Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012126
Original file (20110012126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  6 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110012126 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the last name on her military records.

2.  The applicant states she was recently divorced and wants her military records changed to show her maiden name.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a:

* Decree of Divorce
* Common Access Card
* DD Form 2 (Retired) Identification Card
* Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) letter dated 16 May 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the ABCMR to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 29 July 1987, the applicant initially enlisted in the Regular Army under the name of J_______ A______ and served until she was honorably released from active duty on 7 March 1995, under the name J______ M______.  The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows she completed 7 years, 7 months, and 9 days of active service.

3.  On 27 April 1998, she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve, under the name of J_______ M______ and continued to serve through additional periods of reenlistment or extension.  

4.  Her official military personnel file (OMPF) contains the following documents which show she served under and held five different surnames throughout her military service:

* Certificate of Achievement dated 1 August 1988
* DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) dated 8 September 1993
* DA Form 4187 dated 13 October 1998
* DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) - 16 July 2001
* DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) dated 9 April 2009

5.  The applicant's DA Form 4836, dated 9 April 2009, is her last enlistment document on file and it lists the last name she claims is incorrect.  The applicant authenticated this document with her signature by signing the same last name that she now indicates is incorrect.

6. On 3 September 2009, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency issued Orders Number D246-12 directing the applicant's release from assignment and placement on the retired list effective on 8 October 2009, by reason of permanent physical disability.  It also lists the last name the applicant now indicates is incorrect, as indicated on her final enlistment document.

7.  The applicant provides a court order issued by the District Court, Family Division, Clark County, Nevada, dated 17 February 2011.  It shows, incident to a divorce, the circuit court judge granted the applicant's restoration of her former name of J_________ A________, her maiden name.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or 

control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to correct her records to reflect her maiden name was carefully considered.  While it is understood why she would want her records changed to reflect her maiden or current legal name, the evidence of record confirms she last served in and was separated in the last name that is listed on her final separation order.

2.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed throughout a Soldier's service.  Absent any evidence that the applicant has actually suffered an injustice based on the last name recorded on her military records, there appears to be no compelling reason to compromise the integrity of the Army’s records to correct her last name at this late date.

3.  This Record of Proceedings will be filed in her OMPF in order to provide clarity and to deal with any confusion that may arise regarding her current legal name.  This document will also guarantee the historical integrity of the applicant's military records regarding the last names under which she served.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x_  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _x   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012126



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012126



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003160

    Original file (20150003160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. her DD Form 214 list the wrong name and should be corrected to reflect the name she signed on the bottom of her DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record), as P____ T____ B____; b. at the time of her discharge from the Army, she was divorced and returned to her maiden name; and c. her DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile Board Proceedings) also lists the incorrect name. The applicant provides copies of her: * Driver’s License * DD Form 214 * DA Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018762

    Original file (20100018762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in two separate applications, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her maiden name. However, her DD Form 214 must reflect her service as it existed on the date of her discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019200

    Original file (20140019200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant provides evidence of a divorce, it occurred after her retirement from service (emphasis added). __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019200 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019200 2 ARMY BOARD FOR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001605

    Original file (20110001605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of the last name on her military records. While it is understood why she would want her records changed to reflect her maiden or current legal name, the evidence of record confirms she served in and was separated in the last name that is listed on her ERB, DD Form 214, and all other documents that were filed in her OMPF subsequent to 18 June 2003, the date of her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005993

    Original file (20080005993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The military documents that are on file in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File show that the applicant served under the last name of J****** until sometime in 1984 and then served under the name of W******* up until her release from active duty in 1985. There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, which would indicate that an injustice will occur if her last name is not changed on her DD Form 214 as requested. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002247

    Original file (20090002247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, it is concluded that the document provided by the applicant is insufficient to warrant a change to the name recorded in her military service records and on her discharge document. In this regard, the evidence of record shows that the applicant’s military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005295

    Original file (20110005295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 14 June 2006 * A Physical Disability Information Report CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Her record contains a DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 26 October 2005, which shows her last name as C---s. 6. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110005295 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016873

    Original file (20090016873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 14 September 2001, shows in item 2 (Name - Last, First, Middle Name, (and Maiden, if any), Jr., Sr., etc.) the applicant's name is recorded as "H------, K------- R--." In this regard, the evidence of record shows that the applicant's military service records reflect the correct name (at the time) under which military service was performed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021704

    Original file (20120021704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021704 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. She states, in effect, she is divorced and she would like her retirement DD Form 214 to reflect her maiden name. Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows she enlisted using her maiden name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025925

    Original file (20100025925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married name. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her maiden name and the approved official name changes that she requested throughout her military service. Records also show that, from that point on, her last name (i.e., "J-----n") is consistently recorded in her official military service records, including her DD Form 214, when she retired from active duty on 30 September 2009.