Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013307
Original file (20110013307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  2 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013307 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in the rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  He held the rank of SGT at the time he was transferred from active duty to the inactive Reserve; however, he was discharged in the rank of SP4.

   b.  He has reenlisted in the USAR and he would like to have his rank fixed.
   
   c.  He has payroll stubs confirming he held the rank of SGT when he entered the inactive Reserve.
   
   d.  He wants his honorable discharge order to show he held the rank of SGT and a copy of the correction forwarded to him.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Award Certificate
* two Reassignment Orders
* three DA Forms 3686 (Leave and Earnings Statements)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military record shows he initially enlisted in the USAR, on 29 March 1979, in the rank of private (PVT/E-1).  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 64C (Motor Transport Operator).

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted accordingly in item 18 (Appointments and Reductions):

PV2
USAR
791018
PFC
USAR
800109
SP4
USAR
810910
SP5
USAR
840722
SGT
USAR
851001
4.  On 13 February 1989, Headquarters, First United States Army and Fort George G. Meade, published Orders Number 28-9.  The applicant was transferred within the Reserve Components, Control Groups, or units from his current unit to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) (also known as Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)) effective 13 February 1989, in the rank of SGT.

5.  On 24 April 1991, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, published Orders Number D-04-012652.  It directed the applicant's discharge from the IRR in the rank of SP4, effective 24 April 1991.

6.  There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was ever reduced from SGT to SP4.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show he was discharged from the USAR Control Group on 24 April 1991, in the rank of SGT.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to SGT on 1 October 1985, and this was the rank he held at the time of his transfer to the IRR on 13 February 1989.

3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged from the IRR on 24 April 1991 in the rank of SP4.  However, while he remained in an active status of the IRR from 13 February 1989 through 24 April 1991, he performed no military service and his record contains no evidence showing he was ever reduced during this period or at any time during his military service.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show he was discharged from the IRR on 24 April 1991, in the rank of SGT.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was discharged from the Ready Reserve, on 24 April 1991, in the rank of sergeant, and providing him a document that shows this correction.




      __________X______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013307



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013307



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020048

    Original file (20140020048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 January 1988, the OKARNG published Orders 19-14 discharging the applicant from the OKARNG with an under honorable conditions discharge, effective 8 February 1988 and transferring him to the USAR Control Group (IRR), in accordance with paragraph 8-27g of NGR 600-200. On 5 August 1989, Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 377th Infantry Regiment, published Orders 08-01 reducing the applicant from SP4/E-4 to private first class (PFC)/E-3 effective 5 August 1989 in accordance with Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015368

    Original file (20140015368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a new issue, he requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 for his Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Advanced Camp service in 1988 and that this DD Form 214 show his pay grade as E-5. Regarding the correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991 to show his pay grade as E-5, the evidence of record, as well as that provided by the applicant, does not support the granting of this request. c. As further evidence he no longer held the pay grade of E-5 after disenrollment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005469

    Original file (20140005469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 and all back pay due as a result of the correction. Items 4a, 4b, and 12h of his 21 February 1986 DD Form 214 show this information as his rank, grade, and the effective date. c. Thus, the evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his correct rank, grade, and effective date as of the date he was REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021642

    Original file (20090021642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged from the Mississippi Army National Guard (MSARNG) in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and correction of his qualifying years for non-regular retirement to include all of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and ARNG service. On 18 January 1989, Headquarters, 223rd Engineer Battalion, published Orders 1-4 reducing the applicant from SGT/E-5 to SP4/E-4 for inefficiency, effective 9...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025401

    Original file (20100025401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides several service record documents. His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that shows in item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) the highest rank/grade he held during his period of active service was SP4/E-4 with a date of rank of 17 December 1971, based on Special Orders Number 4, issued by Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division, dated in 1972. The documents submitted by the applicant to substantiate his request to change his rank/grade as shown on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002338

    Original file (20080002338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Separation Documents (DD Forms 214), dated 25 October 1968 and 25 October 1971; Retiree Account Statement; Report of Physical Examination (SF 88), dated 17 June 1987; Retirement Credit Record (NGB Form 23); and identification (ID) card. The evidence of record in this case shows that the applicant had attained the rank of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009321

    Original file (20100009321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's service record does not indicate he completed 90 days or more of continuous active duty after 11 June 1991. Therefore, the applicant is not eligible for issuance of a DD Form 214 to show the following actions which occurred after the period covered his DD Form 214, dated 11 June 1991: * promotion to SGT/E-5 effective 29 June 1992 * 2 years of time in grade which he served in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008301

    Original file (20080008301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Items 5a (Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of the applicant’s National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows the entries SP4 and E-4, respectively. There is no evidence in the applicant's records, and the applicant did not provide any evidence, that shows he had an out-of-State job transfer while serving in the Army National Guard. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit any evidence that shows he was promoted again to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011355

    Original file (20110011355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement * 20-Year Letter, dated 20 April 2000 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 June 1991 * Undated memorandum, subject: Enrollment in Phase I Course * Active duty order * 3 Certificates (Army Achievement Medal, Outstanding Dedicated Service, Honorable Discharge) * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 1 June 1998 * Released from active duty (REFRAD) order *...