Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012810
Original file (20110012810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110012810 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his debt in the amount of $24,495.18 be remitted or cancelled.

2.  The applicant states he applied for remission or cancellation of indebtedness in the amount of $24,495.18 and it was approved in a partial amount of $12,247.59.  He further states the review determined that no grounds existed to remit or cancel the debt based on hardship or injustice.  He goes on to state that the movers came to both homes and conducted a pre-inspection and at no time did anyone mention he might be over the weight limit, let alone in excess of $24,000.00.  He also states if he had been given a warning that he would be over his weight limit he would not have shipped all of his household goods so as to ensure that he would be under the weight limit and not place himself in an unexpected debt. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* a DD Form 1797 (Personal Property Counseling Checklist)
* memoranda from his company and battalion commanders supporting the cancellation of his indebtedness
* a memorandum from a Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) official recommending approval of his request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 June 1997 for a period of 4 years, training as a medical specialist, and a cash enlistment bonus.  He completed his training at Fort Sam Houston, TX and was transferred to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 23 June 2000 and on 2 October 2002 he reenlisted under the bonus extension and retraining (BEAR) program for a period of 5 years, training as a respiratory specialist, and a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB).

2.  He completed his training and he was transferred to Hawaii in November 2002.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 July 2004 and on 15 May 2007 he reenlisted for a period of 4 years.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 1 July 2007.  In 2008 he was accepted into the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Enlisted Commissioning Program (AECP).

3.  He departed Hawaii in June 2009 and he was transferred to South Carolina State University where he obtained a Bachelor of Science Degree in Nursing in May 2011.

4.  On 5 October 2011, the applicant was honorably discharged to accept a commission in the Army.  At the time he served 14 years, 3 months, and 11 days of creditable active service. On 6 October 2011, he was appointed a second lieutenant in the Army Nurse Corps and he was transferred to Fort Sam Houston to complete the Basic Officer Leaders Course.

5.  The applicant has not provided any documentation related to the amount he was overweight or his actual indebtedness with his application.  However, information received from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff – G-4 indicates the applicant’s case was reviewed by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) for remission or cancellation of indebtedness and approved in a partial amount of $12,247.59.  However, HRC determined no grounds existed to remit or cancel the debt for hardship or injustice.

6.  A review of the DD Form 1797 provided by the applicant, dated 22 May 2009, shows he was advised that his shipping weight allowance was 13,000 pounds.

7.  A review of the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) shows that at the time the applicant was transferred to Hawaii in the pay grade of E-5 in November 2002, his maximum weight allowance was 9,000 pounds.


8.  Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) serves as the authority for processing applications for remission/cancellation of indebtedness.  It states a debt to the government may be cancelled if it is determined that based on the information received, an injustice or hardship, or both, exist.  It also states that the Soldier’s awareness of policy and procedures will be considered as well as whether or not the Soldier inquired of proper authority and was told that the payment was correct.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his debt should be remitted or cancelled has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  The applicant has not provided any documentation with his application that explains his debt, the amount or cause of his being overweight, or any explanation as to how or why he accumulated such a large amount of household goods or why he was making shipments from two homes.

3.  He was authorized to ship 9,000 pounds of household goods when he went to Hawaii and 13,000 pounds when he departed Hawaii.  Given he was a senior noncommissioned officer, it is reasonable to presume that he would have understood the weight limitations he was under in regard to accumulating and shipping additional household goods.

4.  Additionally, the applicant has not provided any evidence or explanation as to how the payment of his debt would cause a hardship or how it constitutes an injustice.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012810



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012810



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011717

    Original file (20150011717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests remission of his indebtedness to the government in the amount of $2,448.49 for shipment of excess household goods (HHGs). The commander stated the applicant was the sole provider for his wife and two children, and as such, the debt incurred during his PCS move proved to be an overwhelming burden. The applicant submitted a DA Form 3508 to the Fort Bragg Finance Office that shows he was requesting remission or cancellation of his indebtedness based on hardship.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015501

    Original file (20110015501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he was authorized shipment of 25,270 pounds of household goods in connection with his permanent duty station move in 2006. The applicant provides a memorandum dated 13 June 2010, wherein the Chief, Operations Management Division, HRC, states: a. that the applicant submitted a request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness; b. that the request was approved in a partial amount of $7,565.31; c. that it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008384

    Original file (20120008384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests cancellation of indebtedness that resulted from exceeding his authorized weight allowance for the shipment of his household goods (HHG) from Fort Lewis, WA to Fort Hood, TX. The applicant provides: * Orders 278-06E, issued by Area Support Group – Kuwait, dated 4 October 2008 * DD Form 1299 (Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property) * memorandum from the applicant, dated 11 September 2009 * e-mail traffic from Ms. Bxxxxxx Qxxxxxx, dated 8 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082281C070215

    Original file (2002082281C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : That the HHG weight allowance for a career enlisted soldier serving in the rank of sergeant major (SGM) is unjustly low when compared to that of a junior grade officer. In June 2002, the applicant submitted a request to have his debt remitted or cancelled.

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-061

    Original file (2005-061.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argued that having to pay more than $6,000 above what he expected to pay for the overage because of misinformation he received from the Transportation Office is a sig- nificant injustice given that he “used an authorized government supported web site to calculate my overage cost as directed by a government expert.” APPLICABLE LAW Article 11.F. § 461, the Secretary may remit or cancel the debt of an enlisted member to the United States “when recovery would be against equity and good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101138C070208

    Original file (2004101138C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-4 provides instructions for submitting and processing applications for remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the United States Army. The applicant’s request for cancellation or remission of the debt he incurred as a result of a shipment of excess weight was carefully considered. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s HHG shipment exceeded his authorized weight allowance.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081806C070215

    Original file (2002081806C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In his request, he stated at the time of his enlistment, his recruiter stated he would arrange for the shipment of the applicant’s household goods. Army Regulation 600-4 provides instructions for submitting and processing applications for remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the United States Army. In view of the facts of this case, the Board finds sufficient evidence to show that the late notification of the debt incurred by the applicant resulted in there being insufficient time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097611C070212

    Original file (03097611C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In an undated memorandum, the applicant’s battalion commander reiterated the applicant’s claim that she was told not to worry about her excess household goods and that she had been informed that if she was charged at all she would received notification “well ahead of time.” He confirmed that the applicant submitted an application for remission/cancellation of her debt on the same day she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006328

    Original file (20120006328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * as directed by permanent change of station (PCS) orders, he was required to move from Fort Carson to Fort Leonard Wood * he requested a PPM instead of having the government move his household goods (HHG) * as a requirement for claiming travel expenses, he had his moving truck weighed full near Kansas City, MO * at one point during his family's travels to Fort Leonard Wood, he stopped to assist his wife with the care of their then 3-month old daughter * while assisting...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002777

    Original file (0002777.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, at the time of his PCS the member’s weight allowance for the shipping of HHGs was 4,225 pounds, plus 1,100 pounds of UB. There has been no evidence submitted to show that he informed the destination site that his shipment exceeded the weight allowed for the shipping of his HHGs, nor did he request to have his shipment reweighed. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...