Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012612
Original file (20110012612.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110012612 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 April 2005 to show his award of the Combat Action Badge (CAB).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the CAB after his release from active duty (REFRAD) and it was not added to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of orders awarding him the CAB.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was serving in the Maine Army National Guard (MEARNG) with Company C, 133d Engineer Battalion in military occupational specialty (MOS) 62J (general construction equipment operator) when he was ordered to active duty on 7 December 2003 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He deployed to Kuwait/Iraq in 2004 and on 2 April 2005 he was honorably REFRAD at the completion of required active service.  He completed 1 year, 3 months, and
26 days of creditable active service during this period.

3.  A memorandum, issued by Joint Force Headquarters, MEARNG, Camp Keyes, Augusta, ME, dated 26 October 2005, awarded the applicant the CAB for performing assigned duties in a hostile fire/imminent danger pay (HF/IDP) authorized area.  He was personally present and actively engaging or being engaged by the enemy and performing satisfactorily.

4.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 2009-15, dated
16 December 2009, awarded the 133rd Engineer Battalion the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 20 March 2004 to 27 February 2005 for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service during the period indicated.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was awarded the CAB by the appropriate authority on 
26 October 2005 for his service in Iraq during the period 2004 and 2005.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

2.  General orders awarded his unit the MUC during his period of assignment.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 April 2005 the Combat Action Badge and the Meritorious Unit Commendation.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012612



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012612



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011139

    Original file (20080011139.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The orders provided by the applicant indicate that he was awarded the CAB on 5 October 2005 for actively engaging the enemy on 1 June 2005. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to show that he was awarded the CAB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the CAB, the ARCOM, the MUC, the OSR and the Drivers Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017748

    Original file (20110017748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states he was presented the ARCOM and CAB after his release from active duty (REFRAD); as a result, the awards are not listed on his DD Form 214. Permanent orders awarded the applicant the CAB; as a result, he is authorized addition of this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 March 2008 by: a. deleting the ICM; and b. adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016010

    Original file (20060016010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member Ms. Karmin S. Jenkins Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant believes that the Commander, 1st Infantry Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, awarded him the Combat Infantryman Badge in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-22 for the types of missions conducted by his platoon in support of the various units. Orders 049-002, 1st Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, dated 18 February 2005, awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019938

    Original file (20080019938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, he is entitled to the OSR, GWOTSM, and the ICM with two bronze service stars based on his 10-month and 15-day tour of duty in Iraq and these awards should be added to his record and separation document at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 29 March 2004 DD Form 214 by adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004381

    Original file (20150004381.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 April 2011 * DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), signed 24 October 2005, regarding award of the Combat Action Badge * memorandum, dated 5 September 2005, issued by the 133rd Engineer Combat Battalion (ECB) (Heavy (H)), MEARNG, addressed to Headquarters, MEARNG, subject: Request Award of Combat Action Badge for members of 133rd ECB (H) * memorandum, dated 25 October 2005, issued by the Maine Army National Guard (MEARNG), addressed to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014752

    Original file (20090014752.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides two printouts from the internet – one discusses the Iraq Campaign Medal and states " personnel who previously received the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOTEM) for Iraq service may elect to exchange the medal for the new Iraq Campaign Medal" and the second discusses the criteria for award of the CAB. Award of the Iraq Campaign Medal is authorized for service in direct support of Operation Iraqi Freedom on or after 19 March 2003 to a future date to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011495

    Original file (20090011495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Action Badge (CAB) for his service in Afghanistan and another for his service in Iraq, Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM), Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM), and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The applicant requested, in effect, that he be awarded the CAB for his service in Afghanistan during the period 11 July 2002 to 18 January 2003. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was subsequently awarded the AGCM (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014002

    Original file (20080014002.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s records awarding him the PH, CIB, or the CAB. There is no evidence of “active” engagement with the enemy. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030062

    Original file (20100030062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he enlisted in an engineer unit of the Maine Army National Guard (MEARNG) in September 2007, with formal infantry training from his prior service in the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) * he was involuntarily assigned to an infantry unit for deployment to Afghanistan, in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), without being afforded the ability to attend 11B MOS training * he trained as an infantryman at Camp Atterbury, IN, and the Joint Readiness Training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017200

    Original file (20110017200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The case provided by the applicant’s counsel (AR2002068627) which he contends sets a precedent by the Board involves the award of the CIB to a Soldier who served as an infantryman but held another MOS through on-the job training and because he had never been school trained in any MOS and had served the majority of his time in an infantry MOS, the Board awarded the Soldier the CIB. While there is no dispute that the applicant was assigned to an infantry unit and performed infantry duties,...