Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012828
Original file (20110012828.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	

		BOARD DATE:	  12 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110012828 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show three awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

2.  The applicant states:

* There are no awards of the ARCOM shown on his DD Form 214
* He is supposed to have three awards of the ARCOM
* These awards were for 1989, 1990-1991, and 1996-1999

3.  The applicant provides:

* Orders for the ARCOM, dated 7 April 1991
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 May 1987.  He served as a unit supply specialist in Southwest Asia.  On 24 March 2002, he was honorably discharged by reason of completion of required active service.

3.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show any awards of the ARCOM.

4.  Permanent Orders 000010-006, issued by Headquarters, 1st Brigade,
1st Cavalry Division, dated 7 April 1991, awarded him the ARCOM for meritorious achievement during Operation Desert Storm during the period
17 January 1991 to 10 March 1991.

5.  Permanent Order 054-3, issued by Headquarters, 4th Brigade, 1st Armored Division, dated 24 February 1999, awarded him the ARCOM for meritorious service during the period 11 January 1996 to 11 January 1999.

6.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was awarded an ARCOM in 1989.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Orders show the applicant was awarded two awards of the ARCOM.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards.

2.  Although he contends he received three awards of the ARCOM, there are no orders for any other ARCOM in the available records and he provided no orders for any additional awards of the ARCOM.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for adding a third award of the ARCOM to his DD Form 214.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x_____  __x______  ____x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the ARCOM (2nd Award).

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding a third award of ARCOM to his DD Form 214.



      _________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012828



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012828



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009397C070206

    Original file (20050009397C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders show he received the first award of the AAM for the period 9 January 1990 through 28 January 1990; the second award of the AAM for the period 15 July 1988 through 5 November 1991; and a third award of the AAM for the period 15 June 1988 through 15 December 1991. Although the evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded ASI "Q9," there is no evidence of record which shows he completed the Traffic Accident Investigation Course. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015142

    Original file (20090015142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an additional award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and two additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Evidence of record contains orders that support two awards of the AAM. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show he was awarded a third award of the AAM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609487C070209

    Original file (9609487C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also, he requests correction of his records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. The U.S. Army Enlistment Eligibility Activity (USAEEA), in a comment, opined that the reentry code RE-3C is correct as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 in accordance with table 3-6, Army Regulation 601-210, dated 14 February 1990. The reentry code of RE-3C applies to persons who have completed more than 4 months service who do not meet the basic eligibility pay grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018324

    Original file (20130018324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 July 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130018324 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the ARCOM, AGCM, and ASUA to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015258

    Original file (20080015258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued upon retirement shows, in part, he was awarded the ARCOM (Fifth OLC) and the AAM (Third OLC). The orders contained in the applicant's military records show that he was awarded three AAMs, seven ARCOMs, and one MSM. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022767

    Original file (20110022767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 did not list a marksmanship qualification badge. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 October 2011 to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 October 2011 the: * Meritorious Service Medal (2nd Award) * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023481

    Original file (20100023481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 3 June 1999 to show the: * Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (NPDR) with Numeral "2" * United Nations Medal (UNM) for the United Nations Operation in Somalia (UNOSOM) * Senior Aircraft Crew Member Badge [now called the Senior Aviation Badge] * North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) with one...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005113

    Original file (20140005113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The regulation stated that for an active duty Soldier deployed with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service, the statement "SERVICE IN (name of country deployed) FROM (inclusive dates for example, YYYYMMDD-YYYYMMDD)" would be entered in item 18. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017627

    Original file (20080017627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides, in support of his application, a DA Form 638-1 (Recommendation for Award (For Other Than Valor) of Army Achievement Medal (AAM), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and Meritorious Service Medal (MSM)), dated 11 July 1991; and Permanent Orders 29-14, dated 13 February 1990, awarding him the first award of the ARCOM. The DA Form 638-1 provided by the applicant shows he was awarded the ARCOM with 1st oak leaf cluster for meritorious service during the period 15 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013274

    Original file (20100013274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and certificates showing he was awarded the AM, ARCOM, AAM, and AGCM. Based on this evidence of record, the applicant is entitled to correction of his record to show award of the SWASM with three bronze service stars, KLM-SA, and the KLM-KU. While the applicant's records do not contain orders for the AGCM, the applicant was awarded the AM, ARCOM, and AAM for meritorious achievement, he was promoted to pay grade E-5, and there is no evidence of...