Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015383
Original file (20110015383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015383 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was wounded in action in Vietnam on two occasions and two awards of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was assigned to the 199th Infantry Brigade, the 1st Infantry Division, and the 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) while serving in Vietnam.  In September 1970, he was hit in his ear by shrapnel.  In November 1970, he was wounded in his ankle and legs by shrapnel.

	a.  He states that he was told he was put in for the Purple Heart for his wounds and that orders would be issued; however, he never received them.

	b.  He adds that small pieces of steel came out of his legs for years afterwards and members of his family have witnessed this.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a "buddy statement."

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 July 1969.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 31 (Foreign Service):  Vietnam from 5 January 1970 through
28 November 1970;

	b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments):

* Replacement Detachment, Company A, 7th Support Battalion,
199th Infantry Brigade, from 8 through 18 January 1970
* Company B, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry, 199th Infantry Brigade, from 19 January through 31 August 1970
* Company D, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry, 199th Infantry Brigade, from
1 September through 1 October 1970
* Company D, 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), from 2 October through 27 November 1970

	c.  item 40 (Wounds) no entry (blank); and

	d.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no listing of the Purple Heart.

4.  A Standard Form 88 (Report of Medal Examination), dated 6 May 1971, was completed at the time of the applicant's separation examination.  It shows in:

	a.  the Clinical Evaluation section, item 22 (Ears - General) and item 37  (Lower Extremities) a checkmark in the "Normal" column; and 

	b.  item 73 (Notes and Significant or Interval History):  "In good condition except have small problem in ankle to right foot" and the applicant's initials.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 27 July 1971 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his Reserve obligation.

	a.  He completed 2 years of active service.

	b.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show the Purple Heart.

6.  A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart.

7.  The Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name.

8.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam-era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

9.  In support of his application, the applicant provides a statement from Mr. John R----, dated 10 April 2011.  Mr. R---- states he was a convoy commander and served with the applicant in Vietnam in 1970.

	a.  On one occasion, the applicant was in the hospital after getting sprayed with Agent Orange near Fire Base Mace.  Mr. R---- drove the applicant from the hospital back to his unit.

	b.  On another occasion, Mr. R---- picked up the applicant from his unit.  The applicant had blood and mud on his uniform around the area of his knee and ankle.  He asked the applicant "How come you are so muddy?"  The applicant responded, "If you were out here 45 days you would be bloody and moody to [sic]."

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations.  The Purple Heart is awarded to any member who was wounded or killed in action.
A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.  In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made required treatment by medical personnel and the medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action must have been made a matter of official record.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's claims to the Purple Heart were carefully considered.

	a.  The applicant's statement is non-specific as to the dates of his injuries.

	b.  The "buddy statement" the applicant provides is silent on the dates and also the cause of the applicant's knee and ankle injury.  Thus, the statement offers insufficient evidence to show that the applicant's injuries were the result of enemy action.

	c.  At the time of his separation medical examination, the applicant's lower extremities were normal.

	d.  Thus, available medical records fail to corroborate his claims.

2.  There are no military records that show the applicant was wounded or injured in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.

   a.  There is no record of medical treatment to satisfy the strict requirement for award of the Purple Heart.

   b.  In addition, the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing and there is no evidence the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.

3.  The sincerity of the applicant's claims are not in question.  However, in order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made was sustained in action or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.  The available evidence fails to satisfy this requirement.

4.  In view of all of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support the applicant's claims to the Purple Heart.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015383



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015383



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000153

    Original file (20120000153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Nothing in the following typical sources confirm he was wounded in action and/or treated for a combat injury/wound: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect a combat wound or injury * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart * His records do not contain general orders awarding him the Purple Heart * His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty listing * His medical records are not available for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017943

    Original file (20140017943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the applicant has submitted a request to the Army Decorations Board, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) and was denied relief. d. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214, and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the following awards: * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002581

    Original file (20140002581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he is in total disagreement with the Board's decision and is requesting reconsideration of the Board's decision * he is not seeking to be glorified by this award; he is seeking the citation for which it was meant * he feels that he submitted the required evidence to validate his application in the previous record of proceedings (ROP) * he regrets that his sergeant in charge felt it unnecessary to document his injuries or have them checked by medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014749

    Original file (20140014749.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Presidential Unit Citation. He was wounded in Vietnam, but he did not receive a Purple Heart. His service record does not contain orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or medical documents that show he was wounded in action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011545

    Original file (20110011545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence in his available military personnel records nor sufficient corroborating evidence provided by him which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. In the absence of evidence showing the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for such wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005636

    Original file (20110005636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge, and Valorous Unit Award. It also shows the division was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for actions in late 1965. c. VA BIRLS record that shows the applicant completed 7 years and 17 days of total active service. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029976

    Original file (20100029976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was wounded during combat with the enemy in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Given he received medical treatment from November to December 1969 for a fragment wound, as evidenced by the medical treatment record he provided, it must be presumed that military medical officials and the responsible members of his chain of command did not believe the injury in question was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017057

    Original file (20090017057.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster [indicating award of two Purple Hearts]. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was wounded a second time during a different incident. In the absence of evidence of record that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action during another incident, and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017483

    Original file (20140017483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Item 40 (Wounds) shows he was wounded in action as a result of hostile enemy action on 28 January 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073615C070403

    Original file (2002073615C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. The Board also noted that the applicant’s discharge document does not show any unit awards. Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart, especially in view of the evidence of record which shows that the applicant was not wounded or injured as a result of hostile action.