Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011661
Original file (20110011661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011661 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her undesirable discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable.

2.  The applicant states she has not been charged with any felonies or caused a violation against the U.S. Government since her discharge.  She is applying for the upgrade in order to apply for veteran's benefits because she is unemployed and medically disabled.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), and a Certificate of Achievement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  Her military records were requested from the National Personnel Records Center; however, they could not be located.  This request is being considered based on the documents provided by her.

3.  Her DD Form 214 shows she enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 July 1985 and was awarded military occupational specialty 76V (Materiel Storage and Handling Specialist).

4.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of her DA Form 2-1 shows she was promoted to the rank of sergeant/E-5 on 1 February 1989 and she was reduced to the rank of specialist/E-4 on 3 August 1992.

5.  Her DD Form 214 shows she was discharged on 13 July 1993, in the rank of private/E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, with her service characterized as under other than honorable conditions.  Her DD Form 214 also shows she was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of JFS (for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial).

6.  There is no evidence indicating she applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of her discharge.

7.  She provides a Certificate of Achievement which she was awarded on 
1 December 1986 for exceptionally meritorious achievement during the period 
4 October - 8 November 1986.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel and states in:

	a.  Chapter 10, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a, an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	c.  Paragraph 3-7b, a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The ABCMR does not upgrade discharges for the sole purpose of enabling an individual to apply and/or qualify for veteran's benefits.

2.  Although her record is void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding her discharge, her DD Form 214 confirms she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.  It appears she was charged with the commission of an offense(s) punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice which could have resulted in a punitive discharge.  Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, are voluntary requests and she is presumed to have willingly and in writing requested discharge from the Army to avoid trial by court-martial.  In doing so, she would have admitted guilt and waived her opportunity to appear before a court-martial.  It is also presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met and her rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.

3.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011661



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011661



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002707

    Original file (20080002707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's separation "packet" is not available in her service personnel record; however, the applicant's service personnel record contains a completed DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, that was signed by the applicant at the time of her discharge. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of her discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The evidence shows the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008356

    Original file (20130008356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 January 1990, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. Her DD Form 214 shows she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009855

    Original file (20090009855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 October 1988, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed that she be furnished an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 3 November 1988 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010749

    Original file (20110010749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 14 August 2009, the ADRB denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of her discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001572

    Original file (20090001572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 March 1999, after carefully considering the applicant’s application, her military records, and all other available evidence, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) determined the applicant’s characterization of service and the reason for discharge were proper and equitable, and voted not to change either the characterization of service or the reason for discharge. Chapter 10 provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006553

    Original file (20090006553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 confirms that on 28 February 2003 she was discharged in the rank of private/E-1 under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), in lieu of trial by court-martial and that she received a UOTHC discharge. Chapter 10 provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007588

    Original file (20080007588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In her request for discharge, the applicant indicated that she understood that by requesting discharge, she was admitting guilt to the charges against her, or of a lesser included offense, that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a discharge under other honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows she was discharged for the good of the service with a characterization of service of Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014860

    Original file (20140014860 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no available evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of her discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations 11. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012709

    Original file (20060012709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. She had completed 2 years, 7 months, and 6 days of active military service during the period under review. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error injustice to this Board expired on 9 December 1999.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001559

    Original file (20090001559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    [She encloses her high school transcript to substantiate this claim.] The high school transcript submitted by the applicant shows that she made straight D's in math classes and that she graduated 15th in a class of 18. Although the discharge documentation is not of record, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.