Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014690
Original file (20110014690.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014690 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded a second award of the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and an additional bronze service star for his Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).

2.  The applicant states that he served during qualifying period for award of a second award of the NDSM and he served in four campaigns in Vietnam so his DD Form 214 should reflect that he served in the Vietnam Summer-Fall Campaign, which is not listed on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), a copy of his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) and a list of Vietnam Campaigns.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 September 1967.  He completed his training as a clerk-typist and was transferred to Vietnam on 15 July 1968.  He served in four campaigns in Vietnam until 11 July 1969 when he was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California and was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 10 months and 11 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the NDSM, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Good Conduct Medal.
 
3.  On 29 September 1972 he was appointed as a United States Army Reserve Judge Advocate General Corps first lieutenant.  He was ordered to active duty on 14 October 1972 and remained on active duty until he was honorably REFRAD as a Regular Army lieutenant colonel on 31 December 1990 and was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 January 1991.  He had served 20 years and 25 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his retirement shows that he was awarded the NDSM with one bronze service star, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with four  bronze service stars, the Bronze Star Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (3 awards), the Army Good Conduct Medal, two overseas service bars, the Army Commendation Medal with one oak leaf cluster, the Army Service Ribbon with numeral “1”, the Overseas Service Ribbon with numeral one, the Meritorious Service Medal with three oak leaf clusters, his marksmanship badges, and his participation in the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V and VI and the TET Counteroffensive.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 already reflects two awards of the NDSM (NDSM-1), indicating the NDSM with one bronze service star.  Accordingly, no further mention of that award will be made in these proceedings.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 also shows that he was awarded the VSM with four bronze service stars; however, only three campaigns are listed on his DD Form 214.  Accordingly, the Vietnam Summer-Fall Campaign, which is not listed on his DD Form 214 should be added at this time.




BOARD VOTE:

__X___ _  __X_____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the entry “Vietnam Summer-Fall Campaign” to block 18 of his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _   X_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014690





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014690



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014411

    Original file (20110014411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows the applicant earned three marksmanship badges that were not listed in item 24 of his DD Form 214. However, his unit was never cited for award of the MUC at any time during its service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017003

    Original file (20140017003.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) (2nd Award). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from his DD Form 214 the VSM and adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * BSM (2nd Award) * VSM with four bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015065

    Original file (20080015065.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015065 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 7 May 1970, be corrected to add the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with 4 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003454

    Original file (20120003454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains a DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 July 1971. General orders awarded him the DFC (2nd Award) and he is entitled to addition of this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 29 March 1968 through 27 July 1969, b. deleting award of the DFC and VSM from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 July 1971,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004951

    Original file (20090004951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the PH and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 4 March 1970; by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001920

    Original file (20150001920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he earned the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) 8. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013132

    Original file (20080013132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show all awards to which he is entitled. The evidence of record includes official orders awarding the applicant the PH and the BSM and these awards were omitted from Item 24 of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20090001882

    Original file (AR20090001882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his ARCOM was mailed to him after he was separated from the Army and it is not included in the list of awards contained on his DD Form 214. Although an award would not normally be added to the DD Form 214 absent orders or a records entry confirming entitlement, the certificate and citation provided by the applicant seem to be valid and show the award was approved, on 25 June 1970, more than 60 days subsequent to the applicant's REFRAD. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012438

    Original file (20140012438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam he served with 101st Administration Company, 101st Airborne Division, from 21 November 1968 to 2 November 1969. c. Item 41 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) shows award of the following: * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * ARCOM * BSM * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Overseas Service Bars (2) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) 4. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013817

    Original file (20090013817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and all other awards he earned during his service. The evidence of record further confirms that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the applicant is also eligible for 4 bronze service stars to be worn with his already-awarded VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...