Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013856
Original file (20110013856.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  23 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013856 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that she be paid the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity designated to be paid to her by her deceased husband, a retired Virginia Army National Guard (VAARNG) staff sergeant.

2.  The applicant states that she reported her husband’s death within 30 days, she was issued a new identification card, and told that she had to wait until he reached age 60 before she could receive his retired pay benefits.  However, when he would have reached age 60, she was informed that she applied too late.  She followed the information that she was given and now she is being told she can no longer receive the benefits he earned.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a letter from the Human Resources Command (HRC) at Fort Knox, Kentucky, her marriage license, the FSM’s death certificate, the FSM’s 20-year letter, and her identification card.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM served on active duty in the Regular Army from 22 February 1977 to 17 November 1987.

2.  He enlisted in the VAARNG on 30 November 1987 and served through continuous reenlistments.  He was issued his 20-year letter on 1 October 1997 and on 7 November 1997 he completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) in which he elected full spouse coverage under option C (Immediate coverage).  The applicant was listed as his spouse.

3.  He was honorably discharged on 29 November 1997 and was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  

4.  On 11 January 2005, the FSM died at the age of 53 in Norfolk, Virginia.

5.  On 30 June 2011, officials at HRC dispatched a letter to the applicant informing her that the statute of limitations went into effect in her case on 
11 January 2011; therefore, her claim was denied because no valid annuity application was received within the 6-year statute of limitations and she could not be paid.  Officials also informed her that she could apply to this Board.

6.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; or (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  Once a member elects either options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.

7. Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702, also known as the barring statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues.  Among the important public policy considerations behind statutes of limitations, including the 6-year limitation for filing claims contained in this section of Title 31, U.S. Code, is relieving the government of the need to retain, access, and review old records for the purpose of settling stale claims, which are often difficult to prove or disprove.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the FSM enrolled in the RCSBP in 1997 for immediate full spouse coverage, with the applicant as the beneficiary.  The FSM died on 11 January 2005 and the applicant claims she was informed that she would have to wait until the FSM reached age 60 to receive benefits.  The applicant is not a military member and it is reasonable to believe that she was not aware of the requirement to submit a claim within a specified period.  It is also reasonable to believe that had she received proper assistance from the Army or the Defense Finance and Accounting Service she would have applied for the annuity in a timely manner.  As all relevant information appears to be available, the purpose of the barring statue is not relevant.
2.  In view of the foregoing, the Army's records should be corrected to show the applicant applied for the RCSBP annuity on 1 February 2005 and returned the application to the appropriate office in a timely manner.

BOARD VOTE:

____X  __  ____X __  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant applied for the RCSBP annuity on 1 February 2005 and returned the application to the appropriate office in a timely manner where it was processed in a timely manner.




      ___________X___________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013856



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013856



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021696

    Original file (20110021696.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a letter, dated 29 April 2011, to her from the Retired and Annuity Pay Branch, DFAS, wherein it stated her request for an SBP annuity was denied as her application was received after the 6-year statute of limitations had expired. Therefore, the record should be corrected to show she applied for the RCSBP annuity in a timely manner. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the FSM be corrected by showing the applicant applied for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003015

    Original file (20120003015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a 15 July 2002 letter, the applicant's attorney indicated she mailed documents (e.g., certified copy of the final decree of divorce, letter from the applicant, and agreement to name the applicant former spouse beneficiary under the SBP) to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Denver, CO, with a return receipt request (7109 2817 3080 0000 0491). f. the necessary documentation was sent to DFAS in a timely manner along with the agreement between the spouses and a certified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028722

    Original file (20100028722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides one of the FSM's Retiree Account Statements with an effective date of 5 December 2005. The statement shows the FSM elected spouse-only SBP coverage and shows his spouse's DOB as 27 September 1948. It would be appropriate to correct his DFAS records to show he elected former spouse coverage and option B under the RCSBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059181C070421

    Original file (2001059181C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By memorandum dated 6 June 2001, the unit’s commander confirmed that the FSM had enrolled in the RCSBP in December 1993, electing option C. Upon his death, the applicant had filled out the appropriate paperwork and submitted her claim to receive the annuity (although it appears the DD Form 1883 was submitted rather than an application for annuity, DD Form 1884). However, instead of informing the applicant that she had to submit a DD Form 1884, ARPERCEN told the applicant that she was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073290C070403

    Original file (2002073290C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It would be compassionate to correct his records to show that he elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage, option B (since it was his intent to have the SBP coverage effective upon his reaching age 60), full base amount. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP on 1 March 1997 for spouse only coverage, option B, full base amount by completing and returning the DD Form 1883 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000967

    Original file (20080000967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 December 1997, an ARPERCEN letter informed the applicant of the FSM's election to decline immediate participation in the RCSBP and of his election to defer his final SBP election until applying for retired pay at age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start RCSBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018205

    Original file (20120018205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show: * He timely submitted a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) * She is entitled to be paid the SBP annuity based on his death in 2002 2. The applicant provides: * Denial letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), dated 21 August 2012 * DD Form 2656-7 (Verification of Survivor Annuity), dated 28 July 2012 * Marriage license * Certificate of Death *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003280C070205

    Original file (20060003280C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM’s military records be corrected to show she applied for the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity in a timely manner. She also states that she was informed that she only had seven years from the FSM’s death to claim the SBP annuity. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004491

    Original file (20140004491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 26 September 2012. Unfortunately, there is no evidence the FSM changed his SBP coverage to "former spouse" coverage or the applicant deemed the election within one year of her divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087361C070212

    Original file (2003087361C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that she be determined to be entitled to a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity based on the election of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), and her timely application for the annuity. The applicant states the FSM elected coverage under the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) when it was first established. It would be equitable to correct the records to show the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 electing spouse coverage, full base amount, option C and that the...