Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011846
Original file (20110011846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011846 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states he was on a combat patrol in Cambodia while he was assigned to Company E, 3rd Battalion, 22nd Infantry, 25th Infantry Division, when they were ambushed by small arms and rocket-propelled grenades on 30 May 1970.  The platoon suffered several casualties and he was wounded in the right leg and thigh, received medical treatment in the field, and continued with the mission because they were very short of personnel.  He was told he would receive the Purple Heart, but he never received orders.  He left Vietnam shortly thereafter and tried to forget about that terrible day.

3.  He further states that for the past 40 years he just felt lucky to be alive and tried to forget the incident.  He recently visited the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, DC, and saw the names of his fellow Soldiers who were killed that day causing him to relive that event.  He has the Purple Heart medal but does not have orders.  He was able to contact one of the Soldiers involved in the ambush who has written a statement which he attached to this request.

4.  He provides a statement from a fellow Soldier.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 February 1969.  He completed training and was awarded the military occupational specialty of infantryman.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to various infantryman duty positions while serving a tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam from 2 August 1969 to 27 July 1970.

4.  His records do not contain any evidence that indicate he was ever awarded the Purple Heart.

5.  He was honorably retired from active duty on 28 February 1993.

6.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medal, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 February 1993 does not list the Purple Heart.

7.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 is blank and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not list the Purple Heart.

8.  The Vietnam casualty list does not contain his name.

9.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for award of the Purple Heart pertaining to him.

10.  He provides a statement from a fellow Soldier wherein the individual stated the applicant was with his unit in Cambodia on 30 May 1970 when it was hit by rocket-propelled grenades.  He could not remember the applicant being wounded, but he contacted another Soldier, R____ W____, who told him the applicant was his machine gunner on his Jeep.  The applicant and R____ W____ deserve a Silver Star for their heroism on that day.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was wounded in the right leg and thigh when his platoon was ambushed by small arms and rocket-propelled grenades and he received medical treatment in the field.  However, notwithstanding the fellow Soldier's statement provided by the applicant, there is no evidence in his available military personnel records or sufficient corroborating evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action, treated for such a wound, or that it was made a matter of official record.

2.  There were no orders for award of the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant found in a review of ADCARS.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty list.

3.  In the absence of evidence that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for such wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.  As a result, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011846



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011846



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019060

    Original file (20130019060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His Official Military Personnel File does not contain any documentation indicating he was wounded in action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. A supporting statement from a former Soldier (name illegible), dated 17 June 2011, shows the former Soldier stated he served in the applicant's squad.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020389

    Original file (20090020389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant’s service personnel records. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence which shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence in which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010594

    Original file (20120010594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. a letter from his mother who states the applicant has never been the same since returning from his service in Vietnam. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. Although...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019343

    Original file (20140019343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. (3) Thus, these three statements (that do not show any evidence of being eyewitness statements) provide insufficient evidence to support a claim to the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002864

    Original file (20090002864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Even the applicant's former first sergeant only stated that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004878

    Original file (20120004878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). During his tour of duty in Vietnam he was assigned to: * Company D, 14th Engineer Battalion from 21 November 1969 through 3 August 1971 as a loader operator * Company D, 27th Engineer Battalion from 4 August through 9 November 1971 as a loader operator 4. He completed 2 years and 7 months of total active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004887

    Original file (20110004887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The former fellow Soldier stated: * a rocket penetrated the bunker in the applicant's sleeping area * the applicant was not seriously injured in the attack * he assessed the applicant's injuries and determined he didn't need medical care beyond his own medical treatment and bandaging * he failed to complete a Field Medical Card for the applicant's injuries * he provided a copy of his own DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021210

    Original file (20090021210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant’s service personnel records. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the radiology reports provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002025

    Original file (20130002025.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 13173 and certificate for award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006035

    Original file (20080006035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis...