Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015352
Original file (20110015352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  26 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015352 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity based on the death of her husband, a former service member (FSM).

2.  The applicant states:

* the requirement to be married for at least 1 year to be eligible for the SBP benefits is an injustice to her and her late husband
* her late husband paid into the plan with an intention of leaving the annuity to the applicant
* she and the FSM had been friends for approximately 36 years prior to their marriage in April 2010
* he was the love of her life and when they married, their marriage was going to be forever; however, he passed away in November 2010
* his annuity had been paid in full which technically means he met the 
1-year requirement
* officials at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informed her she was ineligible for the annuity because she had not been married to the FSM for at least 1 year and 1 day
* neither she nor her late husband were aware of the 1-year requirement
* the Board should waive the 1-year requirement based on the fact that her late husband had paid up the SBP in full and his death was unexpected
* she lives on a limited income and the annuity would essentially improve her standard of living


3.  The applicant provides:

* FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* FSM's Retiree Account Statement, January 2010
* FSM's marriage license
* FSM's death certificate
* Air Force IMT Form 58 (Casualty Assistance Summary)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was born on 3 May 1918.

2.  Having prior service, he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army and entered active duty on 18 June 1943.  He served in a variety of stateside and overseas assignments and he attained the rank of major (MAJ).

3.  His records show he was previously married to J____ and they had two sons. 

4.  He retired on 31 December 1958 and he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of MAJ on 1 January 1959.

5.  DFAS records show he elected spouse SBP coverage based on the full amount and his coverage was effective 1 January 1974.  His SBP premiums were paid up on 1 October 2008 (based on the law).  DFAS records also show he had no beneficiary as of 9 October 2009 which suggests his first spouse died on that date.

6.  The FSM's January 2010 Retiree Account Statement shows he had spouse SBP coverage, but there was no charge for his coverage because he was paid up.

7.  He and the applicant were married on 12 April 2010.  

8.  On 7 November 2010, the FSM died.  His death certificate shows he was married to the applicant at the time of his death.

9.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election once made was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  The law required a 2-year waiting period for a new spouse's eligibility following post-retirement marriage.
10.  Public Law 94-496, enacted 14 October 1976 but effective 1 October 1976, reduced the waiting period for a new spouse's eligibility from 2 years to 1 year following post-retirement marriage.

11.  Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established paid-up coverage under the SBP.  Effective 1 October 2008, no reduction may be made in the retired pay of a participant in the SBP for any month after the later of:  (1) the 360th month for which the participant's retired pay is reduced or (2) the month during which the participant attains age 70.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The FSM elected SBP spouse coverage effective 1 January 1974.  He served faithfully and made payment of his SBP premiums until he was paid up effective 1 October 2008.

2.  He and the applicant were married on 23 April 2010.  In order for the applicant to be an eligible SBP annuity recipient, the law requires that she and the FSM to have been married for at least 1 year.  Regretfully, he passed away in November 2010 prior to the 1-year anniversary required by law for the applicant to be an eligible beneficiary.  The years he was married to his former spouse are not transferable to the applicant.  Therefore, she is ineligible for payment of the FSM's SBP annuity.

3.  The FSM's faithful service and the applicant's devotion to the FSM are not in question.  However, his participation in the SBP was subject to the program's statutory requirements.  This Board lacks the authority to change or waive the statutory definitions of eligible beneficiaries.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015352



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015352



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022811

    Original file (20100022811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) provided by DFAS shows the following: * retirement date – 1 October 2004 * spouse – F____ * child – S____ with a date of birth of 23 July 1991 * SBP election – 26b, coverage for spouse and child(ren) * date signed – 7 July 2004 4. DFAS stated in an email to this Board, dated 9 May 2011, the FSM's DD Form 2656 was submitted by Fort Carson on 3 November 2004 and shows he elected spouse and child(ren) coverage. The applicant and the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010010

    Original file (20100010010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM was born on 23 February 1968 and he enlisted in the Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) on 11 August 1986. Therefore, even if he had been married to the applicant for a year, she would still not be eligible to receive an SBP annuity because the FSM named his children as the beneficiaries of his SBP annuity and never added the applicant. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011598

    Original file (20120011598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002143

    Original file (20090002143.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant married the FSM in "1995," but he did not inform DFAS within a year of the marriage, so the applicant was not eligible. DFAS issued the applicant two payments which were later collected because she was not entitled to an SBP annuity because the FSM was not married at the time of his retirement and had not elected coverage for her within one year of their marriage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the FSM be corrected by showing that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000030

    Original file (20120000030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He elected participation in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage based on the full amount under Option C (Immediate coverage). On 15 August 2011, by letter, a DFAS official notified the applicant's Member of Congress that: * Entitlement to retired pay terminates on the date of the retiree's death * The Arrears of Pay (AOP) include unencumbered amounts due to the deceased member * An amount of $752.40 was mailed to the applicant on 1 September 2010 for his AOP from 1 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019966

    Original file (20100019966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that while she concurs with the current law that requires a spouse to be married for 1 year prior to being entitled to SBP benefits, her case is unique in that the FSM (a retired major general) was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease 2 years before his death. When DFAS was notified of the FSM's death, the death of his former spouse, and his marriage to the applicant, the applicant was advised that she was not entitled to SBP benefits and all premiums paid by the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001656

    Original file (20110001656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for her at the time of his retirement. The applicant further provided a copy of a letter, dated 30 November 2010, from HRC, Retired Pay Branch, wherein she was advised that a review of her late husband's Reserve Component Survivor Benefit File found that he did not complete a DD Form 1883; therefore, she was ineligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002359

    Original file (20080002359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that she be paid the Survivor Benefit Program (SBP) annuity as the former spouse of her ex-husband, a former service member (FSM). There is no record of the FSM being divorced from the applicant and there is no change of option from spouse to former spouse indicated in his records. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017562

    Original file (20110017562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * she and the FSM gave the best years of their lives to the Army * the only reason she divorced the FSM is because of what Operation Desert Storm did to him; he came back a different man * their divorce decree clearly stipulated that she was to be the beneficiary under the SBP at the FSM's expense * the FSM paid SBP premiums from his retired pay each and every month * in spite of their divorce, she and the FSM spoke at least once a week * when the FSM knew he was dying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014510

    Original file (20110014510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. There is no documentation in the FSM's available records that shows he elected to participate in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) after receiving his 20-year letter in 1997.