Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013029
Original file (20110013029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013029 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change the reason for separation to physically unfit.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he believes his record is in error based on the determination by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214; DD Form 214C (Continuation Sheet); and a memorandum from the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, dated 19 July 2010.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 14 September 2003, the applicant entered active duty as a mobilized U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Soldier in the rank of staff sergeant/pay grade E-6.

2.  In a memorandum, dated 17 December 2009, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis (HRC-STL), Missouri, notified the applicant of his eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 [20-year letter].

3.  On 16 June 2010, a physical evaluation board (PEB) convened to consider the applicant's physical condition.

	a.  The PEB found the applicant unfit for further military duty based on his right and left knee chrondromalacia resulting from striking them into a dashboard during an improvised explosive device blast, each rated at 10 percent disabling with a combined disability rating of 20 percent.

	b.  The disability was incurred as a result of a combat-related injury in a combat zone.

	c.  The applicant was informed that with a disability rating of less than 30 percent, and having at least 20 qualifying years for non-regular retirement, he had the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting his Reserve retirement pay or requesting transfer to an inactive Reserve status and receiving Reserve retired pay at age 60.

	d.  The applicant concurred with the PEB findings and waived a formal hearing.

4.  In a memorandum to the Commander, HRC-STL, dated 19 July 2010, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency determined the applicant was to be transferred to the Retired Reserve and was eligible to apply for retirement benefits upon reaching 60 years of age.

5.  Orders 031-0004, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, dated 31 January 2011, released the applicant not by reason of physical disability and assigned him to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 15 February 2011.  The additional instructions further stated he returned from deployment and completed his required active duty.

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 February 2011 indicates:

	a.  in item 26 (Separation Code) – "MBK" [completion of required active service] and

	b.  in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – "Completion of Required Active Service."

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It states:

	a.  the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty;

	b.  it is a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge;

	c.  it is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service; and

	d.  it requires an entry in items 26 and 28 showing the separation program designator code and narrative reason for the Soldier's separation from active duty based on regulatory or other authority.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has an impairment rated at less than 30-percent disabling.  It further provides in section 1201 for the physical disability retirement of a member who has an impairment rated at least 30-percent disabling.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was separated due to a physical disability.

2.  On 16 June 2010, a PEB found the applicant unfit for further military duty based on his right and left knee chrondromalacia resulting from striking them into a dashboard during an improvised explosive device blast, each rated at 10 percent disabling with a combined disability rating of 20 percent.  The applicant was informed that with a disability rating of less than 30 percent, and having at least 20 qualifying years for non-regular retirement, he had the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting his Reserve retirement pay or requesting transfer to an inactive Reserve status and receiving Reserve retired pay at age 60.  The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was advised of his options with regard to receiving disability severance pay or applying for retired pay at age 60.

3.  The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant returned from deployment and completed his required period of active duty on 15 February 2011.  Accordingly, he was released from active duty and transferred to the Retired Reserve.

4.  There is no apparent error or injustice.

5.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013029



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013029



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026196

    Original file (20100026196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant elected not to concur with the PEB's findings and recommendations and requested a formal hearing. b. the PEB also noted the applicant had a rating of less than 30% and at least 20 qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement under the provisions of chapter 67 of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC); therefore, he had the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting his Reserve retirement pay, or he had the option of requesting a transfer to inactive Reserve status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015500

    Original file (20110015500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) stated, “As a Soldier with a rating of less than 30% who may have at least 20 qualifying years for Reserve retirement UP Chapter 67, Title 10, USC, you may have the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting your Reserve retirement pay, or you may request transfer to inactive Reserve status and receive Reserve retired pay at age 60” (22 January 2007). These statements were interpreted to mean he was requesting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017271

    Original file (20090017271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically retired or retained on active duty and given a physical profile. The DA Form 199, block 13 (Election of Soldier) shows that on 22 July 2002 the applicant concurred with the PEB's findings and recommendations and waived his right to a formal hearing of his case. Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-19 states when a Soldier has a rating of less than 30 percent and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019406

    Original file (20100019406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his records be corrected so that he may receive retired pay at age 60. Since he was originally eligible for retired pay at age 60, has repaid his severance pay, and his orders and NGB Form 22 assigned him to the Retired Reserve, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct his record by voiding his 30 September 1991 disability discharge with severance pay and to show he was transferred to Retired Reserve on that same date. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002259

    Original file (20140002259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was retired due to physical disability. A DA Form 3947 (MEB Proceedings), dated in October 2004, reports: a. an MEB convened to evaluate his medical conditions: * Chronic bilateral ankle pain * Severe bilateral pes planus * Bilateral talar avascular necrosis b. all of the evaluated conditions were found to be unacceptable and he no longer met medical retention standards; c. he did not desire to continue on active duty;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004167

    Original file (20130004167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she was transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 instead of discharged due to disability with severance pay. Army Regulation 635-40 states that when a Soldier has a disability rating of less than 30 percent and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for non-Regular service, "You have the option of accepting discharge with disability severance pay and forfeiting retirement for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005543

    Original file (20120005543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following documents were received with his application: * memorandum, Headquarters, I Corps and Fort Lewis, dated 29 April 2002, subject: Line of Duty Investigations DA Form 2173 * Accident Report Number DX45H6003, dated 21 October 2003 * emergency care and treatment record, dated 22 October 2003 * contested hearing subpoena, dated 3 February 2004 * memorandum, Personnel Officer, dated 15 March 2004, subject: Line of Duty Investigation (Applicant) * memorandum, Headquarters, I Corps and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012639

    Original file (20080012639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the State of North Carolina published orders on 2 January 1996 which indicate the applicant was being processed for separation and that he was authorized disability severance pay. Since it appears the applicant was not properly informed that if he accepted severance pay then he would not be eligible for retired pay, and since he understands that granting his request would require him to pay back his severance pay, it would be equitable to restore the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017968

    Original file (20140017968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 instead of discharged due to disability with severance pay. The applicant states, in effect, he was medically discharged with severance pay; however, he does not understand why he does not have retirement status after serving 23 years in the Army National Guard (ARNG). The commissary and exchange privileges are valid for a two-year period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006599

    Original file (20110006599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 August 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110006599 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, his records show he was retired due to a temporary disability.