Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011155
Original file (20110011155.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    13 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011155 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  He states Major T____ of the 20th Transportation Detachment informed him that he was awarded the BSM for his action on 8 January 1967 in Pleiku, Vietnam.  The BSM is not listed on his DD Form 214 and he never received this award.

3.  He provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His records show he was appointed as a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 31 May 1963.  After completion of training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 2136 (Non-Tactical Unit Officer).

3.  His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows the following information:

* item 17 (Foreign Service) – he served in Vietnam from 28 September 1966 through 22 April 1967
* item 18 (Record of Assignments) – he was assigned to the 512th, 520th, and 5th Transportation Companies during his tour in Vietnam
* item 21 (Awards and Decorations) – does not include the BSM

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 1 May 1967 and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) for completion of his Reserve service obligation.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show award of the BSM.

5.  A review of his records did not reveal any documentation to show he was recommended for or awarded the BSM.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the BSM.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service not involving participation in aerial flight in connection with military operations against an armed enemy or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His request for correction of his DD Form 214 to add the BSM was carefully considered.

2.  There is no evidence of record to show he was recommended for or awarded the BSM and he has not provided sufficient evidence to show his entitlement to the BSM.

3.  Should he obtain a copy of official orders or documentation showing he was recommended for or awarded the BSM, he can use that documentation as new evidence to resubmit his request.

4.  In the absence of such evidence; there is an insufficient basis on which to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X__________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011155



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011155



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010872

    Original file (20100010872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) instead of the Vietnam Campaign Medal, two awards of the Overseas Service Bar, Good Conduct Medal, Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant states: * He was awarded the BSM, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), two awards of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025082

    Original file (20110025082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence clearly shows the applicant served more than 6 months, but the overseas service bar is not an award or decoration; therefore he is not entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show award of the Overseas...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012546

    Original file (20100012546.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart (PH) and two Bronze Star Medals (BSM) he received during his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006985

    Original file (20090006985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 of the record copy of the FSM's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41. The applicant provided a copy of page 4 of the FSM's DA Form 20 showing the FSM was awarded the PH and the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026426

    Original file (20100026426.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar, Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, Army Good Conduct Medal, Meritorious Unit Commendation, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Gold Star Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003385

    Original file (20110003385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. General Orders Number 404, issued by Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division, dated 21 January 1967, awarded him the BSM for meritorious service during the period 4 to 21 November 1966. d. On 1 March 1967, the applicant departed the RVN for duty at Fort Hood, TX. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003027

    Original file (20090003027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the PH on 10 May 1968; three Army Commendation (ARCOM) medals with "V" (Valor) Device for heroism on 31 January, 9 May, and 16 August 1968; and the BSM on 17 November 1968. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 9 May 1968, as evidenced by an entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20, the ARCOM with "V" Device orders for 9 May 1968 on file in his OMPF, an entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, and by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022297

    Original file (20100022297.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and any other awards to which he is entitled. The evidence supports correcting the applicant's record to show he received the BSM with "V" Device, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, AGCM, VSM with four bronze service stars, Aircraft Crewman Badge, and Expert...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005599

    Original file (20110005599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device and Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device. Based on his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012330

    Original file (20080012330.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records which show the applicant was disqualified for this award. Evidence of record shows that the applicant participated in 3 campaigns during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the already-awarded Purple Heart and ARCOM with "V" Device to his DD Form 214; b. awarding the AGCM (First Award) for the qualifying period of 7 June 1966...