Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015265
Original file (20110015265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  2 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015265 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the reentry eligibility (RE) code shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from 
RE-3 to RE-1.

2.  The applicant states the record is in error because he received an honorable discharge.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 February 1999 for a period of 3 years.  He held military occupational specialty 63J (Quartermaster and Chemical Equipment Repairer).  The highest grade he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/E-3.

3.  His records show his last duty station was at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, where he served from 30 September 1999 until 3 February 2002.

4.  On 5 August 2001, he was stopped by a military police officer (MP).  The MP noted he had an odor of intoxicating liquor emanating from his person.  After failing a field sobriety test, a breathalyzer test was administered.  The results of the test showed his breath alcohol concentration as .095 percent.

5.  On 10 September 2001, the Commanding General (CG) of Schofield Barracks issued him a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR) for driving while under the influence of alcohol.  The reprimand was issued as an administrative measure and not as punishment under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.  The CG directed the GOMOR and allied document to be filed in his official military personnel file.

6.  His enlisted record brief shows he was reduced in grade from E-3 to E-2 on 9 November 2001.

7.  On 3 February 2002, the applicant was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of private/E-2 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) for the duration of his statutory service obligation.  He was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of MBK and an RE-3.  The narrative reason for separation shown on his DD Form 214 is "completion of required active service."

8.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Chapter 3 prescribes the basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment and includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes.  An RE-3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It notes that SPD code MBK is the appropriate code when the reason for discharge is "completion of required active service."  Additionally, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table establishes RE codes to be assigned for each SPD.  This table states that when the SPD is MBK, the RE code will be either RE-1 or RE-3.  The table states that RE-3 will be used when the Soldier's record indicates for the current enlistment period that Soldier is ineligible for or otherwise denied immediate reenlistment without a waiver.

10.  Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program) states a Soldier may not exceed the retention control point which is 3 years for Soldiers in the grades of E-1 through E-3.  Exceptions for reenlistment or extension exist; however; Soldiers who are reduced in rank are not authorized the exceptions for reenlistment or extension.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the applicant was in his initial 3-year enlistment and was serving in pay grade E-2.  He was not eligible to reenlist because he had reached his retention control point and had been previously reduced in rank.  As such, he was appropriately assigned an RE code 3.

2.  It should be noted that an RE code 3 does not necessarily reflect that an individual was discharged as a result of misconduct or based on a medical reason.  Rather, as in the applicant's case, it is merely an indication that he was not fully eligible for immediate reenlistment at the time of his separation from active duty.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015265



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015265



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009029

    Original file (AR20130009029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his request for discharge, the applicant acknowledged that by submitting the request for discharge he was admitting he was guilty of the charge against him or of a lesser-included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge. The record shows the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age and he had served seven years and achieved the grade of E-5. The Army Discharge Review Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001581

    Original file (AR20130001581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was separated on 13 July 2007, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge, an SPD code of JPD and a RE code of 4. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018935

    Original file (20100018935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) states the Separation Program Designator (SPD) codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for, and types of, separation from active duty. The SPD code of "MBK" is the correct code for Soldiers REFRAD for completion of required active service under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 and transferred to the Reserve component (RC) to complete their military service obligation. He was...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005955

    Original file (AR20130005955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with an honorable characterization of service. The applicant was separated on 2 October 2009, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge, an SPD code of JPD and a RE code of 4. The applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity and no additional corroborating and supporting documentation or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011234

    Original file (20130011234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of Item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "1" instead of "3." Only when there is evidence to support an incorrect RE code or when there is an administrative error will an applicant be advised to request a correction; b. an RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. They are fully qualified for enlistment if all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020942

    Original file (20110020942.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SPD code of "MBK" is the correct code for Soldiers REFRAD for completion of required active service under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200. This code is used for RA Soldiers eligible to reenlist or with a DCSS who are REFRAD on completion of enlistment and transferred to the Reserve components to complete military service obligation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130015545

    Original file (AR20130015545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable, a change to his reentry eligibility (RE) code and to his narrative reason for discharge. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: The applicant's available record does not contain any recorded actions under the UCMJ or counseling statements. Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003764

    Original file (AR20130003764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Furthermore, Soldiers...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000683

    Original file (AR20130000683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: After serving in the Army National Guard and the Regular Army, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army on 2 October 2010, for a period of 5 years. The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By regulation, a UOTHC discharge is normally appropriate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016086

    Original file (20090016086.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) Code be changed on his 2005 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicant states that he believes his RE Code of “3” is wrong because he was separated with an honorable characterization of service at the completion of his required period of active service. Evidence available to the Board indicates the applicant was on his initial 3 year enlistment and was serving in pay grade E-3.