Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010384
Original file (20110010384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010384 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge for medical reasons.

2.  The applicant states he was discharged from the military for medical reasons. 
He suffers from medical problems due to mustard gas exposure and has been denied disability compensation due to the character of his discharge.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Department of Veterans Affairs Rating Decision and a notice of disagreement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Kansas City, Missouri, on 19 May 1993 for a period of 3 years and training as an infantryman.  He was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia, to undergo his one-station unit training (OSUT) as a fighting vehicle infantryman.

3.  On 21 September 1993, he was convicted by a summary court-martial of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 2 to 8 September 1993.

4.  He completed OSUT and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas, on 10 November 1993.

5.  On 18 August 1994, he was AWOL and remained absent in desertion until he was returned to military control at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, on 10 October 1994.  He was transferred to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offense.

6.  On 17 October 1994 after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10.  He indicated he was making the request of his own free will without coercion from anyone and he was aware of the implications attached to his request.  He also admitted he was guilty of the charge against him or of a lesser-included offense which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge.  He acknowledged he understood he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions and he might be deprived of all benefits as a result of such a discharge.  He further declined to submit a statement or explanation in his own behalf.

7.  The appropriate authority approved his request for discharge on 4 November 1994 and directed his discharge under other than honorable conditions.

8.  On 29 November 1994, he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with an under other than honorable conditions character of service.  He completed 1 year, 4 months, and 20 days of active service and accrued 64 days of lost time due to AWOL.

9.  There is no evidence in the available records to show he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 
15-year statute of limitations.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial at any time after charges have been preferred.  A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against him or her or of a lesser-included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and he or she must indicate he or she has been briefed and understands the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge he or she might receive.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

12.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's voluntary request for discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.  Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons were appropriate under the circumstances.

2.  After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his record.  In doing so he admitted guilt to the charge against him.

3.  The applicant's contentions and supporting documents have been noted; however, there is no evidence of record and he provides none to show he was discharged or was being discharged for medical reasons.  His service simply did not rise to the level of an honorable or a general discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010384



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010384



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019500

    Original file (20080019500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate authority approved his request on 6 December 1989 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. Paragraph 3-7b of Army Regulation 635-200 provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. _______XXX_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011094

    Original file (20120011094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of several documents from his military service records in support of his application. The applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003812C070206

    Original file (20050003812C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011664

    Original file (20110011664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He was transferred to Fort Knox, Kentucky, where charges were preferred against him on 30 June 1994 for being AWOL from 9 March 1993 to 27 June 1994 (475 days).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018641

    Original file (20100018641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge. The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request on 24 June 1983 and directed that the applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000492

    Original file (20100000492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. On 21 June 1994, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that he be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Furthermore, the evidence of record shows the applicant had a period of AWOL in August/September 1993, well before the March 1994 accident 5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018370

    Original file (20130018370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. The available evidence shows his chain of command recommended his discharge from the Army for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. b. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020598

    Original file (20090020598 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020888

    Original file (20100020888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge. The applicant provides the following documents: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * A self-authored personal biography * Two letters of recommendation COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000200C070206

    Original file (20050000200C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the lost time recorded in item 29 of his report of separation (DD Form 214) be removed. Accordingly, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that the lost time recorded on his records is in error. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 31 August 1994; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error...