Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014770
Original file (20110014770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	 15 March 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014770 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment of the remainder of his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in the amount of $10,000.00.

2.  The applicant states he contracted for the CSRB while deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and he was subsequently denied his anniversary payment of $10,000.00 because he never became qualified in the area of concentration (AOC) of 11A (Infantry Officer).  He goes on to state he deployed to Iraq in 2007 as a commander in AOC 19C (Cavalry).  He further states he served as the commander of Headquarters and Headquarters Troop,
1st Battalion, 158th Cavalry Regiment of the Maryland Army National Guard (MDARNG).  He also states the unit deployed as an infantry company in lieu of a cavalry unit and upon release from active duty (REFRAD) the company was reverted back to a cavalry unit.  He continues by stating that before, during, and after post-deployment his position was that of a 19-series officer and in his reading of his CSRB it was determined he was qualified for the retention bonus because 19C is similar to 19B (Armor).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the CSRB addendum and the denial of his request for an exception to policy by the National Guard Bureau (NGB).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving as a staff sergeant in the MDARNG when he was appointed as a second lieutenant in the MDARNG on 17 June 2001.  He was 


promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 18 December 2003 and on
26 February 2005 he was awarded primary AOC 19C and secondary AOC 19A (Armor, General).

2.  He was ordered to active duty in support of OIF on 9 June 2007 and he was promoted to the rank of captain (CPT) on 9 June 2007.  He deployed to Iraq on
9 September 2007 and on 14 February 2008 he signed a CSRB agreement for payment of $20,000.00 for a period of 3 years.

3.  He departed Iraq on 2 March 2008 and he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 16 March 2008.  He was paid $10,000.00 of the CSRB on 24 April 2008.

4.  On 18 April 2011, the NGB denied the applicant’s request for an exception to policy to retain the CSRB.  The basis for the NGB’s denial was that the applicant was deployed in an 11A position and he never became qualified in that skill and he was never Federally Recognized in AOC 11A.  The NGB also indicated the applicant was not qualified for any AOC’s listed in the CSRB AOC List.  Accordingly, he was not entitled to retention of the CSRB incentive.

5.  A review of the applicant’s official records failed to reveal a copy of the applicant’s CSRB contract or any documents associated with the bonus agreement.

6.  Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1304.29 dated 15 December 2004 prescribes the administration of the CSRB.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the CSRB for captains in a critical AOC is up to $20,000.00 for a 3-year commitment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he is entitled to payment of the remainder of his CSRB in the amount of $10,000.00 has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  The available evidence suggests the applicant committed to a CSRB in an AOC for which he was not qualified.  Additionally, he was not qualified in any other AOC that was listed on the critical AOC list at the time.  However, for reasons that are not present in the available records, he was allowed to enter into a contract for which he was not eligible.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show otherwise, it does not appear that he is eligible to receive a CSRB payment.


4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X__  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014770



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014770



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021496

    Original file (20140021496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) for payment of the remaining $10,000.00 of his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) and relief from recoupment of the portion already paid. The applicant states: * he was in an eligible position and eligible for the CSRB in 2008 and the necessary documents were sent to his headquarters and he was paid the first half of the bonus * he inquired about the unpaid portion of the bonus years later and he was informed that a records review was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006765

    Original file (20120006765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. Paragraph 6i states that officers who meet the qualification and who execute a 3-year CSRB contract and service agreement will be paid $20,000.00. c. The applicant signed a CSRB agreement with the Ohio ARNG on 2 November 2008 in critical AOC 19A. The issue is confusing because NGB says his agreement shows his bonus AOC as 19A and his command says his bonus AOC was 19B, but the CSRB contract does not list any AOC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017840

    Original file (20130017840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in area of concentration (AOC) 11A (Infantry) [or AOC 53A (Automation Officer)]. The applicant indicated that he was eligible for a CSRB and that he would complete 6 years of commissioned service on 8 March 2009; the applicant was advised that he did not have to wait until 8 March 2009 to complete the agreement; he was provided instructions to place his initials in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021245

    Original file (20120021245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The exception to policy memorandum stated he: * had been issued a control number via Information Management and Reporting Center (iMARC) * executed a CSRB addendum for AOC 19A on 10 April 2008 * received the first installment of $10,000 on 15 May 2008 * the second installment was rejected because his AOC was not listed as a critical AOC on the NGB's approved list of AOCs that qualified for the bonus 21. The applicant's primary skill, 19A, was not a designated skill for the bonus and there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016518

    Original file (20130016518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a critical skills retention bonus (CSRB). The disapproval was based on: * the applicant not serving in the AOC for which contracted, as he moved into an AOC 19C position within 4 months of signing the CSRB agreement * CSRB agreement containing different signature dates from the applicant and the service representative * contract/bonus addendum not showing the critical AOC in the space provided (memorandum from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013345

    Original file (20130013345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After he received the first $10,000.00, he assumed all of the documentation for the CSRB anniversary payment was on file at both the unit and the State Incentive Office. The applicant signed a CSRB agreement with the UTARNG on 25 February 2008 in critical AOC 15B. Although an exception to policy was requested, the request for payment of the second installment of the CSRB in the amount of $10,000.00 was subsequently denied by NGB because the working copy of the CSRB agreement was filed in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007314

    Original file (20120007314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official states in order to be eligible for the CSRB, ARNG officers must: a. be serving in the ARNG in the grade of captain (except for chaplains and Judge Advocates); b. have completed any current contractual obligation or bonus contract as a result of participation in either the Officer Accession or Affiliation Bonus; c. be fully qualified in one of the designated critical skills and extend in an Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTO&E) or "deployable" Table of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009709

    Original file (20140009709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he received an officer CSRB in 2008 while on Title 10 orders overseas * in late 2013 the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) was audited for administration of its bonus incentive program * he was notified that his bonus was to be recouped due to wording on his orders, lack of a bonus control number, and lack of dates on his contract * he was told to submit an exception to policy (ETP) to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) * NGB denied his request and provided a number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002867

    Original file (20120002867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He signed a 3-year CSRB in accordance with Unit and State Recruiting and Incentive personnel guidance on 20 November 2008. d. After he signed the contract he was paid the first installment of the CSRB in December 2008 with the final payment due upon completion of his contract on 20 November 2011. e. Upon successful completion of the CSRB contract terms, he was contacted by the State Incentive Officer, on 23 November 2011, and informed there was a discrepancy with the CRSB. On 12 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015768

    Original file (20120015768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum states: * On 20 November 2008 the applicant qualified for the CSRB in the amount of $20,000.00 * He met the criteria for the CSRB and was issued a bonus control number * His unit contacted that office to inquire about his second half of the incentive * Unfortunately that office could not assist him with his payment due to the working copy of his CSRB being placed into his records rather than the signed documents * The unit has recognized this error and has taken the necessary...