Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010290
Original file (20110010290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  3 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010290 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states he served in Vietnam with a transportation unit; however, his DD Form 214 does not reflect his Vietnam service.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and a page from his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records, though somewhat incomplete, show he was inducted into the Army of the United States in Buffalo, NY, on 7 July 1969.  He completed basic training at Fort Jackson, SC, and advanced individual training as a unit supply specialist at Fort Lee, VA, before receiving orders for assignment to Vietnam.

3.  It appears the applicant lost his records between the time he departed Vietnam and reported to his new duty station at Fort Ord, CA.  However, it appears he was transferred to Vietnam in December 1969 and was assigned to the 20th Transportation Company.

4.  Documents contained in his records show he was advanced to pay grade E-4 on 23 July 1970 and nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him at Cu Chi Base Camp on 21 September 1970.

5.  He departed Vietnam in December 1970 and he was transferred to Fort Ord where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on temporary records on 20 July 1971.  He completed 2 years and 4 days of active service.

6.  Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects the entry "00  00  00," indicating no foreign service or any service in Vietnam.  Additionally, item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Medals Awarded or Authorized) reflects no awards for his service in Vietnam.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.  It states that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following three campaigns:

* Vietnam Winter - Spring 1970 (1 November 1969 - 30 April 1970)
* Sanctuary Counteroffensive (1 May - 30 June 1970)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970 - 30 June 1971)

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 20th Transportation Company, the unit to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the:

* Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 1 November 1968 through 31 January 1970 by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 51, dated 1971
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 September 1968 through 30 September 19780 by DAGO Number 5, dated 1973
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 1 August 1967 through 21 January 1970 by DAGO  Number 51, dated 1971

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the
DD Form 214.  It states for:

	a.  item 22c, enter the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DA Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed, e.g., "Foreign and/or Sea Service (USARV) [U.S. Army, Vietnam]."

	b.  item 24, enter all decorations, service medals, campaign credits, and badges awarded or authorized, omitting authorities cited therein,

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the exact dates the applicant served in Vietnam cannot be determined with any degree of certainty, it appears he served in Vietnam from December 1969 to December 1970.

2.  Accordingly, item 22c of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he served 1 year of foreign service in Vietnam from December 1969 to December 1970.
3.  Additionally, based on his service in Vietnam he is entitled to the following awards and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards:

* Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Meritorious Unit Commendation
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from item 22c of his DD Form 214 the entry "00  00  00" and replacing it with the entry "USARV  01  00  00";

	b.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Meritorious Unit Commendation
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation

	c.  adding to item 30 (Remarks) the entry "SERVICE IN VIETNAM FROM DECEMBER 1969 TO DECEMBER 1970."



      ____________x____________
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010290



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010290



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012201

    Original file (20120012201.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his service in Vietnam and his correct DOB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 18 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011881

    Original file (20110011881.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant's third tour in the Republic of Vietnam is not properly documented on his separation DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 December 1971; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this foreign service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000089

    Original file (20150000089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, he participated in four campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam; therefore, he is authorized four bronze service stars with his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * adding award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016235

    Original file (20100016235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 4 June 1971 to show: * He had 2 years, 6 months, and 6 days of Foreign and/or Sea Service * The Army Commendation Medal * Four bronze service stars affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal * His service in Vietnam from 14 March 1968 through 24 March 1969 2. Item 30 (Remarks) of his last DD Form 214 shows 14 March 1969 through 24 March 1969 and 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011344

    Original file (20130011344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "V – 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022843

    Original file (20120022843.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017381

    Original file (20130017381.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to honorable and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial which sentenced him to a bad conduct discharge. His records show his service in Vietnam met the time requirements for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021325

    Original file (20120021325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record he was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of service from 6 May 1969 through 6 February 1971. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003369

    Original file (20090003369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he served with the 282nd and the 240th Aviation Companies in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 1966 to 1967 as a chief warrant officer and it is not annotated on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 September 1971. The applicant requested that item 22c of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 September 1971 be corrected to show he completed 2 years of foreign service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018200

    Original file (20130018200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. item 31 (Foreign Service), he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 31 May 1970 through 26 April 1971, a period of 10 months and 27 days. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 July 1969 through 28 April 1971 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good...