Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014651
Original file (20110014651.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014651 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states, in effect, that he should be awarded the CIB for his service in Vietnam during 1968 to 1969 with the 5th Special Forces Group (SFG).

3.  He provides his Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, dated
11 May 2011 and photographs. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 21 June 1967.  After completing basic and advanced individual training he was awarded Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 43E (Parachute Rigger).  He served in Vietnam from 8 October 1968 to 13 June 1969 and he was honorably released from active duty on 12 June 1969.

3.  During his tenure in Vietnam, he was assigned in duty MOS 43E to:

* 623d Quartermaster Company 
* 109th Quartermaster Company 
* Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 5th SFG (Airborne), 1st Special Forces 

4.  His VA rating decision shows he received a 100 percent disability rating for post traumatic stress disorder effective 30 September 2010.

5.  He also provides several pictures of himself in uniform with his weapon and on a tank.

6.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the CIB.  Additionally, his military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the CIB.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army enlisted Soldier must have an infantry or special forces specialty and must have satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger, or special forces unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat.  Eligibility for special forces personnel (less the special forces medical sergeant) accrues from 20 December 1989.  Retroactive awards for special forces personnel are not authorized.  A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or special forces primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant should be awarded the CIB.  An individual must have been personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or special forces primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.  Even though the applicant may have served with a special forces unit he was assigned and served as a parachute rigger in MOS 43E.  In view of these facts, there is an insufficient basis for award of the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014651



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014651



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021895

    Original file (20130021895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states: * his last military occupational specialty (MOS) was 11F4H (Infantry Operations and Intelligence Specialist) in Vietnam in 1970 * his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Badge) shows he completed the requirement for award of the Parachute Rigger Badge * these awards, to include the ARCOM for 20 years and 1 month of honorable service, were never added to his DD Form 214 3. His service record does not contain orders which show he was awarded the CIB, Parachute Rigger Badge or ARCOM....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010929

    Original file (20100010929.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 June 1959 for a period of 3 years and served continuously on active duty until he retired. Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era, infantry specialties for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge were identified as MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The applicant's records show he was assigned duties in MOS 76P and MOS 43E during his assignments in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010589

    Original file (20090010589.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Air Medal, Parachute Rigger Badge, and any unit awards he may be entitled to. Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Parachute Rigger Badge; and c. adding to item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015521

    Original file (20140015521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no special orders that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103616C070208

    Original file (2004103616C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 June 2000, the Board considered an application from the applicant requesting a correction to his DD Form 214 and award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Incorporated herein by reference are military records that were summarized in this previous consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR1999025704, on 13 June 2000. However, the evidence of record confirms he was assigned a DMOS of 43E at every active duty unit he served with.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007906

    Original file (20070007906.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Evidence of record shows that the applicant successfully completed the Parachute Rigger course conducted by the U.S. Army Quartermaster School and held an awarded MOS of 43E. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Parachute Rigger Badge and correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014805

    Original file (20130014805.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to add the Combat Infantryman Badge, Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait), Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia), Army Service Ribbon, Military Free Fall Parachutist Badge, Combat Action Badge, and the Soldier's Medal. The Kuwait Liberation Medal awarded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was approved on 3 January 1992 and is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004156

    Original file (20130004156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his dates of service in Vietnam and award of both Vietnam service medals (taken to mean the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960)). His DD Form 214 does not show his dates of service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015487

    Original file (20140015487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded and received treatment while on a temporary duty (TDY) assignment in Da Nang, Vietnam. His official military personnel file (OMPF) contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) covering the period 4 September 1963 to 13 August 1966 that shows in: * Item 38 (Record of Assignments) - shows he remained assigned to the 383rd Quartermaster Detachment until 13 August 1966. The applicant served in Da Nang, Vietnam and Quin Yon, Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010970

    Original file (20120010970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * Vietnam service * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * Presidential Unit Citation * marksmanship qualification badges * infantry, parachute rigger, and transportation specialist military occupational specialties (MOS's) * jungle warfare training, infantry advanced individual training (AIT), and leadership training 2. Therefore, it would be appropriate to amend the...