Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011714
Original file (20110011714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  17 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011714 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to remove any reference to time lost due to being absent without leave (AWOL) and that lost time be made good.

2.  The applicant states he was court-martialed in 1976 and he received a bad conduct discharge (BCD), reduction in rank, and forfeiture of pay and allowances.  However, at the commander's request, the BCD was remitted and he served honorably until 27 December 2007.  He contends he was never made aware that his periods of AWOL, even 2 days, negate an entire year of creditable service.  He feels it was a grave injustice not to make an accused aware of the possible punishment if convicted and this injustice has adversely affected his retirement date as a consequence.  In effect, he has been denied his right to a just retirement having served only 19 years and 3 months of creditable service.

3.  Further, his record will demonstrate that after his confinement he was an important and vital asset to our national defense serving in some of the most sensitive positions in the U.S. Army having been detailed to most of our national intelligence agencies and serving in classified positions.

4.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings).



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 15 October 1974.  He was honorably released from active duty on 17 February 1978 and transferred to a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit.  He was credited with 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active Federal service.

3.  Item 27 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 17 February 1978 lists 127 days of lost time under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972, as follows:

* 2 February 1976-4 February 1976 [AWOL]
* 1 March 1976-19 April 1976 [AWOL]
* 9 August 1976-21 October 1976 [imprisonment]

4.  On 27 December 2007, he was honorably discharged from the USAR by reason of disability with severance pay.

5.  His USAR Personnel Command Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 16 August 2011, shows he has a total of 19 years, 3 months, and 11 days of qualifying years for retirement.  This document also lists the same periods of lost time as shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 17 February 1978.  He did not receive qualifying retirement points during his 127 days of lost time, but he did receive creditable points within that same year.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It directs that the dates of lost time during the current enlistment will be entered on the DD Form 214.  Lost time under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972, is not creditable service for pay, retirement, or veterans' benefits; however, the Army preserves a record of lost time to explain which service between the date of entry on active duty and the separation date is creditable service for benefits.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972, states that enlisted Soldiers are required to make up for lost time.  A Soldier who is returned to military duty after a period of being absent from his unit for more than 1 day without proper authority or who deserts is required to serve for a period that, when added to the period that he served before his absence from duty, amounts to the term for which he was enlisted or inducted.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to remove any reference to lost time due to being AWOL and that the lost time be made good for retirement purposes.

2.  The evidence shows he had 127 days of lost time due to AWOL and imprisonment.  His contention that he only recently came to understand that his lost time would not be creditable for retirement purposes is not reasonable because his Chronological Statement of Retirement Points clearly shows he did not receive credit toward retirement for his lost time.  Further, it is doubtful that during his military career he never reviewed a copy of this document prior to his separation.

3.  His service after confinement is noteworthy; however, there is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that his lost time was in error.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011714



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011714



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000239

    Original file (20090000239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed 4 years of total active service instead of 2 years, 9 months, and 4 days, as currently shown. However, he was discharged on 10 September 1969 and was credited with 2 years, 9 months, and 4 days of active service. The period of service from 5 January 1966 (erroneously shown as 1965 on his reissued DD Form 214) to 10 September 1969 equals 3 years, 8 months, and 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003227

    Original file (20090003227.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty in the RA this period on 14 April 1978 and was honorably retired from active duty on 31 March 1994 based on sufficient service for retirement. The evidence of record further shows that these two periods of inactive and active service are accurately documented on the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 18 March 1971. As a result, the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003099

    Original file (20140003099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 March 1975, the applicant was advised in writing of being recommended for elimination from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations – Discharge – Misconduct) due to his conviction by civil authorities on the charge of robbery. Item 44 (Time Lost Under Section 972, Title 10, U.S. Code (USC) and Subsequent to Normal Date of Expiration of Term of Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: * AWOL – 11 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002065

    Original file (20070002065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 1 day of lost time and rank be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 1 November 1979. The applicant's records contain a DD Form 214 which shows he was separated from active duty on 11 January 1979, for the purpose of retirement. Evidence of record shows that the applicant's was retired from active duty on 11 January 1979 and placed on the TDRL effective 12 January 1979 with a 30 percent disability rating in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011461

    Original file (20100011461.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 21 December 1978, in the pay grade of E-1, under other than honorable conditions, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service – in lieu of trial by court-martial. A review of the applicant's records does not show that he served any time in the Army after his discharge on 21 December 1978. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015892

    Original file (20140015892.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 June 1975, the applicant was given an order from his commanding officer to proceed to a site at Fort Bragg and remain there until 8 June 1975. The military vehicle in which he returned to the barracks from the field site had been found abandoned about 30 miles from Fort Bragg. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 19 August 1976.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000443

    Original file (20090000443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he completed 18 years of total active service. The applicant’s military personnel records contain a DD Form 4 that shows he reenlisted in the U.S. Army for a period of 4 years on 10 March 1978. The applicant’s military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty in the RA this period on 10 March 1978 and was honorably discharged based on physical disability with severance pay on 29 November 1990.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071194C070402

    Original file (2002071194C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Order Number 127 ordered applicant’s discharge, effective the following day, citing the authority of GCM Order Number 68, which was the 11 November 1974 order issued by Fort Campbell, Kentucky promulgating the results of applicant’s general court-martial. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001959

    Original file (20070001959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that this correction resulted in the applicant being credited with 2 additional days of active service based on his active duty training service during the period 23 – 24 April 1977. Thus, the applicant provides evidence to substantiate his claim that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 1991, does not reflect credit for the 2 days of active duty training during the period 23 – 24 April 1977. However, the applicant’s DD Form 214, with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008654

    Original file (20110008654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved