Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013057
Original file (20110013057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013057 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the:

* Army Good Conduct Medal 
* Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service stars 
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation
* Presidential Unit Citation 
* Meritorious Unit Commendation 
* Valorous Unit Award 
* any other unit awards and decorations authorized

2.  The applicant states the error occurred when he left Vietnam and the Army.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 for the period ending 11 June 1969
* Letter from the National Personnel Records Center
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction 
of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 
or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, and has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2. On 26 September 1966, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and he held military occupational specialty 73C (Finance Specialist).  He served in Vietnam during the period 9 June 1967 through 8 July 1968 with the 176th, 28th, and 29th Finance Sections.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 11 July 1969.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

4.  His records do not contain official orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal.

5.  A review of his service record shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service.  His record is void of any derogatory information in the form of lost time, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions that would disqualify him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There are no entries in his record to indicate his commanders denied him award of this award during this period of service.

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all 


"excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  This same regulation states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each credited campaign Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, participation credit was awarded for the following campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, 1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968
* Tet Counteroffensive, 30 January - 1 April 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV, 2 April - 30 June 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V, 1 July - 1 November 1968

8.  Department of the Army General Order 8, dated 1974, awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Device to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  Army Pamphlet 672-3 does not include a listing of the units the applicant served in during his Vietnam service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms he served honorably on active duty during the period 26 September 1966 through 11 July 1969.  His record is void of any evidence that shows he had lost time or that he received nonjudicial punishment or court-martial action during that period of service.  His record shows he consistently received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  Absent any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 September 1966 through 11 July 1969 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

2.  He participated in four campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.

3.  General orders awarded all units in Vietnam the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show this award.

4.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 does not include any of the units he served with in Vietnam.  Therefore, there is no basis to amend his DD Form 214 to show the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, Presidential Unit Citation, Meritorious Unit Commendation, or the Valorous Unit Award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  _____x__  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 
26 September 1966 through 11 July 1969; and

	b.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) 
* four bronze service stars to be worn on his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal 
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the Republic of Vietnam Civil 


Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, Presidential Unit Citation, Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the Valorous Unit Award.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013057



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013057



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005245

    Original file (20090005245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. The applicant’s service records show he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service and was promoted to specialist five during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016027

    Original file (20120016027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 December 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120016027 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214 the overseas service bar and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000509

    Original file (20100000509.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 29 (Qualification in Arms) that he qualified Marksman with the M-16 rifle on 29 December 1966; b. item 31 (Foreign Service) that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 16 February 1967 through 7 April 1969; c. item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he was assigned to: (1) Signal Company, 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne), 1st Special Forces, from 21 February through 7 May 1967; (2) Headquarters and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017192

    Original file (20080017192.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect during the Vietnam era, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the Good Conduct Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the appropriate number of service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal, two Overseas Service Bars, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Meritorious Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003092

    Original file (20150003092.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. The evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005912

    Original file (20140005912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * authorization for issuance of awards, dated 29 November 1984 * citations for award of the Presidential Unit Award and Valorous Unit Award CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003322

    Original file (20110003322.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 26 September 1966 to 20 August 1968; and b. amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 to include the: * Army Good Conduct Medal *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006818

    Original file (20090006818.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 17 December 1969 to read Company B, 4th Aviation Battalion, 4th Infantry Division. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020261

    Original file (20100020261.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect all awards, citations, and medals earned during his active service from April 1966 to June 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027443

    Original file (20100027443.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Records) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service. Therefore, he is entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 December 1966 through 11 December 1968 and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of...