Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015391
Original file (20110015391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  26 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015391 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), "Army Meritorious Unit Citation" (properly called the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC)), and "Army Presidential Unit Citation."

2.  He states he is a Vietnam veteran who was assigned to the 5th and 23d Infantry Divisions.  He states, in effect, he served in combat from 1971 to 1972, but was not issued the CIB.  He states this was an oversight by his unit in Vietnam.

3.  He provides:

* his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* orders discharging him from the U.S. Army Reserve
* two pages of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* correspondence from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, MO, pertaining to his decorations 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 November 1969.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (Light-Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).  His record shows he served in MOS 63B throughout his Army service.

3.  His DA Form 20 shows in:

* item 31 (Foreign Service) he was credited with service in Vietnam from 9 June 1971 to 20 March 1972
* item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with:

* Company C, 75th Support Battalion, 1st Brigade, 5th Infantry Division (Mechanized), from 25 June to 25 August 1971
* Headquarters and Company A, 23d Medical Battalion, from 26 August to 12 November 1971
* Class I Company, U.S. Army Depot, Qui Nhon, from 13 November 1971 to 19 March 1972

* item 38 he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings

4.  His record is void of documentation showing he served as an infantryman or held an infantry MOS.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 24 March 1972 under a phase-down release program.  He completed 2 years, 4 months, and 12 days of total active service.

6.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was authorized the following:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Commendation Medal
* Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* one Overseas Service Bar
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  

	a.  The pamphlet does not show that any of the units the applicant served with in Vietnam were cited for award of the PUC or an "Army Presidential Unit Citation."  

	b.  The pamphlet does show Headquarters and Company A, 23d Medical Battalion, was cited for award of the MUC for the period 1 January 1968 to 31 August 1969, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 53, dated 1970.  

9.  Review of the applicant's record indicates he is entitled to additional awards not shown on his DD Form 214.

10.  Special Orders Number 15, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Campbell, Fort Campbell, KY, dated 16 January 1970, awarded him the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.  Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

12.  His record is void of documentation showing he was convicted by court-martial or that he received a commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon, to include the VSM, for each credited campaign.  The Vietnam campaigns are listed in appendix B.  His record shows his service in Vietnam coincided with three campaigns:  

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970 - 30 June 1971)
* Consolidation I (1 July - 30 November 1971)
* Consolidation II (1 December 1971 - 29 March 1972)

13.  DAGO 8, dated 1974, announced award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command, and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV), and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant did not serve in an infantry MOS during his service in Vietnam.  Further, he was assigned to duty in Vietnam with a support battalion, a medical battalion, and a depot, none of which are infantry units.  Therefore, he is not eligible for award of the CIB.

2.  He did not serve in a unit that was cited for award of the PUC or "Army Presidential Unit Citation."  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show the PUC or "Army Presidential Unit Citation."

3.  He received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service, and there is no record of a commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM.  In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 13 November 1969 to 24 March 1972 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

4.  He was awarded the VSM and he participated in three campaigns while serving in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show three bronze service stars for wear on the previously-awarded VSM.

5.  He was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this badge.

6.  He served in a unit during a period for which it was cited for award of the MUC, and he served in units subordinate Headquarters, USARV, during a period for which the command and its subordinate units were cited for award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 13 November 1969 to 24 March 1972; 

	b.  deleting the VSM from item 24 of his DD Form 214; and

	c.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the:

* AGCM
* VSM with three bronze service stars
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* MUC
* RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the CIB, PUC, and "Army Presidential Unit Citation." 



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015391





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015391



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008736

    Original file (20110008736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service) he was credited with service in Vietnam from 16 August 1967 to 15 August 1968 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with the 527th MP Company from 19 August 1967 to 6 August 1968 * item 38 he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings 4. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011440

    Original file (20130011440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal evidence of a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the AGCM (1st Award). The evidence of record shows the applicant performed duty in MOS 12B and he was assigned to the 26th Engineer Battalion while serving in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003391

    Original file (20150003391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he served a tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) beginning on 2 December 1967 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to – * Company C, 3rd Battalion (Airborne), 187th Infantry from 4 December 1967 to 19 December 1967 * Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry, from 20 December 1967 to 26 December 1968 * item 41 (Awards and Decorations) – * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023195

    Original file (20110023195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his record and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). It states a bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a member of the U.S. Army outside of the continental limits of the United States for the specific time frames and areas of operation cited in Army Regulation 670-1 or appropriate Department of the Army message. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020200

    Original file (20100020200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his record be corrected by adding a third award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and all unit awards due based on his service and campaign participation in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * self-authored statement * ARCOM Certificate, dated 12 February 1971 * ARCOM Citation * ARCOM Orders, dated 24 February 1971 * enlisted disability retirement letter orders, dated 3 August 1971 * DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014411

    Original file (20110014411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows the applicant earned three marksmanship badges that were not listed in item 24 of his DD Form 214. However, his unit was never cited for award of the MUC at any time during its service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004157C070208

    Original file (20040004157C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Linda M. Barker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009527

    Original file (20120009527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * Glider Badge * Parachutist Badge * Lapel Button 2. There is no DD Form 214 in the applicant's available service records covering active duty service in the ROK. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 June 1972 to add: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091562C070212

    Original file (2003091562C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, his record does show that he earned the PH, for being wounded in action while serving in the RVN and that he received the Parachutist Badge based on his completion of the Airborne Course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015806

    Original file (20090015806.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2 January 1964 through 23 December 1965 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. The evidence of record also confirms that based on his honorable active duty service the applicant is eligible for the NDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....