Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010079
Original file (20110010079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010079 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that she be designated as the annuitant of the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  She states:

* she married the FSM on 1 January 1974
* he was disabled in 1980
* she was married to him when he died and as a result she believes she is entitled to his retirement pay
* she completed the FSM's application for retirement pay in 1980 or 1982 due to his illness

3.  She provides:

* DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty)
* marriage license
* certificate of death 
* retirement orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant and the FSM were married on 28 December 1973.

3.  The FSM’s military service records show that he initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 July 1973.  

4.  He was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 26 July 1980.

5.  His record contains a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 1 July 1980, which shows the following entries in:

   a.  Part IV - Survivor Benefit Plan Election:

   (1)  Item 13,  Are you married? - Yes

   (2)  Item 14,  Do you have dependent children? - Yes
	
   (3)  Item 15,  Check the following to indicate the type of coverage you desire:

   Block c.  Dependent children only		

   b.  Part IX (SBP Certificates) is blank.	 
		
6.  His record contains a memorandum from Brooke Army Medical Center, dated 1 July 1980, to the applicant which states that retiring service members may voluntarily participate in the SBP program and if a member chooses other than maximum spouse coverage, the law requires that the spouse be notified.  The applicant was informed that the FSM elected on 1 July 1980 to provide an annuity for dependent children only.  She was asked to sign and return the memorandum regarding her understanding of the memorandum.  There is no evidence that she returned the memorandum.

7.  On 28 February 1982, the FSM was removed from the TDRL and was permanently retired.

8.  The FSM died on 4 September 1992.

9.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.   

10.  Public Law 97-35 enacted 13 August 1981, announced a one-year open enrollment period (1 October 1981 - 30 September 1982) for members entitled to retired pay on or before 13 August 1981 giving members the option to enroll or increase previously elected coverage and to add spouse to child only coverage (couldn’t add child to spouse coverage) providing the member lived for two years before beneficiary(ies) became eligible.

11.  Public Law 99-145, the SBP, effective 1 March 1986, established that a spouse's written concurrence was required for retiring member's election that provides less than maximum spouse coverage.   

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the FSM was retired on 26 July 1980.  At that time, he completed a DA Form 4240 that indicated he desired to enroll in SBP for child coverage only.  The applicant was notified of his election.

2.  There is no evidence that shows the FSM later changed his election in the program during a subsequent Open Season.  When the FSM was on the TDRL in 1980 and enrolled in the SBP program there were no laws that required the spouse to concur or non-concur with the SBP election in writing.  Therefore, there is no basis in law or in equity to provide the applicant an SBP annuity.

BOARD VOTE:

_________  _______  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010079



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013510

    Original file (20090013510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In Part V (SBP Election) on this form, the FSM indicated that he was married and did not have dependent children. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Considering there is evidence to show it was the FSM's intent to provide SBP coverage for the applicant, it would be appropriate, as a matter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326

    Original file (20070005326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004639

    Original file (20130004639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's record to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage. He married the applicant on 6 September 1985.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016797

    Original file (20140016797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no documents in the available records and none were provided by the applicant to show the FSM elected full spouse and dependent children coverage. All available information indicates the FSM elected dependent children only coverage and the applicant agreed with his election. Further, as noted on the DA Form 4240, SBP Certificates are only required when married members do not elect full coverage or decline coverage for spouse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021154

    Original file (20120021154.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM and the applicant divorced on 8 May 1991. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant submitted a deemed election request to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068044C070402

    Original file (2002068044C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time they signed the Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel, DA Form 4240, they were not counseled about anything they were signing nor told deductions were to be taken out (if SBP were elected). The FSM retired on 1 September 1982. That the applicant be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s election to participate in the SBP retroactive to 24 September 2001, the date of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077417C070215

    Original file (2002077417C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM's military records show: Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010030

    Original file (20120010030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the record of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within one year of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005772

    Original file (20090005772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he paid into the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) since 1975; therefore, he is no longer required to pay SBP premiums. At that time, he had completed a DA Form 4240 which indicated that he did not desire to enroll in the SBP. When the applicant retired in 1975 and when he enrolled in the SBP program in 1982, there was no law that required the spouse to concur or nonconcur with the SBP election in writing.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000928

    Original file (20110000928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he timely changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The evidence of record shows that the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 19 August 1979, electing "spouse and children" RCSBP coverage under option C, immediate...