Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011953
Original file (20110011953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011953 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH) and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

2.  The applicant states he should have received the CIB based on five separate enemy live-fire incidents.  He contends that four of these incidents occurred in Dak To, RVN; once during a bombing of the air strip, twice while on guard duty, and once when he was a forward observer during an alleged overrun threat.

3.  The applicant further contends he was wounded during the overrun threat wherein he received shrapnel in his left arm pit.  He was also wounded twice while on guard duty; once by a poorly searched prisoner of war (POW) who cut his left arm and when he attempted to save the life of a POW from a fire into which he had jumped.

4.  The applicant also contends that he did not receive the PH or the CIB because his first sergeant (1SG) did not care for him.  The 1SG told him to put a band aid on his wounds and that he would never get a CIB; however, the 1SG got one for sleeping on his bunk.

5.  The applicant provides his DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 30 January 1969 and
14 February 19673.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 7 October 1966, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 3 years.  His available records do not indicate what military occupational specialty (MOS) he was initially awarded.

3.  On 14 April 1967, he was reassigned for duty in the RVN.  His initial unit of assignment is not in the available records.

4.  On 30 January 1969, during his tour in the RVN, he reenlisted in the RA.  The DD Form 214 he was issued for his first term of service shows in:

* item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) the entry Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 173rd Airborne Brigade
* item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) the entry 64A1P (Light Vehicle Driver) [the "P" indicates parachutist qualification]
* Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Parachutist Badge
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Vietnam Service Medal
* overseas service bar

5.  The applicant continued to serve in the RVN until 14 June 1969.

6.  During the period 16 April 1970 to 13 October 1971, the applicant served in Okinawa.  His duty MOS is indicated as 96B (Intelligence Analyst).  His 


assignment was with the 1st Special Forces Group (Airborne), 1st Special Forces.  He was subsequently assigned to Fort Bragg, NC.

7.  On 14 February 1973, the applicant was honorably discharged at the expiration of his term of service.  He had attained the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5.  He completed 6 years, 3 months, and 23 days of total active service.

8.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the:

* Parachutist Badge
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar
(.45 Caliber)
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)

9.  The applicant's available record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that was prepared on 8 October 1971 and last reviewed by the applicant on 10 January 1972.  Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show the PH or CIB as authorized awards.

10.  Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name.

11.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the PH or the CIB pertaining to the applicant.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the:

	a.  PH to a member of the Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed, or who has died or may die after being wounded in any action against an enemy of the U.S.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record, and


	b.  Combat Infantryman Badge to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

13.  U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1, appendix V, states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should have been awarded the PH and CIB for his service in the RVN.

2.  There are no available orders showing the applicant was awarded the PH.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing and there is no PH order for him on ADCARDS.  Item 40 of his DA Form 20 further does not show a record of any wounds received in action.

3.  The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size while assigned in the RVN.  However, it does not show he ever held an infantryman MOS or that had engaged in active ground combat with his infantry unit.  There is also no CIB order for him on ADCARS.

4.  There is also no evidence of record, nor has the applicant provided any evidence that shows deliberate action was taken by any of his superiors, including his 1SG, to deny him either the PH or the CIB.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011953



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011953



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029650

    Original file (20100029650.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100029650 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving on active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant held an infantry MOS, was assigned to the 2nd Squadron of the 17th Cavalry Regiment, and received the PH for wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020156

    Original file (20120020156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded or authorized the following: * Purple Heart (PH) (2nd Award) * gold star on Parachute Wings for jumps under fire (properly known as the bronze service star to be worn on the Parachutist Badge to denote a combat parachute jump) * senior Parachute Wings (properly known as Senior Parachutist Badge) * Air Medal (AM) * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050011071

    Original file (20050011071.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he received a fragment wound while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) that entitles him to the PH, and that he should have been awarded the CIB based on his combat experience. The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he served in the RVN from 30 April 1970 through 14 June 1970. Absent any evidence (PH awards orders, eye-witness statements, medical treatment documents confirming his foot wound was combat related etc),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081751C070215

    Original file (2002081751C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board notes the applicant’s claim of entitlement to the PH, CIB, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. Therefore, the Board finds no basis for awarding him the CIB at this time. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 1 June 1965 through 31 May 1968; by showing that his RVN service entitles him to the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005684

    Original file (20110005684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which shows: * in item 27 (Military Education) – no entry * in item 28 (Specialized Training) – * Army Training Program (ATP) 21-114 [Basic Combat Training] * Code of Conduct * Basic Airborne Course * Chemical/Biological/Radiological (CBR) training * in item 38 (Record of Assignments) – conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" * in item 40 (Wounds) – gunshot wound right arm 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004826

    Original file (20090004826.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards: NDSM, RVN Campaign Medal, VSM, CIB, and BSM with "V" Device. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 5 October 1966 through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000126C070206

    Original file (20050000126C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 August 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050000126 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The DD Form 214 he was issued upon his separation shows, in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), that he earned the NDSM. The applicant’s DA Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018796

    Original file (20080018796.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080018796 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 30 October 1967 through 7 July 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 22 May 1968; b. awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069889C070402

    Original file (2002069889C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any award recommendations, orders, or other documents that would indicate the applicant was recommended for, awarded, or entitled to receive the CIB, PH, BSM, or SS. The Parachutist Badge, CIB, PH, BSM, and SS were not included in this list of authorized awards included in the separation document. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant successfully completed the basic airborne course, and as a result was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021914

    Original file (20100021914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of the DA Form 20 is blank and the PH and CIB are not included among the list of awards shown in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). His record is void of any orders or other documents that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty, and there are no medical treatment records on file that show he was ever treated for a combat related wound or injury as a result of enemy action. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...