Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013670
Original file (20110013670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  18 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013670 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was absent without leave (AWOL) from 19 October to 9 December 1982 instead of 23 December 1986 to 12 February 1987.

2.  He states, in effect:

* his records should reflect the dates he was actually missing from the Army
* his USAARMC [U.S. Army Armor Center] Form 4939 (Characterization of Service Checklist for Administrative Discharge Actions) reflects the total length of time he served 
* his DD Form 214 shows he was missing 52 days from 23 December 1986 to 12 February 1987 instead of 19 October to 9 December 1982
* his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows he was missing 1,521 days which is not true

3.  He provides his DD Form 214, DA Form 2-1, USAARMC Form 4939, and DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 March 1979 and was discharged on 27 September 1981 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He completed 2 years, 6 months, and 1 day of active military service during this period.  

3.  He reenlisted in the Regular Army on 28 September 1981.  

4.  Item 21 (Time Lost) of his DA Form 2-1 shows he was AWOL from 19 October 1982 through 17 December 1986 for a total of 1,521 days.  

5.  On 19 December 1986, charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL from 19 October 1982 to 18 December 1986.  

6.  On 23 December 1986, he consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10.  In doing so, he admitted guilt to the offense charged and acknowledged that he might encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life and that he might be ineligible for many or all Army benefits administered by the Veterans Administration if an under other than other conditions (UOTHC) discharge was issued.  He did not submit statements in his own behalf.  

7.  His service record contains a DA Form 31 which shows he was placed on excess leave on 23 December 1986 to an indefinite date.  In block 30 (Remarks) of this document, he acknowledged he understood this leave was without pay and allowances, no leave would accrue during this period of absence, and any travel connected with this leave was at his own expense.  He further acknowledged he understood if his application for discharge was approved, he would be discharged while in a leave status and this leave authorization would terminate on the effective date of his discharge.  

8.  The separation authority approved his request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of court-martial with the issuance of a UOTHC discharge and a reduction to the rank of private/E-1.  
9.  Item 1 of his USAARMC Form 4939 shows his length of time served in the enlistment or period of service as 1 year, 1 month, and 7 days and item 4 shows his period of lost time due to being AWOL as 19 October 1982 to 17 December 1986.  

10.  On 12 February 1987, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a UOTHC Discharge Certificate.  He completed a total of 3 years, 8 months, and 17 days creditable active service with 1,521 days of lost time due to AWOL.  

11.  His DD Form 214 shows the following entries in:

* item 18 (Remarks), “EXCESS LEAVE OF 52 DAYS FROM 861223-870212”
* item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) “821019 – 861217”

12.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) directs that the dates of time lost during the current enlistment will be entered on the DD Form 214.  This regulation states:

   a.  Lost time under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972, is not creditable service for pay, retirement, or veterans' benefits; however, the Army preserves a record of time lost to explain which service between the date of entry on active duty and the separation date is creditable service for benefits.

	b.  For a Soldier who has excess leave status enter the total number of days and inclusive dates of time spent in an excess leave status.

13.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972(a)(2) and section 972(a)(3) states that an enlisted member of an armed force who; (1) is absent from his organization, station, or duty for more than one day without proper authority, as determined by competent authority; or (2) is confined by military or civilian authorities for more than one day in connection with a trial, whether before, during, or after the trial is liable, after his return to full duty, to serve for a period that, when added to the period that he served before his absence from duty, amounts to the term for which he was enlisted or inducted.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his records should reflect the actual dates he was missing from the Army is acknowledged.  However, the evidence of record does not indicate that an error or injustice exists in this case regarding his period of lost time.  
2.  His service record shows he was charged with being AWOL from 19 October 1982 through 17 December 1986 for a total of 1,521 days.  In accordance with the applicable statute AWOL is lost time.  

3.  Based on the governing regulation, the Army preserves a record of time lost to explain which service between the date of entry on active duty and the separation date is creditable service for benefits.  The applicant's inclusive dates of lost time due to being an AWOL status are properly reflected on his DD Form 214.  

4.  The evidence of record shows he was in an excess leave status from 23 December 1986 through 12 February 1987, the date he was discharged.  His 52 days of excess leave is properly recorded in item 18 of his DD Form 214.  

5.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.   

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013670



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013670



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021077

    Original file (20130021077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the entries in item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) of her DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the periods ending 24 August 1987 and 23 June 1988. It stated that personnel officers were to use any available records to complete the DD Form 214. The record clearly shows that the applicant had active service prior to serving as an AGR Soldier from 6 June 1986 to 24 August 1987.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011498

    Original file (20090011498.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. On 22 March 1988, the applicant requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10 (Discharge for the Good of the Service). The evidence of records also shows the applicant completed the 5-week Fire Support (MOS 13F1O) Course at Fort Sill in 1986 and this course is not recorded in item 14 of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007904

    Original file (20080007904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 July 1982, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 for the good of the service, and directed the applicant receive an UOTHC discharge and that he be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. There is no evidence showing that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. 3 The evidence of record confirms the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023675

    Original file (20100023675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 3 years and 10 days in the enlistment or period of service; b. The evidence shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. The characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the evidence shows he was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000386

    Original file (20090000386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he would like for the Board [Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)] to upgrade his discharge to a general discharge under honorable conditions. The record shows that on 15 May 1990 the applicant was discharged accordingly. Further, the applicant's discharge reflects his overall record of military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022775

    Original file (20120022775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. (4) Because of the applicant's inability to effect an adequate adjustment to the military, it was recommended that he be considered for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13 (Unsuitability). The applicant contends that his discharge under other than honorable conditions should be upgraded because he had approximately 4 years of prior honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000935

    Original file (20090000935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States), dated 24 November 2008; two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with effective dates of 30 July 1981 and 30 November 1988; and a five-page self-authored statement accompanied by 66 enclosures documenting her training, awards, achievements, and certifications earned during both her military service and after her discharge from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021505

    Original file (20090021505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Army National Guard on 23 February 1977 and served until he was issued a general discharge and involuntarily ordered to active duty on 11 July 1978. The applicant stated that he understood he could request this discharge for the good of the service because charges had been preferred against him under the UCMJ which authorized the imposition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004505

    Original file (20120004505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 June 1987, following counseling, the applicant submitted a voluntary written request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations). On 6 July 1987, the separation authority approved the applicant's request and directed he be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Further, it appears the applicant's discharge reflects his overall record of military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002429

    Original file (20070002429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 8 (Statement of Examinee’s Present Health and Medications Currently Used), shows the applicant noted, “Epilepsy & Dilantin - Good.” The applicant's military service records also contain an SF 88, dated 14 April 1980, prepared by the physician upon his medical examination of the applicant prior to his separation from the U.S. Army. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s medical condition (i.e., epilepsy) is documented in his military service records; specifically, in his...