Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009807
Original file (20110009807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110009807 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to reflect that she is a legitimate beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits.

2.  The applicant states that she was married to the FSM at the time of his death.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the FSM’s death certificate and a copy of their marriage license.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was born on 13 April 1928.  He was inducted on 8 January 1953 and served until he was retired by reason of length of service on 30 April 1973.  He had served 20 years, 3 months and 17 days of active service.  His records show that he was married with two dependents; however, there is no evidence in his official records to show that he elected to participate in the SBP.  

2.  A review of copies of leave and earnings statements contained in his official records shows no deductions being made for SBP coverage.

3.  The applicant married the FSM on 11 August 1984 in Falls County, Texas.  The FSM passed away on 14 December 1984, only 4 months and 3 days after marrying the applicant.  He was 56 years of age at the time of his death.

4.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  

5.  SBP is a life insurance program which pays an annuity to eligible beneficiaries upon the deaths of covered former service members.  As a Federal Government insurance program, partially subsidized by participant’s premiums, it is strictly governed by Federal statutes that set forth rules for its operation, including eligibility for enrollment, designation of beneficiaries, and authorized changes to beneficiaries.  Retirees do not earn SBP through their service – they earn the right to participate in SBP.  As with any private insurance endeavor, it is encumbent upon individuals to timely apply to participate.

6.  Public Law 94-496, enacted 14 October 1976, but effective 1 October 1976, reduced the waiting period for a new spouse's eligibility from 2 years to 1 year following post-retirement marriage.  In the alternative, a widow may be an SBP beneficiary if she is the mother of issue by that marriage.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.  
 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions that she should be designated as the legitimate beneficiary of the FSM’s SBP benefits has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  The law in effect at the time of the FSM’s death required a 1-year waiting period after marriage to be deemed an eligible beneficiary under the SBP or there must have been a child by that marriage.  Notwithstanding that there is no evidence to show that the FSM was enrolled in and participated in the SBP, the applicant was only married to the FSM for a period of 4 months and 3 days before his death.  There is also no evidence that she is the mother of a child by that marriage. Therefore, she was not an eligible beneficiary under the SBP. 


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009807





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009807



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001369

    Original file (20090001369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her previous request that the records of her husband, the former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "Natural person with insurable interest-mother" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant appealed to the ABCMR in an application dated 1 August 2007 requesting that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he elected to change his SBP coverage from "Natural...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011157

    Original file (20070011157.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her husband's records, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "Natural person with insurable interest-mother" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant provided the following documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 1883, dated 19 July 1994; b. DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060887C070421

    Original file (2001060887C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM's military records from the Army National Guard are not available. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006196C070205

    Original file (20060006196C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, when her husband was notified in 1991 of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, he was single and listed his sister as the person to receive his RCSBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 (Application of Plan), provides, in pertinent part, that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the Plan. However,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010361

    Original file (20120010361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 2656-6, Section III (Conditions that Trigger Eligibility to Change Coverage), Number 8 (I Am Requesting a Change in Coverage Based On:), shows the FSM marked the "Marriage" block which stated, "A member, who does not have a spouse at the time of initial eligibility, may provide SBP for the first spouse acquired after retirement by elective coverage before the first anniversary of that marriage. He and the applicant were married on 7 August 2009. The evidence of record shows her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001957

    Original file (20140001957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her marriage to a deceased former service member (FSM) be recognized as being in excess of the 1 year of marriage required to receive a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. Public Law 94-496, enacted 14 October 1976, reduced this waiting period to 1 year following post-retirement marriage. The evidence shows that on 15 September 1998, the FSM submitted a DD Form 1883 and indicated at that time he was married to a spouse other than the applicant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083250C070215

    Original file (2002083250C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start RCSBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60 th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The evidence of record confirms that the deceased FSM elected RCSBP coverage for his mother as an insurable interest in connection with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015837

    Original file (20090015837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows that the FSM was not married at the time he completed his DD Form 2656. The document indicates that the FSM enrolled in the SBP for a person with an insurable interest (i.e., his brother) and elected an annuity based on the full amount of his retired pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007842

    Original file (20100007842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states the FSM told her he could not elect spouse coverage under the SBP because they were divorced when he retired from the Army. The FSM did not elect to provide SBP spouse coverage within 1 year of their remarriage. The letter from DFAS, dated 29 January 2010, stated that because the courts have conclusively determined that the applicant was the legal spouse of the FSM at the time of his death, the FSM's open enrollment election of SBP coverage for E___ l as his spouse must be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075048C070403

    Original file (2002075048C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60 th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant and the FSM formally married on 10 February 1995 and the FSM died on 17 May 1995. If the applicant can provide evidence to...