Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013143
Original file (20110013143.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  10 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013143 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service number as "USXXXXX798" instead of "USXXXXX293."

2.  He states his service number should be shown as "USXXXXX798."

3.  He provides:

* his DD Form 214
* his U.S. Armed Forces Institute-Japan General Educational Development (GED) Certificate
* three envelopes addressed to him postmarked in 1960
* A Retirement, Survivors and Disability Insurance - Notice of Award issued by the U.S. Social Security Administration

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His record contains a DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) which shows his service number as "USXXXXX798" at the time of his induction into the Army of the United States.  A review of the remaining documents contained in his military personnel record shows his service number consistently appears as "USXXXXX798" throughout his tenure of service.

3.  The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant at the time of his separation shows his service number as "USXXXXX293."

4.  He provides the following documents which all show his service number as "USXXXXX798":

* his DD Form 214
* HIS GED Certificate
* three envelopes addressed to him postmarked in 1960
* a Retirement, Survivors and Disability Insurance - Notice of Award issued by the U.S. Social Security Administration

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army and establishes the standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's separation stated the complete name and service number of the separating service member would be entered on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his service number as "USXXXXX798" was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

2.  His service number consistently appears as "USXXXXX798" in his military personnel record.  As such, the service number on the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant at the time of his separation was clearly erroneous.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this document to show his service number as "USXXXXX798."


BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X___   GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned by corrected by deleting the current entry from item 2 (Service Number) of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the service number shown on his DD Form 47.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013143



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013143



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012555

    Original file (20130012555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    All of the documents contained in the applicant’s Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (previously known as the official military personnel file) lists SSN “XXX-XX-XX8X,” which he now claims is incorrect. His record clearly lists this SSN on all applicable documents maintained throughout his military service. Absent convincing independent and verifiable evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the applicant's military service records, including the DD Form 214, were correct at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015679

    Original file (20110015679.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The new evidence provided by the applicant shows the FSM completed the required SBP plan election forms on 10 December 1997, within 90 days of receipt of his Twenty Year Letter, as evidenced by the envelope provided that contained the documents, which is postmarked 28 October 1997. Given the documents provided by the applicant, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the record to show the FSM elected full immediate RCSBP coverage under Option C for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003287

    Original file (20120003287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he served on active duty from 4 January 1945 to 28 August 1946. He further states the applicant left the Merchant Marines in August 1945; d. a 17 August 1989 letter from the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, advising the applicant that his application for discharge was approved and a DD Form 214 was furnished; and e. Administrative Action Record Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020694

    Original file (20140020694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * an undated, self-authored statement * an envelope, postdated 7 November 2012 and 5 January 2013 * a portion of a lease agreement, printed on 3 September 2013 * his divorce decree, dated 14 November 2012 * a letter from the Fort Bragg, North Carolina MPO, dated 28 August 2013 * a letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), dated 28 July 2014 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His record contains a divorce decree, dated 14 November 2012, which shows Claudia...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017524

    Original file (20130017524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as XXX-XX-4026 and his dates of foreign service in Vietnam. The evidence indicates an administrative error was made when recording the applicant's SSN on his DD Form 214 and it should be corrected. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000164

    Original file (20120000164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * His DD Form 214 * A letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 19 December 2011 * A copy of an envelope * Orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed 1 year, 1 month, and 9 days of foreign service and his most significant duty assignment was with the 65th Engineer Combat Battalion, Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011392

    Original file (20080011392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Item 31 (Permanent Address for Mailing Purposes After Transfer or Discharge), be changed to 1__7 North Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois. It was postmarked 20 April 1965 [nearly 2 months before his induction] and shows his mother's return address and his address at his work location in Chicago. Therefore, changing this address would not show that he returned to Illinois after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011757

    Original file (20110011757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This document shows his SSN as "XXX-XX-XXX8." As such, it appears the SSN on the DD Form 214, DD Form 256A, and DD Form 2542 issued to the applicant at the time of his separation were all the result of a typographical error that was made on his discharge orders.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010133C070208

    Original file (20040010133C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states, in effect, the statement provided by the FSM's niece clearly shows the FSM's intent for the applicant to receive RCSBP benefits, as well as the fact that he completed a DD Form 1883 identifying the applicant as beneficiary of his RCSBP annuity; and that these documents were included with other important paperwork. Counsel further indicates that based on the sworn statements provided with the application, it is clear the FSM completed and returned a DD Form 1883 and elected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007776

    Original file (20090007776.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that items 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 4 September 1969 be corrected to show specialist five/E-5 instead of specialist four/E-4. In the absence of promotion orders to specialist five, the documentation provided by the applicant which show his rank as specialist five are not sufficient as a basis for amending items 5a and 5b on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 4 September...