Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011539
Original file (20110011539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011539 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states he sustained a gunshot wound to his right arm while serving in Vietnam.  He was awarded a service-connected disability rating from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and receives medical treatment as a result of this wound.

3.  He provides a certified copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a VA Rating Decision letter, dated 25 October 2010.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 


has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 27 January 1966.  He completed training and he was awarded and served in military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

* he served in Vietnam from 1 December 1966 through 30 November 1967
* in Item 40 (Wounds) no entry (blank)
* in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for the Purple Heart

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 24 November 1967 as an overseas returnee.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show award of the Purple Heart.

5.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty listing.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

7.  His military medical records are not available for review.  However, the applicant provided a copy of a VA Decision Rating letter, dated 25 October 2010.  This letter shows, in part, he received a 20 percent (%) disability rating percentage for a gunshot wound to the right forearm which occurred during the Vietnam Era.  This document does not show the cause of the gunshot wound or that it was incurred as a result of hostile action.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required medical treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His request for award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the available evidence.

2.  Although the VA awarded him a service-connected disability for the gunshot wound to his right forearm, his record contains no evidence and he has not provided sufficient evidence to show that the wound was a result of hostile action.  

3.  Should the applicant obtain a copy of his military medical records or other corroborating evidence to show he was injured as a result of hostile action, he received medical treatment for his injuries, and the medical treatment was made a matter of record, he can use that documentation as new evidence to resubmit his request.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011539



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011539



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006921

    Original file (20120006921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Both certificates show he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 29 December 1967 in Vietnam. Individuals who qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal for less than 6 months of service but were wounded as a result of hostile action are also entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007070

    Original file (20130007070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. In the absence of orders or any other documents verifying he was wounded as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020541

    Original file (20120020541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. His available service medical records show he listed a shrapnel wound in December 1969 and the military medical doctor found evidence of a scar on his right forearm. In the absence of orders or other additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001047

    Original file (20150001047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show he sustained an injury on 25 October 1967 and was awarded the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's request for correction of his military service records to show he sustained wounds/injuries on 25 October 1967 and was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017857

    Original file (20130017857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was combat wounded in Vietnam * during a firefight in the jungles of Vietnam he sustained shrapnel wounds in the left forearm and left side of his head 3. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021132

    Original file (20120021132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the son of a former service member (FSM), requests his father be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on or about 8 November “1968” in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available records which show the FSM was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is insufficient evidence in the available record that shows the FSM was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000834

    Original file (20120000834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The available evidence shows the VA granted the applicant service connection for a knee condition, gunshot wound to his left forearm, and a tonsillectomy. In the absence of sufficient evidence of record which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis upon which to award him the Purple Heart or to correct his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show he was wounded in his left forearm.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017092

    Original file (20080017092.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 25 (Selected Administrative Data) of this form shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart by 12th Evacuation Hospital, General Order 234, dated 6 October 1968. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018043

    Original file (20100018043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded while serving in Vietnam, but he was not awarded the Purple Heart. In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish that the wound for which the award is being made required treatment by medical personnel and the medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action must have been made a matter of official record. The evidence of record shows the executive officer of the applicant's former unit in Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020198

    Original file (20110020198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete medical records were not available for review. In the absence of official documentary evidence to corroborate the events that led to his injury, or additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to award him the Purple Heart in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110020198 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF...