Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011210
Original file (20110011210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011210 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States to show his most significant duty assignment as Company I, 65th Infantry Regiment.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 should show he was assigned to I Company, 65th Infantry Regiment.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service member's records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the DD Form 214 provided by the applicant is sufficient to conduct a fair and impartial review of this specific request.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows:

	a.  he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 22 September 1950;

	b.  he served in the Republic of Korea;

	c.  he received the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Korean Service Medal with three bronze service stars;

	d.  he was assigned to Company K, 65th Infantry Regiment;

	e.  he attained the rank of sergeant first class;

	f.  he was released from active duty on 24 June 1952 and transferred to the Enlisted Reserve Component; and

	g.  he completed 1 year, 9 months and 3 days of creditable active duty service.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as in effect at the time, required an entry in Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his most significant duty assignment as Company I, 65th Infantry Regiment.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  Therefore, his assignment history is not available for review.  Furthermore, there is no evidence showing he had not been assigned to Company K before or after an assignment to Company I.  Accordingly, a determination cannot be made without additional documentary evidence.

3.  If the applicant has, or can obtain supporting documentation, such as correspondence, unit morning reports, etc; then he may submit another application for consideration.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011210





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011210



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002111

    Original file (20120002111.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his most significant duty assignment was with Company I instead of Company K, 65th Infantry Regiment. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Nevertheless, although there is no evidence of record he was actually assigned to Company K, 65th Infantry Regiment there is evidence he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018994

    Original file (20100018994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence he submits also shows that after he enlisted in the RA, he was assigned to Company C, 296th Infantry, at least as of the date of his separation in December 1951. ___________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015008

    Original file (20080015008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 27 September 1953 be corrected to show the 65th Combat Engineer Battalion, 25th Infantry Division. This DD Form 214 does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge as an authorized award. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020440

    Original file (20140020440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This order awarded him the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for heroic achievement in connection with military operations against an enemy of the United States while serving as an infantryman with Company M, 65th Infantry, 3d Infantry Division, on 3 October 1951 in an assault upon enemy positions near Chorwon, Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge for actions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010114

    Original file (20120010114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 December 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120010114 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013242

    Original file (20080013242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show he was assigned to the 187th Airborne Regimental Combat Team Support Company and the 3rd Infantry Division, 15th Regiment. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to Company K, 86th Infantry Regiment, 10th Infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018542

    Original file (20080018542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. He also requests that item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) on his DD Form 214 be corrected to show Company G, 35th Infantry Regiment, 25th Infantry Division instead of the unit he served with after returning stateside....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051784C070420

    Original file (2001051784C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The 3d Infantry Division commander also opted not to take any action against the officers and men of the 15th Infantry when a patrol from that regiment refused to follow its commander to the still hotly-contested position at Jackson Heights in November 1952. The applicant was the commander of the 2d Battalion, 65 th Infantry Regiment. No action was taken by the 3d Infantry Division commander against the officers and men of the 15 th Infantry when a patrol from that regiment refused to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000164

    Original file (20120000164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * His DD Form 214 * A letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 19 December 2011 * A copy of an envelope * Orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed 1 year, 1 month, and 9 days of foreign service and his most significant duty assignment was with the 65th Engineer Combat Battalion, Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001361

    Original file (20110001361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show the 2nd Combat Engineer Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, 2nd Infantry Division. The applicant states: * He served with the 2nd Combat Engineer Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, of the 2nd Infantry Division not Company B, 20th Engineer Combat Battalion * His claim for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder was denied because of...