IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 16 February 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110013709
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his general discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
2. The applicant states the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is proposing to sever his VA benefits. VA has determined his service did not warrant benefits due to his being court-martialed for being absent without leave (AWOL). He is totally disabled due to illness suffered from service in the Republic of Vietnam and has received VA benefits for 11 years.
3. The applicant provides a letter, complete date unreadable, from the VA.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 April 1965 for a period of 3 years. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
3. He accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on:
* 27 April 1965 for being AWOL from 24 - 26 April 1965
* 10 August 1965 for being AWOL from 1 - 9 August 1965
4. On 4 October 1966, he pled guilty and was found guilty before a special court-martial of being AWOL from 29 January to 7 September 1966.
5. He accepted NJP on 26 January 1968 for being AWOL from 22 - 25 January 1968.
6. On 16 April 1968, he pled guilty and was found guilty before a special court-martial of being AWOL from 31 January to 21 March 1968.
7. He accepted NJP on 12 August 1968 for being AWOL from 14 June to
8 August 1968.
8. He was processed for discharge by reason of unfitness, an established pattern of shirking. He was discharged on 22 January 1969 and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He had 638 days of time lost.
9. On 11 January 1999, the Deputy Assistant Secretary, under the authority of Title 10 U.S. Code, section 1552 (10 USC 1552), approved the recommendation of the ABCMR to void his previous discharge and change his military records to show:
a. He was unsuitable for continuation on active duty by reason of a character and behavior disorder.
b. He was released from active duty by reason of unsuitability.
c. The characterization of his service as under honorable conditions (general).
d. He was issued a General Discharge Certificate.
10. Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness and unsuitability. Paragraph 6b(2) of the regulation provided that members who were determined to suffer from character and behavior disorders were subject to separation for unsuitability. This regulation further provided that Soldiers separated by reason of unsuitability would be furnished an honorable or general discharge certificate as warranted by their military record.
11. Army Regulations 635-200 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time, provided that an honorable discharge would be furnished when the individual had conduct ratings of at least "good," had efficiency ratings of at least "fair," had not been convicted by a general court-martial, and had not been convicted more than once by a special court-martial.
12. 38 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 3.12 Character of discharge provides the characterization of discharges required to receive VA benefits.
a. Paragraph (c) lists conditions under which VA benefits are not payable. One of the conditions listed is a discharge under other than honorable conditions issued as a result of an absence without official leave for a continuous period of at least 180 days.
b. Paragraph (e) states an honorable discharge or discharge under honorable conditions issued through a board for correction of records established under the authority of 10 USC 1552 is final and conclusive on the VA. The action of the board sets aside any prior bar to benefits imposed under paragraph (c) of this section.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Based on his conviction by two special courts-martial, he is not entitled to an honorable discharge. Therefore, there is no basis to upgrade his discharge.
2. His general discharge under honorable conditions was issued through the ABCMR under the authority of 10 USC 1552 and is final and conclusive on the VA. Therefore, the previous action by the ABCMR sets aside any bar to benefits.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110013709
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110013709
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003137
The examiner stated the disorder was not medically disqualifying but should be considered in his further training or administrative disposition. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) currently sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005496
The applicant requests: * an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge * correction of his period of active duty service * his military records to be found 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unfitness. Therefore, he should provide a copy of his DD Form 214 to the National Personnel Record Center (Military Personnel Records) 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63132-5100...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000853
The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 due to unfitness with the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel) in effect at the time provides in: a. paragraph 3-7 that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018732
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically discharged. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was medically discharged.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014122
After completion of 2 months and 8 days of military service, he was honorably discharged on 20 April 1962 for the purpose of enlistment in the Regular Army. However, the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his discharge confirms he was discharged on 1 March 1968 for unfitness, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 and his characterization of service was under conditions other than honorable. On 21 November 1968, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicants request...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016059
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. Item 44 (Time Lost under Section 972, Title 10, United States Code and Subsequent to Normal Date ETS) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he had the following lost time: * 27 November to 6 December 1967 (AWOL) * 22 January 1968 (AWOL) * 4 March to 2 April 1968 (AWOL) * 3 April to 14 August 1968 (Dropped from the Rolls) * 21 August to 12 September 1968 (Confinement) * 6 July to 12...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027886
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he received a general discharge (GD) in lieu of the undesirable discharge he was issued. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he received a GD. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022432
The examiner stated: a. However, at the time of the applicant's separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided for a general discharge under honorable conditions for an individual whose military record was not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017497
Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. However, at the time of the applicant's separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002585
He respectfully requests reconsideration of the Board's decision to correct his military records to show he was discharged with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's request for reconsideration of his request for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a general discharge because his family was under extreme financial hardship during the period of service under review and based on his post-service conduct and achievements was carefully considered. Records show...