing on 1 December 2009
* The applicant was awarded 25% of the FSM's disposable retired pay to be paid directly by DFAS
* The FSM would maintain the applicant's survivor benefits under the SBP
* The FSM would pay 100% of the cost of the SBP and the applicant would pay 0% of the cost
7. There is no indication that the applicant notified DFAS within 1 year of their divorce to change the FSM's SBP election to former spouse coverage.
8. On 24 May 2010, by letter, DFAS officials notified the applicant that her application for payment of a portion of the FSM's retired pay had been received and that it would be placed in suspense for 30 days to allow the FSM to provide information regarding the status of the court order. The letter also advised the applicant that if her divorce decree specified that she be designated as a former spouse beneficiary for the SBP, she must make a deemed election for SBP coverage within 1 year of the date of her divorce.
9. On 10 January 2011, by letter to DFAS, the applicant requested a deemed election of the FSM's SBP coverage.
10. On 28 March 2011, by letter to DFAS, the applicant again requested a deemed election of the FSM's SBP coverage.
11. On 6 July 2011, by letter, DFAS officials notified the applicant that there is no provision in the law to make former spouse coverage an automatic benefit. The only means is for the service member to change the election. In some instances, the former spouse can deem the election within 1 year of the divorce. Since her letters were past the one-year period, they were deemed invalid.
12. On 19 July 2011, in response to the FSM's request, an Army Review Boards Agency official informed him that he had not exhausted his administrative remedies and that his request to change his SBP election should be addressed to DFAS.
13. On 25 July 2011, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-1 requesting his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse based on his divorce. He submitted the original election form to this Board.
14. In a phone conversation between the case analyst of record and the applicant, on 3 January 2012, the applicant indicated her former husband has not remarried.
15. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.
16. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established SBP for former military spouses of retired members.
17. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce. The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows at the time of retirement in January 1998, the FSM elected to participate in the SBP for spouse coverage. Years later, in April 2009, he and his spouse were divorced. Their divorce decree stipulated the FSM was required to maintain the applicant's survivor benefits under the SBP and the FSM would pay 100% of the cost of the SBP.
2. The SBP election was not changed from "spouse" coverage to "former spouse" coverage and the applicant did not make a deemed election within
1 year of the divorce.
3. However, at some stage, the applicant applied for a portion of the FSM's retired pay and DFAS officials advised her that if her divorce decree specified that she be designated as a former spouse beneficiary for the SBP, she must make a deemed election for SBP coverage within 1 year of the date of her divorce. She immediately corresponded with DFAS and requested a deemed election. Had she received an earlier response from DFAS, her deemed election request would have most likely been made within the required on-year period.
4. In view of the foregoing evidence, and given that the FSM did not remarry, there is sufficient proof to indicate the applicant submitted the necessary paperwork to establish a deemed former spouse SBP election within the prescribed time frame after her divorce. Therefore, in the interest of justice, it would be equitable to correct the records to show the applicant made a request for a deemed election for former spouse beneficiary in a timely manner.
BOARD VOTE:
___x____ ____x___ ____x___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant made a request for a deemed election for former spouse beneficiary within 1 year of the divorce, 23 April 2009, and that DFAS received and effected the change.
_______ _ __x_____ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110015492
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110015492
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003158
The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. Her former spouse's SBP election was then changed from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage. On 16 December 2014, by letter, DFAS informed the applicant that after a review of the FSM's pay records, it was determined that the wording in the divorce decree was insufficient to establish that the court...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011259
Counsel states: * since the Board's decision, his client has discovered evidence which supports her assertion that she submitted the proper documentation well before the deadline for submission of a deemed election * a pay statement shows the applicant's SBP benefits were terminated in October 1989, which coincides with the U.S. Army Finance and Accounting Center (USAFAC) correspondence acknowledging receipt of her court order and supporting documents * the Second Decree contained no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007450
The divorce decree indicated that the FSM elected to provide the applicant with survivor benefits under the SBP, and the FSM shall not change his election. A memorandum, dated 10 December 2009, to the FSM from DFAS shows that DFAS changed the FSM's SBP coverage from spouse to no beneficiary after learning neither the FSM nor the applicant made a deemed election to change SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse within one year of the 24 September 2003 divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, section...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019539
On 26 September 2013, by letter, DFAS responded to the applicant that a review of the FSM's retired pay account reflected the FSM did not elect former spouse SBP coverage and although the divorce decree stated she must deem the election, there is no evidence she did so. On 27 January 2014, by letter, DFAS explained that in order for the former spouse to be eligible for the SBP annuity, the member would have to request in writing to change the SBP election from spouse to former spouse or the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023390
The applicant provides: * Orders 343-072 (Retired Reserve) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23B (Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History Statement) * Letters from her divorce attorney * Superior Court of the State of New York, County of Orange, Court Order Acceptance for Processing and Amended Court Order Acceptable for Processing * Correspondence with and from DFAS * DD Form 2656-10 (SBP/RCSBP Request for Deemed Election) * Copies of certified mail receipts * Letter from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016500
The FSM did not make a former spouse election within 1 year of their divorce. DFAS advised the applicant on 21 September 2012 that they could not reestablish former spouse SBP coverage on the basis of a deemed election request until they received a modified court order because SBP cannot be split between two beneficiaries. If the applicant receives a modified court order for 100% of the FSM's SBP, she can deem an election directly to DFAS.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009158
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. There is no evidence the FSM attempted to change his elected SBP from spouse to former spouse prior to his death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017562
The applicant states: * she and the FSM gave the best years of their lives to the Army * the only reason she divorced the FSM is because of what Operation Desert Storm did to him; he came back a different man * their divorce decree clearly stipulated that she was to be the beneficiary under the SBP at the FSM's expense * the FSM paid SBP premiums from his retired pay each and every month * in spite of their divorce, she and the FSM spoke at least once a week * when the FSM knew he was dying...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011733
The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. However, the FSM's pay records do not reflect receipt of the former spouse election from the FSM nor did DFAS receive a deemed election request from the applicant within one year of the divorce. When the FSM...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001313
The applicant states that she was married to the FSM for 25 years, 18 of which were during his military service and that upon his retirement, he elected spouse coverage under the SBP. The applicant contends that the records of her former spouse should be corrected to show that her request for a deemed election of former spouse coverage under the SBP was timely received and properly processed by officials at DFAS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...