Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011347
Original file (20110011347.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011347 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge.

2.  He states:

* his unit was involved in the killing of innocent kids and babies during the Gulf War
* he had nightmares for 15 years and they started again during the summer of 2010

3.  He provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-526 (Veteran's Application for Compensation and/or Pension), and VA Form 21-4142 (Authorization and Consent to Release Information to the VA).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After completion of prior active and inactive service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 June 1987.  

3.  His service record contains a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 4 April 1990, which shows he received an Article 15 on 3 April 1990 and was reduced from E-4 to E-3.

4.  He served in Southwest Asia from 28 August 1990 to 24 March 1991.  

5.  Item 21 (Time Lost (Section 972, Title 10, U.S. Code)) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows he was absent without leave (AWOL) from 17 May to 16 June 1991.  

6.  His service record contains DA Forms 4187-E which show he was AWOL during the periods:

* 17 to 23 May 1991
* 24 May to 15 June 1991 
* 24 June to 30 July 1991

7.  His discharge packet is not available for review.  His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 3 September 1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service – in lieu of court-martial with issuance of a UOTHC discharge.  He completed 4 years and 5 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 also shows periods of time lost from 17 through 22 May 1991; 24 May through 13 June 1991; and 24 June through 29 July 1991 (62 days).  

8.  His service record doesn’t indicate he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations.  

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  

   a.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge UOTHC is normally considered appropriate.

   b.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

   c.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions regarding his experiences during the Gulf War and since that time are acknowledged.  While the Board is empathetic, these issues are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge. 

2.  Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, require an admission of guilt to the offense(s) charges and the requests are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.  As such, government regularity insofar as the discharge process must be presumed.  It is presumed all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Further, it appears the applicant’s discharge reflects his overall record of military service.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to either a general or an honorable discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011347





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011347



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005747

    Original file (20080005747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). During its original review of the case, the Board concluded the applicant's discharge was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations, and that the characterization of his service was commensurate with his overall record of service. The record does contain a separation document (DD Form 214), which identifies the authority and reason for his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007828

    Original file (20140007828.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * Air Assault Badge * Combat Lifesaver Course * Korean Language Course * Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) * Persian Gulf War participation * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) or Combat Action Badge (CAB) * Name change from "K_____ L______ H____" to "J____ A__" 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010932

    Original file (20120010932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120010932 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010916

    Original file (20130010916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the official military personnel file (OMPF), is void of a separation packet containing the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his separation processing. However, his record contains a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012879

    Original file (20110012879.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: a. He submitted a DA Form 4187, dated 8 November 1991, which shows his grade as CPL and his MOS as 63T1O. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as CPL at the time of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002912

    Original file (20120002912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his service in Southwest Asia (SWA) and awards he is authorized as a result of his service in SWA. His DD Form 214 does not reflect his service in SWA or awards authorized for service in SWA during the period 16 February to 12 April 1991. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007941

    Original file (20120007941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * His entry and separation dates as 13 April 1989 to 18 February 1991 instead of 13 April 1990 to 18 February 1992 * In effect, his service in Southwest Asia in support of Operations Desert Shield/Storm 2. With respect to the entry and separation dates, the evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 April 1990 and he was honorably discharged on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014086

    Original file (20100014086.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, deployment orders, Deployment Environmental Surveillance Program Internet document extract, and an undated memorandum, subject: Certification of Operation Desert Storm Participation. It indicates the applicant participated in Desert Storm from 28 September 1990 to 3 April 1991 while assigned to Service Battery, 5th Battalion, 18th Field Artillery...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017464

    Original file (20100017464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to upgrade his Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge to an Honorable Discharge. He provides copies of the following documentation in support of his request: * A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) * Two certificates * A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) * A DD Form 458 * An excerpt of his separation packet under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021370

    Original file (20130021370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the: a. Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who participated in Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm in the designated area on or after 2 August 1990 to 30 November 1995. The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in SWA from 18 October 1990 to 8 April 1991; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his foreign service and the dates of his service in...