Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010258
Original file (20110010258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010258 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or discharge) to show his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) as "Cannoneer (105 Howitzer)" (MOS 13A). 

2.  The applicant states he suffers from hearing loss that resulted from his PMOS as a cannoneer.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 October 1963.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 26 days of creditable active service, of which 1 year, 11 months, and 19 days was overseas service in Hawaii.  

4.  His DD Form 214 also shows at the time of his separation, he was assigned to A Battery, 2nd Battalion, 9th Artillery, U.S. Army Hawaii.  He was honorably released from active duty on 3 October 1965 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group to complete his remaining service obligation.

5.  Item 25 (Specialty Number and Title) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "45F2O Artillery Mech[anic]."

6.  There is no indication in his reconstructed records that he was trained in or held MOS 13A.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated, in pertinent part, that item 25a shows the primary MOS code number and title. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his PMOS as 13A.

2.  The applicant's available records do not contain evidence and he did not provide any that shows he completed training for and was awarded MOS 13A.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed the MOS listed on his DD Form 214 at the time of his separation in 1965 is correct and there is no basis to change it. 




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010258





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010258



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023627

    Original file (20100023627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also contains separation orders issued by the United States Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, Washington on 30 June 1971 that lists his MOS as 71F in the standard name line. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he held MOS 71F on the date of separation. Given the applicant was properly awarded and held PMOS 71F on the date of his REFRAD it would not be appropriate to revoke this MOS or delete all references to it from the record and DD Form 214 as requested by the applicant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002729

    Original file (20120002729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 13A (field artillery basic) and the addition of a Purple Heart. The applicant's record does not contain any documentation and he did not provide any evidence to show he was recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart. His record is void of evidence and he has not provided sufficient evidence to show MOS 13A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005482

    Original file (20140005482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he completed advanced individual training at Fort Sill, OK, for an artillery MOS and served in Vietnam as an artilleryman. On 16 April 1970, Headquarters, Americal Division, published SO Number 106 affecting the following changes effective 4 March 1970: appointing him to the grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 in MOS 94B, withdrawing MOS 13A, and awarding him primary MOS (PMOS)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017245

    Original file (20110017245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of his personnel service records failed to show evidence and he did not provide any evidence showing that he was ever awarded or recommended for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. His records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following to his DD Form 214: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002806

    Original file (20080002806.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and to have his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) corrected to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). The applicant’s DD form 214 shows that he was awarded the (MOS) 13A (Cannoneer). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004727

    Original file (20110004727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his pay grade as E-5 and his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) as 44C2O (Welder). His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows his pay grade as E-4 and his PMOS as 13A1O. In the absence of evidence to show he was promoted to pay grade E-5 and that PMOS 44C2O was awarded prior to his REFRAD on 14 February 1972, there appears to be no basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007587C070205

    Original file (20060007587C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 15 February 1968, to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 13A1O and that he served in Vietnam. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968, should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017166

    Original file (20120017166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Having prior active service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 1970 in the rank of PFC and he held MOS's 13A and 13E. There are no orders in his records that show he ever served as a CPL/E-4 or was ever promoted to SGT/E-5. There is no evidence in his record that shows he went before a promotion board and was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001985

    Original file (20120001985.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. Based on his service in Vietnam, he is also entitled to correction of item 30 of his DD Form 214 to show he served in Vietnam from 21 August 1971 - 20 October 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007587C080407

    Original file (20070007587C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the military occupational specialty (MOS) listed in Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of his 16 November 1969 Separation Document (DD Form 214) be corrected by adding the Additional Skill Identifier (ASI) "Q" to the fifth character of the MOS code entered. The applicant states, in effect, the 13B40 (Field Artillery...