Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013025
Original file (20110013025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  12 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013025 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, change of her character of service from uncharacterized to a general discharge.

2.  The applicant states:

* She did not complete her first full term because she was young, hurt, and she thought she could do it on her own
* She did not know the birth control she was taking at the time helped cause her medical problems
* She would like her discharge changed for future job purposes

3.  The applicant provides:

* Service medical records
* Counseling form
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 14 April 1984.  She enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 22 October 2003.

2.  Records show she was diagnosed with tendonitis in both knees and hips.

3.  On 10 January 2004, she was recommended for the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Program (PTRP) based upon an injury and the fact she was unable to continue in basic training.

4.  On 10 February 2004, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for disobeying a lawful order (possessing a cell phone and charger).

5.  A memorandum, dated 11 February 2004, states the applicant arrived at the PTRP on 15 January 2004 due to an injury sustained while in basic training.  Medical services initiated treatment but the applicant did not desire to participate in rehabilitation.

6.  On 13 February 2004, she was counseled on her lack of motivation.

7.  The applicant’s unit commander initiated action to separate her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, for entry level status performance and conduct.  The commander cited the applicant's lack of motivation as the reason for the proposed separation action.  He also recommended she receive an entry level separation with an uncharacterized characterization of service.

8.  On 18 February 2004, she acknowledged notification of the recommendation for her separation.  Having been afforded the opportunity to consult with counsel she declined the opportunity to do so and elected not to make a statement in her own behalf.

9.  The separation authority subsequently approved the recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 with an uncharacterized discharge.

10.  On 25 February 2004, the applicant was discharged accordingly by reason of entry level performance and conduct.  She completed 4 months and 4 days of creditable active service.

11.  Item 24 (Character of Service) of the DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows the entry "Uncharacterized."

12.  On 21 September 2010, the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of her discharge from uncharacterized to a general discharge to be able to get job and education benefits to better herself.  On
7 June 2011, after carefully reviewing her application, military records, and all other available evidence, the ADRB denied the applicant's request to upgrade her discharge.
13.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct) of this regulation provides for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance or conduct (or both) while in an entry level status.  This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had demonstrated inability, lack of reasonable effort, or failure to adapt to the military environment.  The Soldier’s service is uncharacterized when separated under this chapter.

14.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a separation will be described as an entry level separation with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry level status.  Entry level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

15.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The governing regulation states a separation will be described as an entry level separation with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry level status.  The applicant was in an entry level status when she was discharged on 25 February 2004.  Therefore, her character of service is properly reflected in item 24 of her DD Form 214.

2.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service.  It merely means that the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013025



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013025



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999015565

    Original file (1999015565.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. AR Number: 1999015565 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990210 A9321 Character of Service: EL A9411 Date of Discharge: 980709 A0100 Authority: AR 635-200 C11 Reason: A2900 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A PART IX - VOTING RECORDName...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014226

    Original file (20140014226 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to change his characterization of service from uncharacterized to general, under honorable conditions. His record reveals a DA Form 4856 (General Counseling Form) in his separation packet, dated 8 May 1998, which shows he was counseled by his Company Commander for entry level separation (ELS), regarding his refusal to participate in the PTRP (Physical Training and Rehabilitation Program), which was going to result in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025018

    Original file (20110025018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he received a medical discharge. A DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination) completed on the same date shows a physician determined that he was qualified for service. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he received a medical discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018770

    Original file (20110018770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. She was prescribed medication, placed on a profile with a follow-up in 3 to 5 days. She further stated her understanding that if the separation authority approved her separation, she would receive an uncharacterized discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025501

    Original file (20100025501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 25 April 1983, the applicant’s unit commander initiated action to separate her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, for entry level status performance and conduct. The commander cited: * her inability to meet the standards of military training * poor duty performance and attitude toward military service 5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012293

    Original file (20110012293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 July 1991, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 with an uncharacterized character of service. Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) confirms she was discharged in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 with an uncharacterized character of service. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022397

    Original file (20120022397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 June 1987, the applicant's immediate commander notified her of his intent to initiate separation action against her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11 (Entry Level Status Performance and Conduct (Trainee Discharge Program)), by reason of lack of motivation and discipline necessary to be a productive Soldier. On 19 August 1987, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005553

    Original file (20140005553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 February 1987, her commander notified her that under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) he was contemplating action to release her from active duty for transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) for entry level status performance and conduct. Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, in effect at the time, set policy and provided guidance for the separation of personnel because of unsatisfactory performance or conduct (or both) while...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100021489

    Original file (AR20100021489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for lack of ability, lack of self discipline, lack of motivation, and repeatedly failed the Army Physical Fitness Test, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 24 November 2004, the separation authority waived further...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018480

    Original file (AR20080018480.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 November 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No...